https://imgur.com/gallery/XqMLD70

https://imgur.com/gallery/Z9RrsrW

It’s not hip hop you moron. https://imgur.com/gallery/zTdw7sF

https://imgur.com/gallery/kOvcErv

=]

Sorry, I only saw your question now. I think i saw it on imgur the first time https://imgur.com/gallery/WSBBL2X and then looked for the video on youtube. I must say that it fooled me at first then I noticed how they were walking in relation to the road and realised it was CG

Hospital food someone received in Japan after giving birth. Same in Croatia, via comment.

It does not have to be about fitting into gamut, pink is a combination of blue and red light, which monitors are good at.

The problem with real world materials is that perception is not as simple as that. The combination of reflected, refracted, and even radiated (transformed wavelength) and polarized light, the micro-structure of the surface and possibly other properties can influence perception.

Like your favourite washing powder makes your whites whiter, this stuff makes pinks look pinker somehow. Its about fooling your eyes in specific conditions. You can simulate the difference between a known pink - a standard colour sample - and this awesome new pink by putting them side by side and calibrating the camera and monitor to show the new pink as pink and the reference pink as less pink, like at the end of the video, but that cant beat walking into an art gallery and seeing it with your own eyes. I mean probably, I havent seen this particular pink, but I have seen modern paintings which look nothing like their RGB or CMYK reproductions.

You have an exhibit that is worth a bunch of money, you allow people to freely wander through it, and no cunt thinks to bolt down tall pedestals with little ground contact area?!??!?

Can't really feel bad for the gallery/artist at this point.

To be fair, she may have destroyed/damaged the first piece, but the potential energy used to damage the other 9 or so pieces was generated by whoever set up the gallery like that.

https://imgur.com/gallery/M9Vgqv9

I am confused. Why wasn't the crab armed with a knife? Most photos I have seen of crabs has them weilding a knife.

http://imgur.com/gallery/tgUUHs9

Yup; here is the Live Science take---in brief--it's a conceptual artist's thing (Vitaly Bulgarov) who has faked a website and even the Korea development company...

"New video clips purporting to show a 13-foot-tall (4 meters) humanoid robot piloted by a person in its torso look like something straight out of "Avatar" or "Transformers," but a Live Science investigation has revealed reasons to believe some skepticism might be in order.

The robot clips have been picked up by a variety of online news and technology outlets, including Kotaku and Wired UK. But the South Korean company that is supposedly developing the robot has virtually no online presence and was unfamiliar to robotics researchers contacted by Live Science.

Furthermore, the only source for the videos or any information about them is the Facebook and Instagram pages of a designer whose website mentions a conceptual art project about a "fictional robotics corporation that develops its products in a not-so-distant future."

The designer, Vitaly Bulgarov, told Live Science that the robot is real. However, he declined to share the names of scientists or engineers working on the project, and messages to the purported CEO of the company went unreturned. [Gallery: See Images of the Giant Humanoid Robot]

Mystery business

According to Bulgarov's Facebook page, the videos were taken in South Korea at a company called Korea Future Technology. Almost all references to this company online appear to be associated with Bulgarov's posts and the subsequent news pieces on the robot. Bulgarov said the company has been operating for several years."

""Robots are messy business," said Christian Hubicki, a postdoctoral robotics researcher at Georgia Tech who worked on the DURUS robot. "They get torn apart and put back together over and over, and transmission grease gets all over the place. Even the nice white floor is beautifully unscuffed [in these videos]. Never once during likely hundreds of hours of debugging the giant robot did it kick in a way that scratched it up?"

The people around the robot also appear to be too close for safety and are not following the standard practice of wearing safety goggles, Hubicki said.

Bulgarov said the company's CEO required that the lab be clean, and that the videos had been brightened in postproduction. Fearing said robotics labs in Asia can be relatively neat.

However, there's another problem: Hubicki told Live Science that the robot's leg joints look unusually smooth given the force that the step of a 1.5-ton robot would exert on the motors. [5 Reasons to Fear Robots]"

http://www.livescience.com/57296-giant-humanoid-robot-video-hoax.html

http://imgur.com/gallery/rVt12br

Sorry, I had to blow the planet up...

Shits on fire, yo.

http://imgur.com/gallery/6NfmQ

There has never been a good video on this person or his work...his book-published works and Art Gallery exhibitions are breathtaking.