Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Babymech (Member Profile)
Only in the sense that, like the jews, SJWs are a menace that must be ruthlessly opposed and ultimately, happily, exterminated.
I hope you don't find that offensive at all.
I don't know you, so I have to ask - is that an intentional hint you're giving us that so-called social justice warriors are really Jew vermin? Because that would be fascinating.
koonnamchok
(Member Profile)
*spammer
Stonebreaker
(Member Profile)
Every time I see your username I hear this song.
STÖRTEBEKER!
chicchorea
(Member Profile)
I think your triumphalism is somewhat unseemly.
Sabre
(Member Profile)
You are a demented fascist.
I say we have a strong contender to be on the TSA No-Fly List here. + a couple of other lists i can think off. I'll just forward this to the tip line, they can decide if your as crazy as you seem. Better safe than sorry I always say.
Sabre
(Member Profile)
I think it's noble to do whatever little you can to oppose the brutal half-century long occupation, humiliation, starvation and assassination of your people, yes.
Israel is an illegal occupying power in international law, that's a fact. It constantly violates practically every obligation that occupation incurs in international law; it engages in collective punishment, it regularly seizes and destroys private property, it laughingly fails to provide for the safety and welfare of the population under its control, it settles occupied territory with its civilians, it forcibly relocates Palestinian civilians, it routinely ignores the UN's attempts to restrain these and other illegal behaviours, these are facts.
Israel is engaged in terrorism in Gaza and elsewhere, and has been for decades - fact.
You actively admit supporting terrorist organisations? Why stop at Hamas then, you can’t have double standards now can you. Here I’ll help you:
"There are no terrorist targets in Iraq. Occupied people have a right to resist, both ethically and under international law. Al-Qaida rocket fire/suicide bombings isn't terrorism, it isn't war, but a ghetto uprising; just as doomed and just as noble."
Do you think it’s noble to fire rockets out of hospitals hiding behind defenceless civilians?
The whole world expect Russia,Turkey and China sees Hamas as a terrorist organisation, maybe you should consider moving from the UK gorilla warfare man.
Coulthard on team orders
The wonderful thing about insulting people is, the smart ones never take the slightest notice or offense.
Ohhh internet insults. Excuse me while I go cry in the corner from your cutting insight into my very soul.
We're done here.
Coulthard on team orders
Would you say drawing random hands of cards is what makes poker interesting?
Racing, by whatever limited definition I assume you're using that excludes all application of intellect, isn't one tenth of Formula 1.
Actually attending the events, incidentally, is quite the wrong way to appreciate the complexities of the game. It seems to me that you're nothing more than a shallow, gawping spectacle-whore.
Well, that's a useful and well though out comment.
Racing is what makes F1 interesting, and quite frankly, this kind of bullshit is exactly why it's viewership is declining.
I used to be a huge F1 fan. I've actually been to two grand prix (Hungarian and German) and even I don't really watch it anymore.
Coulthard on team orders
Strategy is what makes F1 more interesting to watch than other sports, which are typically just a bunch of sweaty morons running around on a lawn.
Team orders have always been a good thing and people who don't like them are intellectually and morally subhuman.
A10anis
(Member Profile)
Notwithstanding that you weren't looking for a reply, I ought at least to acknowledge my debt to you for correcting my spelling. It's always gratifying to see the lower orders of humanity display sudden and unlooked-for hints of intelligence - just like watching a monkey light a cigar.
I won't bore you with my inexplicably punctuated "opinions", knowing that "facts" and "rational thought" are always anathema to such as you. Only take my thanks in the spirit of fellowship and understanding with which they are intended.
No, actually it is humans who are stupid, unhygienic (your spelling has been amended), annoying and dangerous. If there is climate change, humans are the cause. Imagine wasting chemo on the likes of you! Finally; humans are violent criminals who take resources away from fellow humans to make a buck. Vets alleviate the suffering imposed on animals by some of those humans.
PS; your tag "gorillaman" does that mean you respect at least one of our genetic cousins, or do you wish to kill off every animal you deem as useless? I am being rhetorical, feel free to keep your simplistic, childlike "opinions" to yourself. Unless, of course, you are a troll. In which case you have succeeded in getting at least one response.
direpickle
(Member Profile)
In reply to this comment by direpickle:
*dead
Fixed, thanks!
xxovercastxx
(Member Profile)
Any sample of white people, really, given the methodology.
But actually every human who has ever lived is related to every other human who has ever lived. Also, everything else that is alive on earth.
In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
So you're saying this is roughly the same results you'd get from any sampling of Americans?
xxovercastxx
(Member Profile)
Maths.
In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
How should we have already known? How did you already know?
bananafone (Member Profile)
>> ^bananafone:
I was being sarcastic with the effeminate/inferior thing (well, mostly). What you're doing is the opposite of slut-shaming. It's sad.
Some people just aren't into some things. Mystery solved.
>> ^gorillaman:
This guy does want sex, and he wants it with this girl, he just not willing to be cool about it and have the threeway. My point, as much as I had one and wasn't just being whimsical, is that he's an idiot, not that he's effeminate and therefore inferior.
I get you now. I guess I wouldn't be too pleased if someone told me, "So your girlfriend wants to shit on your chest, just be cool about."
I do wish people would be a bit more sexual and drop some of their hang-ups, but I was being somewhat dogmatic.
bananafone (Member Profile)
>> ^bananafone:
>> ^gorillaman:
I don't get it. I suggest I'd be up for a threeway with another guy and the conclusions you draw from that are 1. I'm repressed and 2. I'm a homophobe?
Actually it's a different kind of bigotry. A much more pervasive one. Guys who don't want sex are seen as inferior since it's supposed to be women who don't want sex. And we can't have men acting like women.
This guy does want sex, and he wants it with this girl, he just not willing to be cool about it and have the threeway. My point, as much as I had one and wasn't just being whimsical, is that he's an idiot, not that he's effeminate and therefore inferior.