The votes it does have are undeserved, as I stole it from an image of Patrick Stewart.

It's obvious Trev has the same talented writers, but I sure hope he finds his groove soon or they're going to have to bring back Stewart. I'm giving him a long benefit of the doubt because he's replacing Daily Show perfection, but he needs to grab a hold of something. Make it his.

The material is there, but his delivery is... meh... his standup is excellent. I wonder if he's someone who requires a lot of rehearsal to get the nuances in sync.

Not to mention Jon isn't afraid to call out people--even CNN on its own show @eric3579 If Stewart didn't make this call, it is his duty to those passed over to raise a stink.

That is at least IMO.

I recorded and watched his series finale. It was weak compared to other late night talk shows including Jay Leno's! Where is Jon Stewart going?

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

It might be good, but it won't be back. This was really the Jon Stewart Show - and that's gone.

Stephen Colbert And Jon Stewart Daily Show Last Episode has been added as a related post - related requested by eric3579 on that post.

Jon Stewart's Last 'Bulls**t' Rant On 'The Daily Show' has been added as a related post - related requested by eric3579.

Mad love for Jon . Farewell, you are soooo one of the good guys *promote

Full final episode http://thedailyshow.cc.com/full-episodes/pjkw01/august-6--2015---jon-stewart-s-final-episode

Me too. I know a lot of people made a big deal of Letterman finishing, but to me, Jon Stewart is far more important.

At least we still have John Oliver.

http://videosift.com/video/Jon-Stewarts-Secret-Meetings-With-Obama

So it's not playing in my country, so I remembered that there was a way to report to Siftie that a video was region blocked, and hovered over the Invocations help tag aaaaand....

Comments #7 and #8

*promote

Jon Stewart. The most trusted man in Fake News.

*dead

Apparently, Jon Stewart is all about racial justice when it's good for his brand, but he couldn't give a shit when he can do something about it in his very own business.

Fuck this unfunny clown.

Guess he has a false idea what "news" is.

He must be watching MSNBC John Stewart .

It isn't defining other peoples relationships. It is defining something tangible based on a universal. But that's an old subject between us.

And I didn't coin the Nazi reference, nor the cockersucker one, in that those were oldie but goodies from Stewart himself as he made fun of conservative pundits, as was implied by the previous paragraph--almost spelled it out actually.

Also, you had quoted Chaos and I was saying directly to him that he had implied it was learned behavior. Now I am not sure...did you think I meant the Stewart video?

You are saying I ignored the subtext, but that would infer that what you interpret is in fact what is being written between the lines. Perhaps someone should ask Stewart what his position is on polygamists marrying prior to attacking him based on a subjective interpretation of what he said?

I have no cards in the game so to speak, I'm straight and "conventionally" married (for whatever that is worth), but I 100% support the right to marriage equality for people able to legally consent. I'm not a Stewart fanboy and I don't believe he is infallible, but I just do not see your interpretation in what was said (and what wasn't). We obviously have a difference of opinion, and think each other incorrect, but that's cool as well, we aren't required to agree. But saying 'it's completely obvious and if you don't see it my way, don't bother replying' is a cop out... Never mind adding Nazi's and an inferred cocksucking insult. You going for a world record of logical fallacies in one post? \= )

Irt marriage in general, my point wasn't that the institution itself was perfect, it's that every couple should be allowed to define their relationship on their own terms without anyone else stepping in to define it for them. Yes, it's a contract, but like any contract we choose to enter in to, we have to be satisfied by the terms of it. That it can be toxic is stating the obvious, but that's neither here nor there irt the topic at hand.

As to whether monogamy is a natural state, that's kinda irrelevant to the topic at hand.

And my naughtiness? \= )

"but monogamy is inconvenient for damn near everyone who practices it."

How is this not defining other people's relationships? That statement is pretty unequivocal. Not really much to be inferred there. ; )