@ gwiz665
Philosophical certainty is the only kind I really care about. And I still don't suppose that God "isn't in certain places" is a true statement if you can't be certain about your certainty, then you aren't certain...thats for certain...wait what? I am not a theist mind you, but I am not certain that God doesn't or can't exist.

I mean, what is the say that the reason that gravity is the way it is and particles move in waves instead of lines aren't just the rules in God's head; that this is just a reality matrix of rules that exist in a beings mind...same thing he supposes in the video. Such would also be unverifiable, but true. That is my main problem with empirical inquiring as a method for truth, it has a limited number of predicates to deal with, and some subjects it can't address.

I admit, my mindset is a minority. I care about truth with a capital T. Most are just focused on limited understandings that make medicines and build spaceships, cool stuff mind you! For me, I much rather focus on what can be called certain, and certainly not. And for the most part, I have to rule that certainty in either case is lacking. As such, I am compelled to believe neither.

We don't see exactly eye to eye on this, but I will still let you touch my man cleavage.

In a complete aside, I had a dream where all the matter, energy, and "stuff" in this universe was actually just an abstraction of some other universe...like we were just a shadow of a reality that existed elsewhere. And there were special beings that could infiltrate this universe and hide. A war broke out between those taking refuge in the "dream world", and they would dodge back and for to reality to affect the dream world in ways that were desirable. Kind of maxrixy, fun stuff!

The reason I bring it up is much like Newton and Einstein point out, we seem to be trapped in perspective. The objectivity of science is really just group subjectiveness. Our individual experience of A is similarly described. So let us all call our experience of A, A prime and just refer to it as an objective event. It works when you want to build a building, but is isn't certainly true. And that defines one of my main problems with most empirical discovery. If you don't see a problem with it, well, then I just care about a different set of truths

wtf? have you all lost your minds?

1. you can't compare a womans vagina to a wad full of cash. but presuming that you could... just because i flashed my wad full of cash does not make it less wrong or even permissible for someone to steal it. your rights end where mine begin.

2. women don't get raped because they're scantily clad. rape is less about sexual gratification and more about power and control. i was a wild ass teenager and i put myself in a lot of unwholesome situations, i experienced my fair share of unwanted, boundary violating sexual advances. i was also a raging tomboy/baby crusty... my clothing didn't have anything to do with the creeps who wanted/tried/did take advantage, it was ALWAYS about power and superiority and control. ALWAYS about some mental defect that made dudes get off on the ability to overpower.

3. you can't blame anyone for mistaking your flirtation with interest. anyone who does is probably being a bitch. but flirting and be provocative is not "stepping into the lion's den and asking to get bit" and you're not contractually obligated to put out... anyone who thinks that it is does is a defective asshole and possibly predatory and almost certainly has issues with women and their ability to own their sexual power, again.. its about power and dominance and control.

4. i sort of agree with the notion that you attract what you put out there. like i chat it up with a lot of mentally ill/homeless men... so a lot of these guys tend to want to marry me.... when i go dancing at the hip hop club, i dont get offended when i get balls rubbed on my leg or some horny drunk guy wants to take me home.... i just go find a girl to dance with after that.... when i go dancing at the gay bar looking like a big dyke, i dont get pissed off when a lesbian flirts with me... i go bowling a lot, i dont get mad when bowling alley people hit on me.... if you dress and behave in a certain way in a certain place, you're bound to attract someone.. you have no right to be surprised or offended when that happens... it may even be what you're looking for.. ... but it does not negate someone else's responsibility to control themselves and respect your words more than your tits. and anyone who doesn't see that, has issues with women and their sexual power. and rape is, once again, about power and control. it is not about cleavage or temptation.

edit: there is also offensive language... i dont get mad if you thought i was flirting with you and expressed an interest, i do get mad if you don't speak to me with respect. again, its about power and control ooorrr maybe you're a social piarha with no idea how interact with people, either way, you're getting turned down and that doesnt make me a tease. it's your problem.

:: Looks down ::

really o_O? all I see is hair.
In reply to this comment by Gallowflak:
You've got something in your cleavage.

You've got something in your cleavage.

Outstanding.

Is that cleavage???

>> ^ctrlaltbleach:

Another Texas sifter! Im actually less than an hour from the festival myself and I hardly ever go but always plan a trip in my head. You think there would be a lot of dirt about the eccentric owner on the web who fancies himself king of the area and supposedly he lives in a castle. I don't know how much of that is hearsay but eh whatev.


You should make it out there this year. It is a must see/do experience. Over 50 acres of things to do and see. Live jousting, music, magic, animal shows (the falcon show is awesome), things for kids, lots of beer and cleavage, great fair food (smoked turkey legs are a must), even live blacksmithing and glassblowing. There are a lot of people dressed up in period garb and everyone is generally pleasant. It can get crowded and if there is any rain there is mud galore, but it really is a trip back in time.

