There is a reason it looks like a movie... because it was directed by none other than Aussie film director Baz Luhrmann (Strictly Ballroom, Romeo and Juliet, Moulin Rouge)! Just be sure to change the spelling error in your title (Chanel - one N, not two).

Tags for this video have been changed from 'channel, ad, nicole kidman' to 'chanel, ad, nicole kidman, baz luhrmann' - edited by Issykitty

That's ant's job. I don't downvote often. I'm the remove from chanel queen.

In reply to this comment by my15minutes:
Hehe! Admittedly, it's probably not what you were looking for from the 'Sexuality' tag...

Thanks for not downvoting it, at any rate!

In reply to this comment by persephone:
GROSS!!!

joedirt:

unless I'm completely missing something, requeue is not mentioned in the http://www.videosift.com/talk/Welcome-to-VideoSift-30 page. the link to the new invocations there goes to the page I mentioned in my earlier post, which right now does not mention requeue. I recall having seen a description that was a little unclear, but implied that you could extend the queue length of a post, but now it's not there.


I don't get why save and promote are not greyed out for one's own videos when they aren't available. there is complicated logic available for other invocations that affects if they are greyed or not.


weird about the "Terrible" bit. does "election 2008" show up in your alphabetical chanel list? for me, the lack of "terrible" looks like this:

S
Sci-Fi Fandom • Spanning Time • Sports Sift • Standup Comedy

T
The Clouds and Beyond

V
Video (game) Sift






one more bug:
in http://www.videosift.com/talk/Welcome-to-VideoSift-30 it says
"Five applauds of a great comment gives the commenter a star point."

then down in the comments we see that it is impossible to get 5 applauds on a comment when in says
"dag has already been awarded a star point for this post - ignoring quality request by bluecliff."

Those questions were easy, even the celebrity question, since Chanel was the only French last name in the list.

Not too impressed, but I like the extra chanels - I hope that's high on the list of 'new things to add'.... "action" channel!!!!

ok people in usa have crap news but you have to admit at least thay rnt subjected to Cricket, golf , snooker constantly.

untill recently almost everyone in england only had 4 tv chanels and yet so mutch time wud be dedocated to realy tedouse to watch sport. dont get me wrong i love playing these sports but watching them on tv. u can feal u brain driping out of your nose

Whilst I agree that this animation is very good, "What the bleep" is very manipulative, dishonest and misleading.
The woman that runs the cult is channeling someone (Ramtha) that's been dead for 35,000 years, and lived in a mythical city (atlatis) FFS.
http://skeptico.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/ramthawebpic_2.jpg

Here is a great expose on this crap film.
http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/feature/2004/09/16/bleep/index2.html

The only really impressive physicist in the movie had this to say after seeing what they'd done to his recording.

"I was edited in such a way as to completely suppress my actual views about the matters the movie discusses. I am, indeed, profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness. Moreover, I explained all that, at great length, on camera, to the producers of the film ... Had I known that I would have been so radically misrepresented in the movie, I would certainly not have agreed to be filmed."

This movie is indeed an advert for a very kooky cult (Ramtha's cult as chanelled by Judy Knight of Texas). And many of the claims it makes about quantum physics are not scientifically based, despite the psuedo-scientific bullshit they surround it with.

Sorry if this is a little strongly worded, but this kind of mass manipulation makes me angry, and the world is so god damned credulous!