Wow, this is such fine bullshit.

Yep, there are a bunch of uneducated idiots around.

There are a bunch of horrible racists around.

There are hate mungers who hate Jews and refuse to accept the Holocaust .

Then he takes these hypothetical questions about one of the most hated people of all time, and tries to make it seem shocking that people would suggest that it would be ok to kill him or those that created him.


AND THEN HE TRIES TO BLAME IT ALL ON HIM NOT BEING CHRISTIAN.

Bloody hell this guy is twisted.

I didn't get all the way through it, I don't need to have this guy use the same tactics that Hitler used to push his agenda. I just jumped through a bit, started seeing that he pushed these questions on people and then started saying that they should 'trust alone in Jesus Christ'.

Argh, he's disgusting.

I'm going to *promote this, as I want people on the sift with more patience, and more time than I to pick apart all the logical fallacies, all the straw man arguments, all the horrendous emotive bullshit in play here.

This man obviously does not see the stunning hypocritical nature of using fear and propaganda to push his agenda in just the way Hitler did. Mr Comfort, go off to a cabin with Mr Cameron and ogle your bananas and crocoduck, leave the rest of the world alone.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'potholer54, atheists, creationists, golden croaduck, science, evolution' to 'potholer54, atheists, creationists, golden crocoduck, science, evolution' - edited by Boise_Lib

Someone tell Potholer54 about this guy! I think we have a new Crocoduck Award contender! What a rambling bunch of nonsense - the US Americans need Bibles to help the hungry children and education such as Turkey and the France, everywhere like such as.

Lol, IDiot-girl doesn't like being called out on her BS.

fixed it with a mirror!

>> ^BoneRemake:

dead -copyright claim.

>> ^shinyblurry:

this is the damned speaking to the damned..find hope in no hope! when his spirit leaves his body he is going to be utterly fucking terrified


Don't feed the troll crocoduck.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Matt Dillahunty, Russell Glasser, Ray Comfort, Bananaman, nightmare, Crockoduck' to 'Matt Dillahunty, Russell Glasser, Ray Comfort, Bananaman, nightmare, Crocoduck' - edited by xxovercastxx

Aw shit, we totally missed an opportunity to make a crocoduck! Dammit!
>> ^xxovercastxx:

This reminds me of when Kirk Cameron talks about evolution.

Ok, as you cited wikipedia, I will as well. "Guilt by association can sometimes also be a type of ad hominem fallacy, if the argument attacks a source because of the similarity between the views of someone making an argument and other proponents of the argument." It's ad hominem. Further, as you stated, pseudoscientific is a pejorative. It's an attack on his credibility as a scientist by associating him with people like what's his name from Growing Pains.

I never criticized his discussion of the beetle. I am not an entomologist, I'm a vision scientist. I criticized the implication that people who believe like Behe also believe that the eye was too complicated to have evolved. On the contrary, Behe openly admits the likelihood of the evolution of the eye once started from an eyespot, or simple photoreceptor of any sort. Where he noted the possibility of irreducible complexity was in the biochemical transduction of light into electrochemical gradients. That argument was never addressed in the video.

Further, when talking about his views as pseudoscientific, I presume you are referring the common complaint that ID is unfalsifiable. Well, then, I would challenge you to express how the theory of evolution itself could be falsified? Here's Darwin's take from the Origin of Species: "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." If you take the position that all claims of irreducible complexity are simply matters of the poverty of imagination, and as such it is not demonstrable, you open evolution up to the same criticism.

While I agree, a hole in our understanding of the universe should not invite the cure-all "God did it," the problem of the falsifiability of evolution remains. That is, those that wish to put evolution into the purview of science, should precisely define what they would accept as evidence it is wrong. While Dawkins often claims scientists do this, I've rarely seen him publicly explain what such evidence would be. When he does, it is usually something snide, such as "finding precambrian fossils of hippos." I find that argument about as appealing as the crocoduck.

i kinda want to see a crocoduck

Tags for this video have been changed from 'crockoduck, awards, evolution, fail' to 'golden crocoduck, awards, evolution, fail, creationism' - edited by xxovercastxx

http://videosift.com/video/Golden-Crocoduck-awards-2010

agreed
bill has been off his game lately
he's too angry and forceful to check himself
he's still on point most of the time, but i would tap him on the shoulder and suggest rewatching a show of his every once in a while

love dawkins' crocoduck tie

I remember when the way of the master debated against the rational response squad. Personally, I think they both are terrible at representing their sides.

The rational response squad isn't even in the same ball park as Richard Dawkins, PZ Meyers, or Christopher Hitchens. It's kind of painful to watch them make arguments sometimes.

Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort are just total retards. They just keep repeating shit like "This camera is complicated, and it was created. We're complicated, therefore we're created!" And then they bust out the picture of the crocoduck!

A giant crocoduck.

What about the Crocoduck? I was promised a Crocoduck!