I can't believe people want to charge Saint Cheney with having committed a crime.

For god's sake, he's Obama's Islamic, Lying Cousin. I know that the media is shameless about digging into the President-Elect's family, but if the last 8 years have taught me anything, it's that the media shouldn't question anything the President does for the first 5-6 years of his administration.

Anything else would be treasonous.

Not to mention, they're charging Bush's mentally handicapped friend from Texas, Alberto Gonzales. That's just not fair! Fortunately, the man's probably already forgotten all about it, and will forget to show up at his trial, and forget to heed the subpoenas when they arrive.

It's not his fault, he was born without the ability to recall his own criminal wrongdoings!

Personally, I'm tired of all these liberal activist judges from the blue state of Texas picking on their native son President, George W. Bush.

Don't they know that when God wrote the Consitution, Article III says "Thou shalt not question Republican President's absolute authority, but thou shalt not respect Democratic President's authority at all?" I mean seriously, guys, didn't they teach you that when you were getting your law degree from Pat Robertson's Liberty University, or at your neighborhood GOPAC cell?

Seriously, it's like you all have forgotten the Golden Rule of Conservatism: take whatever you want, however you can!

This goes to PJPhoto, your youtube account shows that you have the same name as your video sift name.

And the video is posted to that account, that alone is evidence enough that you have Violated the Self Link rule.

http://www.videosift.com/faq-en.php#posting_guidelines

Please do not self link.

While you may see this site as a great way to promote a project you are working on or promoting, it would be bad for our content if everyone just put up videos of them and their friends doing random things. If you are associated with a project you think is truly amazing and must be shared, please contact us. We'll take a look at it and if we also think it's great too, we'll post it for you. If you attempt to post it yourself, your video and account will be deleted. Hey, it's harsh, but it's harsh love.

What exactly consitutes a self link?

If any of the following is true about a particular video you are considering submitting, it is a self link, with NO exceptions for any member:

* The video is associated with your account on the video host (i.e., you uploaded it to YouTube, Google Video, etc.).
* You played any role, no matter how large or small, in any aspect of the production of the video.
* You are in any way responsible for or involved in marketing, promoting, or any other manner of proliferating the video.
* You could receive any form of compensation (monetary or otherwise) as a result of the submission or subsequent views.
* You are somehow represented in the content of the video whether photographically, artistically, audibly, or metaphorically.

If you self link, regardless of your logic or explanation, you are violating the posting guidelines. There are no exceptions for any reason, whatsoever.

Finally, submitting a video that is considered spam falls within our definition of a self-link. If you create an account solely to post a video for whatever reason, but do not actually participate in VideoSift in any other way before or after, you may be considered a spammer/self-promoter and your account is subject to banning.

At what point is this going to stop being an issue of free speech and "journalism" and start being called for what it really is? Fox "news" represents a clear and present domestic threat to the American people and consitution and they should be treated no differently than the Timothy McVeighs and Terry Nicholes of this country.
Those at fox hind behind a veil of patriotism yet fight for a state that would operate in direct contradiction to its original founding and purpose.
This is not a matter of just turning off something you don't like or don't agree with or chocking it up to them being up to their ol tricks as usual, this is a matter of a state sponsored propaganda/terrorist machine working to silence those who disagree with it.

From the Posting guidelines

http://www.videosift.com/faq-en.php#posting_guidelines
_________________________________________________________

Please do not self link.

While you may see this site as a great way to promote a project you are working on or promoting, it would be bad for our content if everyone just put up videos of them and their friends doing random things. If you are associated with a project you think is truly amazing and must be shared, please contact us. We'll take a look at it and if we also think it's great too, we'll post it for you. If you attempt to post it yourself, your video and account will be deleted. Hey, it's harsh, but it's harsh love.

What exactly consitutes a self link?

If any of the following is true about a particular video you are considering submitting, it is a self link, with NO exceptions for any member:

* The video is associated with your account on the video host (i.e., you uploaded it to YouTube, Google Video, etc.).
* You played any role, no matter how large or small, in any aspect of the production of the video.
* You are in any way responsible for or involved in marketing, promoting, or any other manner of proliferating the video.
* You could receive any form of compensation (monetary or otherwise) as a result of the submission or subsequent views.
* You are somehow represented in the content of the video whether photographically, artistically, audibly, or metaphorically.

If you self link, regardless of your logic or explanation, you are violating the posting guidelines. There are no exceptions for any reason, whatsoever.

Finally, submitting a video that is considered spam falls within our definition of a self-link. If you create an account solely to post a video for whatever reason, but do not actually participate in VideoSift in any other way before or after, you may be considered a spammer/self-promoter and your account is subject to banning.

