Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Really? You honestly haven't heard that? I've heard it many times, especially when I lived in California. Sometimes, if Atheists or Agnostics are bothered by the outcome of some morally significant legislation, they pull the "separation" doctrine out like it has some type of relevance. I'm too lazy to find a source, but I promise that I'm not making this stuff up.

In reply to this comment by entr0py:
>> ^thepinky:
I am very much in support of people who are gay, but I am slightly sick of hearing that when people make voting decisions based on their beliefs, they are somehow violating the "separation of church and state" doctrine.


Really, you've heard people make that argument more then once? Enough times to make you sick of it? If you can find some example that would be awesome, because it seems like a straw man to me.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Had to dupe your video. http://www.videosift.com/video/Glenn-Beck-Asks-Innappropriate-Question. It had ridiculously bad tags, so I'm not surprised you didn't find it.

*yawn

In reply to this comment by entr0py:
That was a somewhat interesting medical curiosity ruined by unbelievably irritating presentation. Just sayin'

hey, you know you can vote for your own sifts... go on, it´s okay...

http://www.videosift.com/video/Gmod-Arena-Billy-Mays-VS-Vance

In reply to this comment by entr0py:
Actually the judges are right. It's a little known fact that singularities were originally termed "bad holes". It was Stephen Hawking that popularized the euphemism "black hole". Stephen Hawking, as we all know, is the world's most notorious white supremacist cyborg cosmologist.

This is one of the greatest comment I've ever read.

that was a *quality link. please post it in the sifttalk section (under politics)

In reply to this comment by entr0py:
The thing that upsets me most is that the majority of the congress is complicit in allowing this to pass. We have to expect this sort of thing from Bush, but why are the Democrats helping him? The law "being rushed through" isn't an excuse for it so easily passing in a democratic congress. I see it as a failure by those who voted for it and didn't understand it, and a betrayal by those those who voted for knowing it's contents.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=s110-1927

That "Very Hungry Kitten" video that you submitted is the funniest thing ever! I think I've been watching it at least twice a day since. Hahaha!