I think some of you weren't brought up properly. This doesn't seem gross at all. Have you ever made meatballs at home? Or bread? Or meatloaf? I know it may not be common but try grinding your own beef at home (so you can choose the exact cut and quality) and it will look similar to this video

If you want to be a real man(woman) try raising your own chickens that are both for eggs and for slaughter. Don't assume I am a monster for killing them. I don't like to see animals suffer so I made sure the blade was clean and sharp. I made sure it was quick and painless. After removing the feathers and innards some of the meat went to be fried on the bone while the rest was ground.

I stick by my opinion that those of you who are grossed out by this have been sheltered, too far removed from food to understand where it comes from.

Oh and read this http://articles.cnn.com/2012-04-30/asia/world_asia_philippines-pagpag-slums_1_trash-bags-pagpag-chicken?_s=PM:ASIA and get back to me

>> ^spoco2:

(I was going to link to a video of Meatloaf performing at our 2011 AFL grand final, because that was actually live and HORRIBLE... but it would seem he's done a good job of having all copies taken down)


Here you go. You werent lying, that is HORRIBLE!

http://rutube.ru/tracks/4868949.html

spoco, that Meatloaf performance has to be heard to be believed. I was watching it without sound in a pub, and only heard it later. I was speechless.

Three things:
a) Yeah, a lip synced 'show' is hardly 'livemusic', so I don't think it fits there... and it makes me sad that people are fine with watching someone move around and pretend to sing like that
b) Who the fuck cares that she flipped the bird... man the outcry in America when someone does that is so FUCKING SAD. It's just so baffling to see American shows with someone flipping the bird being blurred out. Grow the fuck up
c) The staging of it was pretty sweet.

(I was going to link to a video of Meatloaf performing at our 2011 AFL grand final, because that was actually live and HORRIBLE... but it would seem he's done a good job of having all copies taken down)

But on that note it reminded me of a damn fine ad that ran during last year's AFL grand final... which hadn't been posted here. For shame! Shameless plug for own sift

I don't like the stuff they do with fast-food. But the "TurbaconEpic Thanksgiving" was well... epic. And not in the new-age internet sense. I mean it truly, truly was skillful, innovative, Greek tragedy-style EPIC.

Also, people who put ketchup or any sort of BBQ sauce on meatloaf should be burned alive and served to me as ketchup-free meatloaf with gravy and mashed potatoes.

>> ^quantumushroom:

Could use less name-calling of the ladies. Otherwise brilliant.
If you could eat that entire loaf in one sitting without dying you'd gain almost 10 pounds.
Epic, indeed.


Thats not name calling, its foreplay.

The hosts mannerisms grow on you.

In reply to this comment by nach0s:
I don't know, I think your initial instincts were spot on.

remember the janet jacskon incident, when a whole generation of americna children were ruined at once? where are they today? probably all in jail or out rapeing.

i remember watching a bizarre show on discovery. it was about motorcycle accidents or something, and this one woman was brought to the emergency room after crashing on her bike.. or "woman". because she was reduced to a pile of meatloaf, guts hanging out, arm torn off etc.. and opsie, there in the pile of human flesh was a little censor blur, because on top of the pile of human flesh was the part that used to be her nipple. can't show that!

>> ^dgandhi:

>> ^shinyblurry:
Did you know that Cyrus freeing of the slaves confirms the bible is true?

[sarcasm]
[PROPHESY] I'm going to eat pickles while writing this post [/PROPHESY]
Clearly, since text can not be edited, all text which precedes a statement must, of necessity, predate it. Therefore if a claim is made in a text, and then said to be fulfilled in the same text, the author must be a true profit.
[/sarcasm]
>> ^shinyblurry:
Titus Flavius Josephus. The same historian who confirms that Jesus was a historical figure and affirms His life death and resurrection.

Josephus's testimony is widely considered forged, and few, excepting christian ideologues, claim that it has not been at least altered. The older Arabic translation does not contain a profession of faith, just an account of the claims of the followers, and saying that christians exist, is not the same as saying that they have their facts straight.
Josephus, of course, is not the only source on Cyrus, he ruled a fucking empire, he was not some two bit sheep herd. Yet you avoid the issue, you made a claim, Cyrus refutes it.
>> ^shinyblurry:
This agrees with modern historians, almost none of which make the ridiculous claim that Jesus never existed.

Some do make this "ridiculous" claim, and those who are left still have not provided the slightest shred of evidence that someone of that name did anything like what is stated in the gospels.
There is no historical reason to believe that such a person did exist, and the gospels are so glaringly contradictory that the authors clearly cared nothing about historical accuracy. Absent any historical authority in the gospels, or the forgeries, there is just as much chance that some guy named meatloaf was tearing around Galilee on his motorcycle at or around 30CE, but I don't believe it.
P.S. I ate pickles

+1 for the pickles...

