/------
BEGIN Sub STROKE:

n = 0
pressure = constHornLevX

If Step = 5 and Cleavage = cHellYeah and n < 20 n=n+1
funcMouseCLick Step 4
End If


While Step = 12 and Nipples = TRUE and Pressure > cRELEASE
Pressure = Pressure - 1
funcMouseCLick Step 12 Repeat
Loop

Call CleanUp

END STROKE
//--------------

BEGIN sub CleanUp...

Thanks! Hopefully it will bring joy to all who look upon it.

..also.. Hooray for girls who enjoy other girls cleavage!! = D


In reply to this comment by Lann:
Your new avatar is very...distracting

I think the really sad fucked up part in all this.

You would rather role models forgo showing kids what appropriate dress & behavior for their level of life experience is like..

then to "oppress all woman-kind" and ask a popular artist to cover the tops of her tits for two 2 mins.

If that amount of cleavage on sesame street is inconsequential..

then how is it all of sudden some outrageous, puritanical, Islamic fundamentalist idea for parents to request 8 more square inches of fabric?

Why is modesty a pejorative term for you?



>> ^handmethekeysyou:

I'm sorry, exactly what is wrong with that when you're dressing yourself?
Do you think there's something wrong with raising our children to accept the human body and human sexuality?
Fuck, The Scarlet Letter was written 160 years ago & was set 100 years prior. We haven't moved past Puritanical ideals yet? Really, really sad.

I'm sorry, exactly what is wrong with that when you're dressing yourself?

Do you think there's something wrong with raising our children to accept the human body and human sexuality?

Fuck, The Scarlet Letter was written 160 years ago & was set 100 years prior. We haven't moved past Puritanical ideals yet? Really, really sad.>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

It's a good decision.
Kids don't notice that stuff consciously but if you saw women with half their cleavage exposed since as early as you can remember..
you're likely to think there's nothing wrong with that when you start dressing yourself. i.e. jessie slaughter
It's called Behavior modeling.
Not to mention I abhor popstars.

as a raging feminist and a mother,.... i gotta disagree.

my kids grew out of the sesame street days years ago, and now are mortified of viewing or duplicating anything remotely attached to sesame street.

are little girls over sexualized in/by pop culture? yes
is it because they saw a pop stars cleavage on sesame street one time when they were 2? probably not.

do i think the same sample of parents will let their little girls idolize vapid, packaged, subtly sexualized and marketed teenage pop stars later in their lives? yes.
and let their little boys form a skewed idea of women and sexuality built around pop culture iconography and too much internet porn? yes.


>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/Stu" title="member since June 23rd, 2010" class="profilelink">Stu
Your point is my point exactly! Our culture is constantly filled with scantily clad females.
As soon as you change the channel you'll find a girl in a bikini is selling you some crap.
So in our hypersexualized marketing culture it's not a cop out to suggest that we promote modest behavior and select role models for young kids who practice modesty.
By obstinately defending Perry's right to show the top of her tits..
You're all missing the point completely.
And essentially condoning someone like Kesha teaching 3 to 7 yr olds their numbers and alphabet by rewording her song about binge drinking and causal drunk sex.
Some of these kids are going to become attached to these shitty artists.
Worship their albums and outfits and success and likely associate being half naked with success and popularity.
They don't even have to be told that. They just see the behavior and emulate it.
My point is. If you show kids racy glamorous popstars they'll aspire to that.
Maybe if you showed a female scientist or olympic athlete or district court judge more female youth would aspire to those things.
...Am i seriously the only windbag on videosift that hold this point of view?

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
No one has a problem that women have cleavage.>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
talentless half naked tarts

@joedirt
No one has a problem that women have cleavage.

We have a problem with the venue and audience the cleavage is on display for.

@pho3n1x
Riiight, cause if your 6 to 15 year old daughter came home begging to dress up like this for Halloween..

"OH sure honey, it's your body. Just don't be a slut, sweetie."
~~~

Humans are visual creatures and we learn the majority of our behavior from watching and imitating others.

Even if the majority of the 3 to 7 demographic doesn't take note of her huge knockers some portion will be influenced by and attempt to emulate her.

So yes, behavior modeling. As in every person needs a good "role model."

Why exactly are you guys okay with training other people's kids to admire crappy pop tunes and the talentless half naked tarts who peddle them anyway?

I love the jerk misogynists users who approve of removing some crappy song because someone has cleavage. Who cares if a pop singer has cleavage? Go cut off your penis because you obviously have issues.

http://imgur.com/KZEOh.jpg

I agree with westy, women should cover up or be stoned by you jerks.

It's a good decision.

Kids don't notice that stuff consciously but if you saw women with half their cleavage exposed since as early as you can remember..

you're likely to think there's nothing wrong with that when you start dressing yourself. i.e. jessie slaughter

It's called Behavior modeling.


Not to mention I abhor popstars.

Ebert's current assertion is that games cannot be considered an artform in the foreseeable future due to their interactive nature. This is good, because he used to say up until a couple of months ago that "games could never be considered art". Supposedly he's since tried his hand at Metroid Prime, and some other classics, but IIRC he even wrote himself that he felt his newbness limited his potential enjoyment of said games considerably. Regarding this though, I'm not sure if he would appreciate this game or the trailer as an exhibit for the "games as art" debate more than, say, the noire of Max Payne (first part - the second sucked much balls).

Having said that, this does look really good to me apart from character detail (obnoxious cleavage and anime-eyes on Elizabeth, anyone?), lack of much-needed tesselation and vertex shading and lack of RPG elements that I wished were implemented to a wider extent in Bioshock 1. Other than that, wreaking havoc upon the tea-partiers' paradise ought to be a lot of fun. >> ^Xax:

Perhaps the most impressive trailer I've ever seen for a game, even if it is just a render.
And who cares if Ebert refuses to acknowledge that games are art? That's his error.

Stand still woman!!! Jeeeesus...

And yeah, couldn't take my eyes off her cleavage, you were right

Yeah. "Might".



>> ^Payback:

Do you get to win the puppy?



Edit> OMG, I might be gay.

He's visiting his cousin Major Hooters in Nantucket>> ^bamdrew:

Wait, were is the famous French army officer Major Cleavage? I'm confused

>> ^westy:

she is ruff , i mean i dont get the obsessoin with big tits , ID rather have a woman with small to no tits than large to massive tits. they are just impractical , end up with a girl thats not very limber , cnt do sports and flops all over the place.


So goddamn many places to go with this.

Those are called children westy.

Flopping all over the place may not be a bad thing!

She can't play sports if she's too busy making me dinner anyway.

Large tits can be used as a flotation device in dire emergency needs.

You can't motorboat personality.

ahh..

for the record, i'm actually not a sexist asshole.

Wait, were is the famous French army officer Major Cleavage? I'm confused