Mad Max should have used this maneuver in the second film. Expensive in tires, but good for indiscriminate killing.

>> ^hpqp:

promote for beer, buttocks and bronze!


Cheers for the promote me man ;-)

>> ^MilkmanDan:

>> ^Yogi:
Whomever is the candidate that will destroy the United States...just fucking rip it to shreds. Apparently we're all too fucking comfortable with our TVs and our couches and our fatass burgers. So lets let the monkeys loose, have them destroy this country and then we'll see how fucking fast the American people wake up and start running their own damn country. And if they don't, then we deserve nothing.
Who's with me! VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE WHO'LL DESTROY AMERICA!!!

I find your ideas intriguing, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter. I think you should call it: "Why things have to get worse before they can get better".


A LOT Fucking worse. Like Mad Max worse!

I wanted to be like a cross between Mad Max, Deckard, Kurt Cobain and Thurston Moore. But, now that I'm me and I have drank tons of alcohol and consumed many pounds of drugs I could be wrong about that, I think I might have forgotten.

one kid i beat SO bad and in such a violent rage actually RIPPED his bottom lip off.
they literally had to take skin grafts from his asshole to reconstruct his lips.

Maybe it's the edible THC, but this filled my basement with horrified, joyous laughter.

BTW, Downunder tag...was this Australia? Giving bullies the gift of Mad Max.

Not quite Mad Max, but still a chilling post-apocalyptic dystopia.

>> ^blankfist:

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
I'm sure this chap means well, but this is not a lecture, it's a sermon.
Without regulation, what prevents one person from enslaving another? or robbing another? or killing another? or raping another? or molesting a child? or destroying the environment? or exploiting labor? He makes it clear that he does not like government, but he provides no evidence for his own utopian belief system, and belief without evidence is the definition of faith. I'll say it again....
Belief without evidence = Faith
On the other hand, we all have a good understanding of government; which types of governments work and which kinds of governments don't. We also have a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of these different types of civic structures. It's a known quantity, with thousands of years of evidence to draw from.
Unless this guy's pie in the sky resembles Mad Max Beyond the Thunderdome, he is hopelessly naive.

"It is indeed probable that more harm and misery have been caused by men determined to use coercion to stamp out a moral evil than by men intent on doing evil." -- F.A. Hayek


Yeah, look at religion. Government, however, is a necessary evil, and would be less evil if it were less self-serving (I'm looking at all you stock-holding, lobby-swinging, corporate-pandering politicians) and more about the people's needs.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

I'm sure this chap means well, but this is not a lecture, it's a sermon.
Without regulation, what prevents one person from enslaving another? or robbing another? or killing another? or raping another? or molesting a child? or destroying the environment? or exploiting labor? He makes it clear that he does not like government, but he provides no evidence for his own utopian belief system, and belief without evidence is the definition of faith. I'll say it again....
Belief without evidence = Faith
On the other hand, we all have a good understanding of government; which types of governments work and which kinds of governments don't. We also have a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of these different types of civic structures. It's a known quantity, with thousands of years of evidence to draw from.
Unless this guy's pie in the sky resembles Mad Max Beyond the Thunderdome, he is hopelessly naive.


"It is indeed probable that more harm and misery have been caused by men determined to use coercion to stamp out a moral evil than by men intent on doing evil." -- F.A. Hayek

I'm sure this chap means well, but this is not a lecture, it's a sermon.

Without regulation, what prevents one person from enslaving another? or robbing another? or killing another? or raping another? or molesting a child? or destroying the environment? or exploiting labor? He makes it clear that he does not like government, but he provides no evidence for his own utopian belief system, and belief without evidence is the definition of faith. I'll say it again....

Belief without evidence = Faith

On the other hand, we all have a good understanding of government; which types of governments work and which kinds of governments don't. We also have a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of these different types of civic structures. It's a known quantity, with thousands of years of evidence to draw from.

Unless this guy's pie in the sky resembles Mad Max Beyond the Thunderdome, he is hopelessly naive.

I actually said outloud " russians have carriers ?? "


man I sort of felt stupid there, I wonder why you never hear or see any of the other nations ships besides china, Canada I know only has our National Hms Canoe or whatnot and a couple Gyro-copters like in mad max..

After the Mad Max Apocalypse can we make this the general understanding of how to play golf?

I'm skeptical... In Mad Max, antique French gold rooster coins were the most sought after items.

Also, have you considered the markup is because it's +1 magic gold?

Mad Max = Awesome
Road Warrior = Awesome
Beyond Thunderdome = Jumped the Shark

I hate to break the spell for you but Mel Gibson is not Mad Max.

Unappetizing as it may be, projecting an image as a director/producer is a pretty big deal and he ought to have his shit together because I'm sure it isn't just his money riding on it.

>> ^burdturgler:
After 4 years he should be ready for this question and have an easy response to it. The whole shocked 'dude come on get over it' doesn't cut it. Besides that he looks like he's either half in the bag or coming off a rough night.


Nah, this reply's better. It's the, 'You wouldn't ask this if we where sitting around having polite conversation.. not to mention if you where asking this to my face.'.

The question is an obvious tabloid move. Yeah he could have had some pre-prepared auto-response to the question handy.. but that's not the Mad Max who chains people's feet to a rigged exploding car that I know.

Granted I suspect Mel has something of an attitude / ego, but better that than acting fake.