I had Antelope.

Clearly, since text can not be edited, all text which precedes a statement must, of necessity, predate it. Therefore if a claim is made in a text, and then said to be fulfilled in the same text, the author must be a true profit.

hilarious. So, the bible is only good for the claims you wish to prove. Again, you show your lack of research..the prophecy and the fufillment of the prophecy are in seperate books written 1 or 2 hundred years apart. I'm stating to get the idea that you don't actually know anything and I'm arguing with a search engine.

Josephus's testimony is widely considered forged, and few, excepting christian ideologues, claim that it has not been at least altered. The older Arabic translation does not contain a profession of faith, just an account of the claims of the followers, and saying that christians exist, is not the same as saying that they have their facts straight.

Josephus, of course, is not the only source on Cyrus, he ruled a fucking empire, he was not some two bit sheep herd. Yet you avoid the issue, you made a claim, Cyrus refutes it.

It's not "widely considered forged". Again you don't know what you're talking about.

Educate yourself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6cQgqbXYN0

I'm avoiding nothing; yes, there are other sources for Cyrus, but the only sources concerning freeing the jews are from the bible and Josephus. You can't have it both ways..you can't claim the bible for evidence when the entire evidence you're claiming was about what Cyrus was doing for God, let alone it was the fulfillment of prophecy from the book of Jeremiah. You can't say Josephus is discredited yet claim it for evidence about the jews either. If the bible is evidence, then the credit goes to God for freeing the slaves.

If you say Josephus is accurate, you have to admit Jesus is a historical figure. Either way, your evidence is firmly in my territory. I'll happily admit that you have one example in the whole of human history of slaves being freed if you'll admit that Jesus was a historical figure.

There is no historical reason to believe that such a person did exist,
and the gospels are so glaringly contradictory that the authors
clearly cared nothing about historical accuracy. Absent any historical
authority in the gospels, or the forgeries, there is just as much
chance that some guy named meatloaf was tearing around Galilee on his
motorcycle at or around 30CE, but I don't believe it.

Doesn't seem like many people agree with you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus#Jesus_as_myth

>> ^shinyblurry:
Did you know that Cyrus freeing of the slaves confirms the bible is true?


[sarcasm]
[PROPHESY] I'm going to eat pickles while writing this post [/PROPHESY]

Clearly, since text can not be edited, all text which precedes a statement must, of necessity, predate it. Therefore if a claim is made in a text, and then said to be fulfilled in the same text, the author must be a true profit.
[/sarcasm]

>> ^shinyblurry:
Titus Flavius Josephus. The same historian who confirms that Jesus was a historical figure and affirms His life death and resurrection.


Josephus's testimony is widely considered forged, and few, excepting christian ideologues, claim that it has not been at least altered. The older Arabic translation does not contain a profession of faith, just an account of the claims of the followers, and saying that christians exist, is not the same as saying that they have their facts straight.

Josephus, of course, is not the only source on Cyrus, he ruled a fucking empire, he was not some two bit sheep herd. Yet you avoid the issue, you made a claim, Cyrus refutes it.

>> ^shinyblurry:

This agrees with modern historians, almost none of which make the ridiculous claim that Jesus never existed.


Some do make this "ridiculous" claim, and those who are left still have not provided the slightest shred of evidence that someone of that name did anything like what is stated in the gospels.

There is no historical reason to believe that such a person did exist, and the gospels are so glaringly contradictory that the authors clearly cared nothing about historical accuracy. Absent any historical authority in the gospels, or the forgeries, there is just as much chance that some guy named meatloaf was tearing around Galilee on his motorcycle at or around 30CE, but I don't believe it.

P.S. I ate pickles

Tags for this video have been changed from 'paula deen food network, paula deen recipes, paula deen recipe, paula deen meatloaf' to 'banned' - edited by jonny

Having never visited, I've always wondered if there were American food restaurants in China and Europe. I imagine meatloaf, Thanksgiving turkey, mac and cheese, etc. would be on the menu.

I find Alf highly creepy ever since this video:

http://videosift.com/video/Creepy-ALF-Here-Comes-Mister-Meatloaf

@BoneRemake:

If you like fabulously bad films, especially ones that are purposefully fabulously bad, and you like 50's monster/invader movies (a genre stocked with fabubad films) you'll probably want to watch it, yes. A lot of it's funny. Oh, and they kill Meatloaf,and you can never get too much of that I always say.