At least he's not genetically modified like spiderman.

I really getting tired of remake after remake after remake. But my biggest pet peeve is in my personal opinion STOP REMAKING ORIGIN STORIES! we get it, we know it, lets move on!

They are rebooting Superman and starting with the Origin story, it's been done to death

this spiderman origin story, they did origin story for xmen first class, even down to kid show remakes, the new thundercats cartoon starts over with the origin again.

I would love for once, instead of origin story we get a freaking continuation. A "Where are they now" you can call it. Like for spiderman let the first 3 stay in canon, then ok fine new actors I understand that part totally, but continue the story you dont have to add part 4 to it, but just continue, we know the origin already from the 60's live action tv show, the old 80's cartoons, the 90's remake of the cartoons, the movies, etc.

hehe yea I could rant forever about it, but it's just a pet peeve of mine. I really hate remakes of origin stories, I hated it with batman remake of the origin story and I don't think I'll ever like remakes of origin stories.

Upvote, of course.

In reply to this comment by RFlagg:
I am conflicted, do I upvote for the sheer terribleness of it all or downvote for f'n over Spider Man or ignore?

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by spoco2.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/The-Amazing-Spiderman-First-Trailer

Hybrid beat you by a couple hours

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Sagemind. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

Glad I'm not the only one in the Dark-Knight-is-overrated category. It had its moments, but it wasn't put together as well as Begins. Always hard to beat the beginning movie (see: Spiderman)

>> ^Hybrid:

Yes. The head of Warner Bros has already said that this film effectively rules out the possibility of making a sequel for it. It's a firm end. He said they will have to reboot... though I'd like to think they'll leave it a few years before they do at least.>> ^ponceleon:
Wait, this implies that this is the end of the Dark Knight movies? What, we need to reboot this shit too?



Why wait? They are already rebooting Spiderman...

The headphones look like Spiderman eyes in the thumb.

>> ^jmd:

retards... best game ever? Jesus are you that droned out on baseball that some dork runs onto the field and you now find something in life worth living for?
Not knocking baseball or anything, but these fans who get excited over THIS have got serious issues with their boring little lives.
And no, He didn't escape.


U mad bro?

You sure told us Donnie Downer McBuzzkill. Looked like a crowd of people out with their friends having a good time. You should look into it sometime...and going outside to yell at the kids on your lawn does't count.>> ^jmd:

retards... best game ever? Jesus are you that droned out on baseball that some dork runs onto the field and you now find something in life worth living for?
Not knocking baseball or anything, but these fans who get excited over THIS have got serious issues with their boring little lives.
And no, He didn't escape.

retards... best game ever? Jesus are you that droned out on baseball that some dork runs onto the field and you now find something in life worth living for?

Not knocking baseball or anything, but these fans who get excited over THIS have got serious issues with their boring little lives.

And no, He didn't escape.

spiderman would approve

i don't feel like there has to be a difference in the rhetoric and the reality. and find that statement kind of cynical.

my kids are allowed all kinds of crazy freedoms with their hair and dress and expression and creativity and language and their interests are almost always highly encouraged by me and my tribe.

princesses weren't a non existant part of playtime when my daughter was younger, at that point i thought it was an archetype and all little girls go through that phase. and i still kind of think that. but i think it can be overly nurtured in ways that are obnoxious. anyway, princess phase was short lived and generally took a back seat to her desire to be a fairy or a piano playing shark. i could think of million reasons to hate barbies, but i decided not to, she has barbies ... she just isnt real interested in them. bratz dolls are actually just amazingly whorey and negative and are just way overboard, so.. fuck no. she's too old for them now anyway.

my biggest issue is over commercialization, so we simply have no television. they watch movies and what not. and actually i feel like limiting the television and commercialization has helped them development loads of creativity. which is actively encouraged around here. it's totally possible to imbue your kids with your values without forcing your political agenda down their throats.

i'm extremely interested in how much of my kids personalities and social skills are due to their lack of exposure to what's "trendy" and how much of it is just inherent. . my niece is the same age as my daughter, she's been hooked on the disney channel since birth. "fitting in" and keeping up with trends and being "like" her peers is extremely important to her. my kid couldn't care less. but that was also the difference between her mom (my sister) and i when we were kids.

i used to worry more about my son being able to fit in with more mainstreamed peers. seeing as we have no television, he knows 0 about spiderman or transformers or sports, he has 0 male role model to emulate and has been raised entirely by a bunch of women. but he's having no trouble "fitting in" with other boys. my daughter on the other hand is having loads of issues with socialization. she has no interest in what other 8 year old girls seem to be interested in. honestly, at this point, if hannah montana would help her make friends, i'd consider getting cable. but she just thinks it's stupid.

i'm interested to know if that's her just being a mature, heavily artistic, tomboy, with a dose of shyness or if the persona's of little girls are just so entirely shaped by television and trends that she's finding it impossible to relate them without it. i suspect its probably a bit of both. and i find the latter extremely sad.

>> ^blankfist:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://kids.videosift.com/member/spoco2" title="member since August 21st, 2006" class="profilelink">spoco2, good point. But I'd have to wonder why I'd want to stop him or her from following what they want even if it's trendy. Is it because of how I feel about it? If so, that's not a very good reason at all.
I dislike commercialization like the next guy, but is it fair for me to push my own personal politics onto my child? I say no. Sure, wearing high heels at five may be a bit extreme, but most parents use those extreme examples as justification to stifle their children's self-expression at less extremes. In other words, the rhetoric is "my five year old daughter is not wearing heels" but then in reality it's "my ten year old son is not getting a faux-hawk/mohawk" or "my daughter is not getting a Barbie doll".