You may even catch a medieval wedding in the old chapel or the royal procession making its way through the streets, fake king and queen with a full court in tow.

My wife got "abducted" by barbarians one year. They just grabbed her and threw her over their shoulder. I had to "fight" a big, shirtless barbarian with two-handed swords to get her back. Random, but very fun.

The dialog was hysterical, and the animation matched it perfectly. One of the funniest and cleverest videos I've seen in at least a week. Good stuff.

The Amazon princess had to whip a valkyrie's ass in my latest one. She doesn't care; she'll take on any mythology.
In reply to this comment by AdrianBlack:
Thank you for the dp! I love this animation, it is absolutely rocking the Heavy Metal style cleavage.
Good eye, Kronos!

I'm also digging on your Roman Woman.
=vv=

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
*doublepromote

Thank you for the dp! I love this animation, it is absolutely rocking the Heavy Metal style cleavage.
Good eye, Kronos!

I'm also digging on your Roman Woman.
=vv=

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
*doublepromote

>> ^dannym3141:

>> ^davidraine:
>> ^dannym3141:
The japanese bullshit (MASSIVE pet peeve)

I don't think "that Japanese bullshit" is a valid complaint.

I know all of that, my friend told me when he linked the video, and i'm honestly very sorry that my response is - i don't care, i hate it and i hate her.


Fair enough. *smile*

>> ^davidraine:

>> ^dannym3141:
I was introduced to this vacuous tart a week or so ago, and she embodies the majority of what i dislike about weeaboos. The japanese bullshit (MASSIVE pet peeve)

While I understand disliking Minxy for ahem playing to her strengths, I don't think "that Japanese bullshit" is a valid complaint. It's not like she's just throwing some anime BS in there for the hell of it - she's actually a student of Japanese and knows what she's talking about when it comes to the language (even if her JWOW videos are at a very low level). She started the blog during a study abroad program in Japan, after all.


I know all of that, my friend told me when he linked the video, and i'm honestly very sorry that my response is - i don't care, i hate it and i hate her.

>> ^dannym3141:

I was introduced to this vacuous tart a week or so ago, and she embodies the majority of what i dislike about weeaboos. The japanese bullshit (MASSIVE pet peeve)


While I understand disliking Minxy for *ahem* playing to her strengths, I don't think "that Japanese bullshit" is a valid complaint. It's not like she's just throwing some anime BS in there for the hell of it - she's actually a student of Japanese and knows what she's talking about when it comes to the language (even if her JWOW videos are at a very low level). She started the blog during a study abroad program in Japan, after all.

>> ^dannym3141:

how can anyone like this!?


Is that a serious question?

>> ^spawnflagger:

>> ^Seric:
Man I hate her, Such an annoying personality, The Content is shit, And you can't get round that she Gets click counts from tit touts And Japan-o-rama dudes Who always watch that new anime All the better if it's lewd Who shun quality of content In favour of these shits Just a girl and her camera Selling wears with her tits
....so shameless

She's selling something? If so, what product is she endorsing?
It might be shameless if she was actually getting money from Elvira (or the owners of Elvira's likeness) but somehow I doubt this is the case.
And, what about her JWOW's? Those are useful.
I'm almost certain Hannah Minx's IQ is higher than Sarah Palin's...


Without taking it too literally spawnflagger - her videos.

If a youtube uploader gets high view ratings for their videos - youtube offers them a slice of the advertising revenue from that video's page.

It's a regular case of tits for cash.

Those JWOW's are less useful than a japanese phrase book and/or one of the many 'teach yourself japanese' type videos available on youtube.

She may well be a very intelligent girl - but that doesn't seem to stop her from appearing completely vacuous on camera.

>> ^Seric:

Man I hate her,
Such an annoying personality,
The Content is shit,
And you can't get round that she
Gets click counts from tit touts
And Japan-o-rama dudes
Who always watch that new anime
All the better if it's lewd
Who shun quality of content
In favour of these shits
Just a girl and her camera
Selling wears with her tits
....so shameless


I upvoted it for the articles...

>> ^Seric:

Man I hate her, Such an annoying personality, The Content is shit, And you can't get round that she Gets click counts from tit touts And Japan-o-rama dudes Who always watch that new anime All the better if it's lewd Who shun quality of content In favour of these shits Just a girl and her camera Selling wears with her tits
....so shameless


She's selling something? If so, what product is she endorsing?

It might be shameless if she was actually getting money from Elvira (or the owners of Elvira's likeness) but somehow I doubt this is the case.

And, what about her JWOW's? Those are useful.

I'm almost certain Hannah Minx's IQ is higher than Sarah Palin's...