Yeah, aren't they great? I can't believe he did the entire movie!

In reply to this comment by Jordass:
Ironically I was just trying to post one of these when I found yours. I wish they had the whole thing in a video it was hillarious.

Just type this in a comment for the video:

*discard

And hit <enter> like at the end of any other comment, and it will be discarded. Siftbot won't automatically discard it unless it fails to receive 10 votes in 4 days, so either you'll have to do it or a gold star member or above will have to do it for you.

In reply to this comment by Jordass:
Thanks, how do I discard it? Or do I let siftbot do it?

In reply to this comment by CaptWillard:
Sorry, Jordass, but it's a duplicate:

http://www.videosift.com/video/Minesweeper-the-movie

Yes, it's a scary time, because the Executive Branch is acting outside the powers given to them by the Constitution. The President cannot make treaties with other countries without the Senate's approval. Currently, these deals between the US, Canada and Mexico are being passed off as trade agreements, not treaties. But a dissolution of our borders is not a trade agreement.

Welcome to the sift, by the way.

In reply to this comment by Jordass:
Wasnt endorsing Globalization just wanted to know more. Thanks for all the information, it was very informative and more people should familiarize themseleves with the organizations you metioned

In reply to this comment by blankfist:
Well, the reason for the US Dollar losing it's value is a separate issue, altogether, and we don't need a North American Union to increase its value. That aside, this debate really comes down to whether you'd prefer to remain a sovereign nation or not. The borders between Canada, the US and Mexico will effectively disappear if there's a NAU, because the NAU goes much further than just currency and trade. The purpose of our Declaration of Independence was to claim our Union of States' independence. The NAU will render that document obsolete, and shortly thereafter the Constitution would be obsolete, because it cannot exist without our DoI. This isn't something to shrug at, because the changes won't come hard and fast, and most likely the general population would never notice their liberties and freedoms being taken away.

If you'd prefer the notion of a one world government (the true end to the globilization means), then you should be for the NAU, because that is step number two. Step number one was the EU, and next will be the Asian Union, then the African Union. Eventually, all of the "Unions" will probably become a one world union. And, if you still think all the nations that used to be sovereign would retain their "current governments" or "identities", as you put it, then I don't know what else I can say to you other than support globalization because, boy oh boy, does it sound nifty.

Take a little time to research the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the North American Free Trade Agreement, (NAFTA), and the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). While you're at it, research the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and see how many of the current candidates are part of the CFR. If, after all of that, you still don't see how globalization is a bad idea for our sovereign nation, then, well support globalization. Support a one world government. A one world police force. Oh, what a happier utopia this world will be.

that was a hilarious comment

In reply to this comment by Jordass:
I was really hoping this was a parody, I was really hoping that it was fake. Now my soul has died a little more to where ill have to watch the cats&dogs channel for the next hour just so i dont kill myself

and i just left a reply,

In reply to this comment by Jordass

yup. good picks, j.

Congrats on getting your first video onto the sift. You picked a winner in my book. JCS rocks. Keep on siftin.