>> ^Kevlar:
>> ^Sketch:
Who the hell even owns an icepick any more let alone drives around with one!? That's a red flag.

Actually, I think the question is more who the hell needs an icepick in Jamaica?


I'd say the video answers this question perfectly...any guy in Jamaica who fears the prostitute he's hiring tonight might not be a woman.

Happy to oblige.

In reply to this comment by Drax:
In reply to this comment by Kevlar:
>> ^Sketch:
Who the hell even owns an icepick any more let alone drives around with one!? That's a red flag.


Actually, I think the question is more who the hell needs an icepick in Jamaica?

It's rare that I burst out into spontaneous laughter due to a comment...

In reply to this comment by Kevlar:
>> ^Sketch:
Who the hell even owns an icepick any more let alone drives around with one!? That's a red flag.


Actually, I think the question is more who the hell needs an icepick in Jamaica?

It's rare that I burst out into spontaneous laughter due to a comment...

>> ^Sketch:
Who the hell even owns an icepick any more let alone drives around with one!? That's a red flag.


Actually, I think the question is more who the hell needs an icepick in Jamaica?

yah its strange , in Jamaica its illegal to ware camouflage as a civilian. its strange they way that things can lose there functoin or intended meaning when used for fasoin.

Citrohan, it's odd that you would leave out the huge number of democracies in Latin America and Africa that are not perceived as scientifically productive. Many of these democracies have far higher voting participation rates than America, and yet this has not led to any major scientific breakthroughs from these societies. We don't have to constantly judge democracies on a national scale either. We can go city by city, too. How scientifically productive are the democracies of Baltimore or Washington DC, for example?

There are probably more scientific breakthroughs coming from the non-democratic society of China than from all of the democratic societies of Africa and Latin America, too. Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were capable of far surpassing modern day Africa and Latin America's achievements in science as well. Both societies were probably far more oppressive than, say, Jamaica or Costa Rica. Scientifically speaking though, Nazi Germany and Communist Russia were far more impressive.

As for why I brought up free speech vs democracy, you said this: "It makes totally sense; a free society, where ideas and information can be easily exchanged, coupled with a healthy amount of capital from the private sector to fund research is the best environment for scientific advances."

In this one statement, you seemed to combine free speech, capitalism, and democracy into one whole body that cannot exist separately. I think this is very incorrect. Capitalism and democracy are very much at odds at each other. At best, they are checks against each other's excesses. Free speech is not necessary for either of the two, as well. This is why I don't think science and democracy make sense together. Democracy doesn't care about the truth, it cares about what's popular. Many aspects of science are highly unpopular to this day. One could argue that global environmental catastrophe is approaching quickly, and that this is well known amongst the scientific community, and has been for decades, and yet the world's democracies have done nothing and have basically led us to our doom.

And is capitalism compatible with science? I'm not sure, but I think it's more compatible with science than democracy is. At least capitalism has a kind Social Darwinism going for it, where the uneducated and lazy masses can be tossed aside with little guilt, left to die early in poverty. Scientists seem like elitists just by their nature, able to ply their trade to great economic benefit, rising to the top of the income brackets. Capitalism is very much the ideology of the elites it seems..

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by kulpims.

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Best-reason-to-visit-Jamaica-this-guy

dupe of this:
http://www.videosift.com/video/Best-reason-to-visit-Jamaica-this-guy

Now that you're rich, let's forget all these guys and finally run away together to Jamaica, whadaya say?

CONGRATS!!!

Great song. Jamaica rocks!

Catch-22 - Joseph Heller
Childhood's End - Arthur C. Clark
On the Road - Jack Kerouac
Foundation - Isaac Asimov
The Stars my Destination - Alfred Bester
The Martian Chronicles - Ray Bradbury
A High Wind in Jamaica - Richard Hughes
Huckleberry Finn - Mark Twain
Slaughterhouse-Five - Kurt Vonnegut
The Call of the Wild - Jack London

This list is the product of a few moments of reflection. I read many of these books when I was young but their subject matter combined with where I was in my life left me with indelible memories.

Also, the people above me have good taste.

This is a very interesting video and its plain to the truth as Jamaica is one of the countries where there is a booming sex tourist industry. The fact of the matter is that women want to feel love and appreciated, but in the north American culture, beauty is defined by the media so its easy for someone not to feel love and appreciated base on their physical appearance, while in Jamaica there is an appreciation for women on all levels plus there is also an economic benefit to providing these services.

Check out http://www.jafreak.net is an ultra inclusive, adult erotic private network that allows singles and couples to interact with each other on a personal basis through a site that is safe and secure. This site would give you more insight into the whole aspect of sex tourism in Jamaica.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Music, neckview, sexy, rock, classic' to 'Music, neckview, sexy, rock, classic, jamaica' - edited by rasch187

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by maatc.