Actually my only worry with this is that it's directed by the same guy who produced the Iron Man turds.

>> ^honkeytonk73:

Looks far more promising than 'Thor' as inferred by the hammer at the end of Iron Man 2. Meh


The hammer is my penis.

I don't exactly agree with Dag on the "let's stop making super hero movies" thing... but yeah, I also think it looks lame. The CGI looks terrible (particularly his suit and mask), and even the acting isn't good. And Hal Jordan is not a goofy character. And Blake Lively's acting... just seemed terrible.

I want more super hero movies, but I want them to be made properly.

>> ^honkeytonk73:

Looks far more promising than 'Thor' as inferred by the hammer at the end of Iron Man 2. Meh


Honkeytonk73: I think you'll want to watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOQv_H2W_pU&feature=related
and this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77I-SKeBkQE

Looks far more promising than 'Thor' as inferred by the hammer at the end of Iron Man 2. Meh

Tags for this video have been changed from 'stop, motion, iron, man, bruce, lee, patrick, boivin, animation' to 'stop motion, iron man, bruce, lee, patrick boivin, animation, hopeurtagsarebetternow' - edited by BoneRemake

Hello west99, you were banned because we do not allow "self-links" and as your post http://videosift.com/video/Iron-Man-2-Movie-Review is made by yourself, it is a self-link.

I agree wholeheartedly, hence my, I thought, clear and inviting statement to that effect.

The course of events I was seeking was his appeal via honest explanation with a resultant clemency. Sans that....I am disappointed he did not avail himself of same.

That is not to say I will not pay heed to your words and attempt to glean a better insight.

Respective to the rules, there indeed are many, but this is number one in the FAQ.

I considered withholding the ban, is that what you would suggest?
>> ^Sagemind:

West99 obviously didn't understand the rules, which is why he/she came right out and claimed to the the animator. I sometimes find a direct Ban can be a little harsh in a case like this.
Sometimes education is better than expulsion.
It wasn't like he /she was spamming, just missed the rule - and there are a lot of them.
Yes, Ban is the correct course, but maybe ad a little finesse.

I aims to pleeze....

Thank you. Nice to hear from you.

In reply to this comment by residue:
nice detective work. For some reason the setup and the "catch" cracked me up this morning. He walked right into it

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
What is your relationship to this video?

nice detective work. For some reason the setup and the "catch" cracked me up this morning. He walked right into it

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
What is your relationship to this video?

*ban

Self-Link.

Please, read the FAQ regarding Self-Linking. It is a bannable offense on the VideoSift.

If it was a unintentional, which is what I perceive it to be, it could be mitigated via a statement to that effect to appeal or contest the banning. There is precedent for such.
>> ^west99:

Hi Chicchorea!
My relationship with this video? I'm the animator/comic. Just having some fun with Iron Man and the whole idea of "movie reviews".
West

Hi Chicchorea!

My relationship with this video? I'm the animator/comic. Just having some fun with Iron Man and the whole idea of "movie reviews".

West

Tags for this video have been changed from 'iron man' to 'iron man, crocodile' - edited by Fusionaut

>> ^Ryjkyj:

Damn, when you said "With Helmet", I thought you meant the band.


Iron Head > Iron Man

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJBm1IyJ624 from http://nerdapproved.com/movies/iron-man-2-the-alternate-opening/ from http://www.neatorama.com/2010/09/26/the-airplane-helmet-kissing-scene-in-iron-man-2-explained/

7 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.