eatbolt
Member Profile
Real Name: Rory B. Bellows
Birthdate: April 26th, 1979 (45 years old)
Birthdate: April 26th, 1979 (45 years old)
A little about me...
Member Since: February 22, 2007
Last Power Points used: June 12, 2010
Available: now
Power Points at Recharge: 1 Get More Power Points Now!
I am made out of exactly 311 golden babies.
Member Since: February 22, 2007
Last Power Points used: June 12, 2010
Available: now
Power Points at Recharge: 1 Get More Power Points Now!
11 Comments
Happy anniversary! Today marks year number 4 since you first became a Sifter and the community is better for having you. Thanks for your contributions!
Your video, Russell Peters - World Cup - Stand Up, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
Congratulations on reaching new heights on VideoSift. You have earned yourself 25 stars, earning you status of Bronze Star member. You have been awarded 1 Power Point for achieving this level. Thanks for all your contributions.
That's just it though, he doesn't do a good job of covering up the fact that he's suspicious of them. They would have immediately knew something was up when he was so insistent with his line of questioning. Since no red flags went up, and they just went on their merry way (never saying anything like "I think he's onto us" when he OBVIOUSLY is) THAT is why this movie is such a fuck up. These characters are just talking to hear themselves talk and not reacting the way the characters in the situation most likely would have.
In reply to this comment by eatbolt:
Once you understand Landa's hiden intention in this scene, his laugh is priceless. He knows what they're up to and his discovery at how inept they are is priceless. I love how he fucks with them with he asks them to say things in Italian.
I remember watching this scene the first time around thinking that if he didn't pick up on how bad their impressions are, the earlier scenes of him toying with his prey wouldn't make any sense. Then the plot thickens...
Damn. What a movie.
Your video, TimeRemap - Insane visual effects - Must watch, has made it into the Top 20 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.
No problem - if you look under the title of your video, you'll see "modify video details" - click on that and you can change it from there.
In reply to this comment by eatbolt:
Thanks for the catch! I can't figure out where to change the title. Do you know if it's possible to edit the titles once the vids are posted?
In reply to this comment by evil_disco_man:
Hello, just wanted to mention there's a misspelling in the title and tags of your recent video - should read "Quixote." Great sift!
Hello, just wanted to mention there's a misspelling in the title and tags of your recent video - should read "Quixote." Great sift!
hell. yes.
In reply to this comment by eatbolt:
If you like the premise of the movie, I recommend Harlan Ellison's short story, "The Prowler in the City at the Edge of the World" It's a great Jack-the-Ripper story, with lots of creepy Ellison bits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prowler_in_the_City_at_the_Edge_of_the_World
In reply to your comment:
"2. that it doubtfull [sic] that shimmer [sic] will prove theories acupuncture and life energy wrong." Of course he won't prove them wrong. To assume he can prove something wrong is a logical fallacy. It formally called, "The fallacy of appealing to lack of proof of the negative"
It's not on Shermer to prove their theories are wrong, it's on the acupuncturists to prove them to be right. To prove a negative, a person would have to be able to account for every moment and every location throughout the history of the entire universe to say definitively "That never happened anywhere, ever." Someone could say, "Santa Claus exists." I say, "No. He doesn't." They say, "Prove it." That's a fallacy. It's not on me to prove (or disprove) your claim. I'm not the one making it. I could just point to the person's lack of evidence and be done with it. I don't need to disprove Aliens abducted you. You have to prove it to me since you are making the assertion. That's where the burden lay.
what ever
Send eatbolt a Comment...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.