*ban *ban *ban *ban *ban *ban
(I wish I could ban)

http://www.videosift.com/faq-en.php#posting_guidelines
Please do not self link.

While you may see this site as a great way to promote a project you are working on or promoting, it would be bad for our content if everyone just put up videos of them and their friends doing random things. If you are associated with a project you think is truly amazing and must be shared, please contact us. We'll take a look at it and if we also think it's great too, we'll post it for you. If you attempt to post it yourself, your video and account will be deleted. Hey, it's harsh, but it's harsh love.

What exactly consitutes a self link?

If any of the following is true about a particular video you are considering submitting, it is a self link, with NO exceptions for any member:

* The video is associated with your account on the video host (i.e., you uploaded it to YouTube, Google Video, etc.).
* You played any role, no matter how large or small, in any aspect of the production of the video.
* You are in any way responsible for or involved in marketing, promoting, or any other manner of proliferating the video.
* You could receive any form of compensation (monetary or otherwise) as a result of the submission or subsequent views.
* You are somehow represented in the content of the video whether photographically, artistically, audibly, or metaphorically.

If you self link, regardless of your logic or explanation, you are violating the posting guidelines. There are no exceptions for any reason, whatsoever.

Finally, submitting a video that is considered spam falls within our definition of a self-link. If you create an account solely to post a video for whatever reason, but do not actually participate in VideoSift in any other way before or after, you may be considered a spammer/self-promoter and your account is subject to banning.

Bad apples conspire to put cherry bombs in a school toilet; those who conspire to engage in this Consitution-rending semantic game need a new definition to cover the scope of their misdeeds. And I hold our media just as accountable; while they deign to call torture Enhanced Interrogation, the investigative team that reports on waterboarding and re-enacts it can't even show it without a goddamn vaseline filter over the lens.

Goofball, take a look at these videos:

Recent:
Amerimexicanada

20+ Years ago:
The Secret Government - The Consitution in Crisis

40+ Years ago:
CFR - The Capitalist Conspiracy

This is nothing new.. it's just that the media has been trained not to cover anything about the operations of the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Annual convention and several other secretive organizations that have major influences on US Government policies and activities. These are the kind of activities that our founders specifically warned us about. During the Carter administration alone every single member of his administration was comprised of CFR and/or Trilateral members. I'm not sure of the figures of this on other administrations yet it warrants an independent investigation. *note: these organizations were founded by the elite rich banker Mr. Rockefeller - whom also initiated the NAFTA agreement.

LOL.. hilarious and accurate in the way of perspective... I love to play sports but I rarely watch because it usually bores the hell out of me and I believe that if people put as much energy into focusing on the serious issues in this country and the violations of our Consitution instead of sports stats and "who is going to win", then we wouldn't be in such a pickle.

Forget "rise to the level of".... Bush is a war criminal by all definitions. Bush had his staff send false intelligence to Secretary of State to try to get the UN to pass a war resolution. Bush's signing statements are unConstitutional. Bush's domestic spying program and non-compliance with FISA is both directly explicitly illegal and un-Constitutional.

Bush's directions to the Justice Dept to allow torture is a crime. That's how Geneva works, if you (as head of state or military or both) set policies or orders which result in violations of Geneva, you get a war tribunal. Period.

How about straight up money crimes? Bush's brother is getting how much from DHS and Dept Education? Jeb's in-law is co-owner of Blackwater. Enron, oil companies, energy policy, losts $billions of $$ on palettes in Iraq.

Imagine you were a mayor or a CEO of a company, WHAT THE FUCK WOULD YOU HAVE TO DO TO GET IMPEACHED? Has Bush so overshot that mark that people just can't comprehend his criminality? I mean this country was willing to Impeach over lying under oath about sex. What about lying about violating the Consitution, or lying to bankrupt your country, or lying that resulted in hundreds of thousands of corpses and enough wounded soldiers to fill up half of the state of Vermont?!

OH! Here's another little nugget!

Section 22!

What exactly consitutes a self link?

If any of the following is true about a particular video you are considering submitting, it is a self link, with NO exceptions for any member:

* The video is associated with your account on the video host (i.e., you uploaded it to YouTube, Google Video, etc.).

So far, those approaching milestones are:
winkler1: 247 (almost a diamond)
farcrafter: 97 (approaching 100)
Consitutional Patriot and aidos are approaching gold at 44
(koshmar was gold, but due to inactivity/deaded posts is down to 49)
and there are lots of sifters on the edge of bronze-dom: chorlton, qruel, cryptographix,tracon,kingbob337,enfranc65, to name a few...
so keep an eye out!

