you know put aside any issues anyone might have with OJ. If a judge was sentencing me to 15years in jail I would think she could at least not pause to suck down whatever was in that cup.. show some kind of professionalism

O.J. Simpson gets at least 15 years in prison

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/12/05/oj.simpson.sentencing/?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail

Oh absolutely. That's as worthy video of a promote as I've ever seen. Love that commercial.

In reply to this comment by Sarzy:
Thanks, videosiftbannedme. That's the first video I ever submitted, and still one of my favourites.

In reply to this comment by videosiftbannedme:
*promote - so everyone gets their OJ on a Sunday morning.

*promote - so everyone gets their OJ on a Sunday morning.

>> ^Trancecoach:
^Name ONE instance (with video link, if possible) of liberals using the race card. Name ONE, BillO.
(I will accept your silence as an admission of your ignorance.)
And Shields, here, deserves credit for not demanding that the women wait on him hand and foot. He really does.


Well, I'd consider Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Reverend Wright, OJ Simpson, Hillary, and many others guilty of playing the race card.

Show me where I'm wrong, son.

1) Season - dog season, it's always dog season
2) Place in the world - doghouses
3) Children's book - Dogbert goes to the store
4) TV Series - Dog Whisperer
5) Word - Doggles
6) Film - All Dogs Go To Heaven
7) Curse - Doggone it!
Creature - Dog
9) Past time - taking my dog for walks
10)Person - Rolph from the muppets

Which one?

11) Dog or cat - Cat
12) Sweet or savoury - salty
13) Cereal or Toast - toasted cereal
14) Tan or pale - farmers tan
15) Shoes or barefoot - shoes with bare toes
16) Desktop or laptop - laptop on a desk
17) Drive or walk - ghostride = both
18) Drama or comedy - steven seagal does both
19) Sex or food - foodstamps
20) Futurama or Simpsons - hey dad, can i borrow the handgun?

The Sift

21) Your fave personal submission - see any of my fine 49
22) A great comment on one of your vids - "Oprah takes a dive" by gwizz
23) Most off the wall member - westy
24) Favourite user name - westy
25) Your most used channel - WTFFFFFFFF
26) Personal dumbass moment - hahahaha
27) Best avatar - John Goodman, clearly
28) Partner in crime - westy, though he doesn't know
29) Do people offline know of your sift problem - no one still alive
30) Idea for the site - gimme 90's channel that I would care for like my own child

About you

31) Where do you live - in a big warehouse where dogs run loose, machines make noise and anything can happen
32) Smoker/non-smoker - plz see username
33) Left or right handed - I save the world with all 4 appendages
34) Hair colour - green, hello
35) Relationship status - I have 5 "close friends"
36) How tall - 6' 5" after I butchwax my 'do
37) Children - you are all my children
38) Ever had an operation - yes, i completed them all in 30 mintues too
39) Best feature - my voiceover
40) Use four words to describe yourself - By your powers combined...

If you could...what, who, when etc

41) Bring a famous person back from the dead - Princess Di
42) Give 50 grand to any charity - OJ is still innocent fund
43) Send someone on a one way ticket to the moon - Princess Di
44) Relive a moment in your life - with my DVR, I relive them all
45) Have a superpower - mine are Superhuman strength, speed and stamina, Flight, Invulnerability, Super-breath, Telepathy, Psychokinesis, Shape-shifting, Control over the elements, Matter transmutation
46) Find out one thing you've always wanted to know - who crashed the exxon-valdez
47) Have the opposite gender deal with something you have to - big oil
48) Be president for one hour - I'd consume the EPA
49) Delete a period in history - every time someone litters
50) Achieve one thing - make a television comeback

Hey, SiftBot. Make like OJ and *kill.

http://www.videosift.com/video/This-time-the-jury-pwns-one-OJ-Simpson

>> ^imstellar28:
^therealblankman,
A person should be convicted on the evidence against them, not on the prejudice of the jurors. Whether that prejudice is based on race, gender, religion, clothes, profession, fame, or appearance. Many jurors, for example, would probably be biased if they saw a defendant who had tattoos, was unshaven, and looked pretty mean. A persons appearance (age, gender, style, race, etc.) should have no bearing on the trial, so why even include it as a variable?
Likewise for the name of the accused. Who you are should have nothing to do with your guilt or innocence. In this case, OJ is associated with murder, and no matter how impartial a juror tries to be, that prejudice is going to exist. If the defended was obscured from view and his name hidden, jurors would be forced to consider only the evidence and not whatever personal biases they may have.
When a juror doesn't know if they are convicting an old grandma, a 19 year old minority, an NFL football player, or a middle aged white guy, they would be forced to consider the evidence more carefully.
Also: when I said "not really how the justice system is supposed to work" I meant people shouldn't be punished more harshly because the juror thinks they "got away with" a previous crime.


It is kind of hard to orginize a public trial with all those conditions

I am a fan of justice, but perfect justice can never be had, just have to get as close as we can.

@imstellar28-

you're right! how DARE they put OJ behind bars! THEY MUST BE RACIST!!

^therealblankman,

A person should be convicted on the evidence against them, not on the prejudice of the jurors. Whether that prejudice is based on race, gender, religion, clothes, profession, fame, or appearance. Many jurors, for example, would probably be biased if they saw a defendant who had tattoos, was unshaven, and looked pretty mean. A persons appearance (age, gender, style, race, etc.) should have no bearing on the trial, so why even include it as a variable?

Likewise for the name of the accused. Who you are should have nothing to do with your guilt or innocence. In this case, OJ is associated with murder, and no matter how impartial a juror tries to be, that prejudice is going to exist. If the defended was obscured from view and his name hidden, jurors would be forced to consider only the evidence and not whatever personal biases they may have.

When a juror doesn't know if they are convicting an old grandma, a 19 year old minority, an NFL football player, or a middle aged white guy, they would be forced to consider the evidence more carefully.

Also: when I said "not really how the justice system is supposed to work" I meant people shouldn't be punished more harshly because the juror thinks they "got away with" a previous crime.

>> ^imstellar28:
not really how the justice system is supposed to work.
they should exclude the names/identities of defendants during trials. or even go so far as to physically separate the jury/defendants so that race/gender/appearance is unknown.


That is one of the strangest opinions about the legal system I've ever read. Care to elaborate?

Is the black guard behind him hyperventilating? Does he think OJ was railroaded?

>> ^quantumushroom:
Teh Rougy came here to my submitted sift and insulted me with uncreative vulgarity. I countered by pointing out something reflected in his posts: he's sympathetic to or an actual 9-11 'truther', the political equivalent of those who say OJ Simpson was framed.
Shuac is right, it's funny; harmful only to overly sensitive humorless leftists. Have you no faith in your marxist messiah?


You are one of the most dispicable souls I've ever come across on the internet. Our country is in a world of hurt precisely because of people like you and your politics, yet you are the very first to accuse anybody who disagrees with you of being a traitor or of being a communist.

You deserve every insult, and worse.

Cry baby.

You know QM, You have to be a republican strategist, because if you cant attack a persons comment, you go after their character, or previous comments (whether relevant or not) in an effort to discredit them.

Teh Rougy came here to my submitted sift and insulted me with uncreative vulgarity. I countered by pointing out something reflected in his posts: he's sympathetic to or an actual 9-11 'truther', the political equivalent of those who say OJ Simpson was framed.

Shuac is right, it's funny; harmful only to overly sensitive humorless leftists. Have you no faith in your marxist messiah?