(my apologies if I missed anyone...)

So, would you kill to maintain your birthright of human rights, Bicyclerepairman? You know, cos that's the only solution that Britain and the U.S, have come up with, even in the last 5 years and they're not even defending human rights, just oil rights. The story continues to repeat itself.

Its seems that whenever I write something in CAPITAL LETTERS, its prone to be ignored by my opponents, I said human rights should (this time not capitalized, so you may see it) be a birthright. Would I kill for it? ultimately? Yes. As the first of many possible solutions? No. When someone, or some group has a radically different opinion than me on what consitutes a human right, then my first instinct would be to find out more about why, and debate the issue. We have pretty much agreed on this where I come from, and if someone comes here to enjoy the benefits or take part in the society we have built on those rights, its none of their goddamn business to try to change the rules.

I dont believe in moral relativism, some opinions are just better. Treating women as fellow human beings and not property of their legal husband is one of them. I dont think its a good idea to burn witches or heretics either. We should know better in 2007. We do know better. And the reason we know better is because we understand the world better, and we understand it better because we have been seeking knowledge through science and exploration. religion has never, and will never, help us understand or discover a single new thing. Its whole purpose and definition is the opposite: Dogma.

Hey BlueBalls, you really really do GW a disservice by using his name. You are one ignorant 'Merikan. You are so astonishingly stupid when it comes to immigration, I can't make heads or tails of it.

First of all, most illegal are not even from Mexico (in states not bordering Mexico). You look at northern states that have huge illegal populations (all working in food and retail ships), and they look "Mexican" to an ignorant fuck like you, but in fact are not. Then you have huge populations of "approved" legal residents that the INS has designated by city. Most INS branches has two countries and those branches get all people from, say Somalia, or Bosnia, etc. Those schools, often in smaller towns, have the same problem you cite about second languages. And these are "approved" legal resident aliens. So what's your issue there? "Learn English you "others"!"

Some day you have to realize this cousin-fucker concept of "others" is just racism and xenophobia. You know this country was founded by many "illegals" who were yearning to be free.

I fight for the rights that are described in the Bill of Rights. Basic human rights, not basic American rights. No where does the Constitution (especially the Bill of Rights) claim that the Government can treat non-citizens differently from those who were born on US soil. It is an ideal of how a fair, good, and noble gov't can act in exchange for us allowing it to exist (an necessary evil).

Who do you think was in the park in L.A.? It's not about checking to see if there are illegals, but rather how many people lost their right under the First Amendment to assemble? You;re arguement is that most people there that day were illegals so the cops can beat and kill them, since they are sub-human... But my issue is how many citizens had their CONSITUTION RIGHTS stolen by riot gear thugs shooting "less-lethal" weapons as innocent, peaceful citizens. And you approve of this because some of those people are from Mexico. I hope and pray that you choke on your Taco Bell and die with pico de gallo foaming from your nose.

how dose seting up a cam in sumones bathroom consitute child molistasoin ? lol i love how the news hyps this becuse it fits there technoligy is dangerouse theem. hochi ku ku is most probably a misulim terrorist from iran with his own bomb factory.

+ what a noob if he was a true geek he would have set up a realy small wireless cam some place where the girl wouldnot find it and then just record everything from his laptop. thus leaving no evidence other than the cam whitch u could disguise so u cudent tell it was a cam

I don't think any military engagement should be santizied from the media these and other events must be known of, you want to go to war you have to accept everything that comes with it and not lie to the public by embedding the reporters with the aggressors.

The Saddam video, Hiroshima video, Pearl harbor video, the countless records of World War 2, the 9/11 video, the Daniel Pearl video, Beslan video, the countless PMC videos out there (am looking at you Blackwater) are all important. I don't understand why 9/11 has to consitute history and this doesn't. If Osama Bin Laden was caught tomorrow are you really telling me they would give him a fair trail and let him live eternally in a federally funded prison? Hell no.

The public must know of them all and make their own call, just like they were allowed in Vietnam. Political thinking is flawed, the only time one can sell a military engagement to a populace is when it is of utmost importance to national securtiy, the lack of unbiased analysis by the media concentrated in New York contributed to the beating of the drums of war.

I don't see how pulling a 1984 cleansing event is of benefit. I agree that the actual execution video should not be shown. But coverage should be. These events have incrediable impact on geopolitics. Already there are questions as to the legality of the verdicted reached, which could pan out to make Saddam seem like a Sunni matyr and further inflame secterian violence.