LOLOLLO1OL that's all you got? that's your play?

take your weak ass game home, сын.

Unless it bombs at the theater! Oh wait, it's on Disney+.....

Love Maslany in Orphan Black. Gotta support a fellow canuck and an actress with serious acting chops. I'm all in on this.

Weak-ass dudes like me be damned. Hail to the lady in green!

I've been pretty clear that I think it is important to understand the perspective of the police in these situations.

One could make an argument about how they are justified about having guns drawn, since they are replying to a call concerning someone walking around with a gun, and maybe the truck could be mistaken for a gun.

But, at best, that leaves the cop that shot him with a real weak ass argument: "I mistook something he was holding for a gun. I didn't get close enough to see if it was a gun, despite the standoff being very calm. I also didn't maneuver to a position that gave me a proper shooting lane on the suspect. I then accidently discharged my weapon, and hit an innocent party, who was lying on the ground in an non threatening and submissive manner." Sorry, but if that is the best argument you have, you're pretty much fucked.

Yeah, that's about the mentality I expect from PETA. Fucking idiots.
Not all birds are raised in factory farms.
Her weak ass motherfucking 'meal' would probably make me hurl. Tofu wrapped in homemade what? Could it be, perhaps, maybe, SATAN!? (Time to do my superior dance) Disgusting.
I'll also stick to dead birds and butthole bread.

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@harpom & @BoneRemake
Cry me a river. The ideas you have about this are dumb.
Your brains apparently don't understand the concept of context and severity.
First, "the burning sensations of wasabi are not oil-based, they are short-lived compared to the effects of chili peppers, and are washed away with more food or liquid. The sensation is felt primarily in the nasal passage and can be quite painful depending on amount taken."
[i.e. - digestion isn't a problem. the kid won't have an upset tummy or burning curry butthole later]
Furthermore, "Wasabi is a Japanese horseradish which can range from dangerously spicy to mildly spicy."
Therefore. If you start with a small amount of weak wasabi and mix it with soy sauce or the like, what you get is.. SOMETHING NOT THAT HOT/SPICY.
[plus that baby is wearing american flags on his pajamas which means it probably wasn't even TRUE wasabi. i.e. some weak ass horseradish paste]
Second, this probably isn't the first time these parents have done this since the baby doesn't seem too surprised and he takes it well. They probably knew the outcome.
Third, they didn't force the kid to finish it like THIS terrible shitty mother.
So again, context [knowing your kid can handle it] and severity [not forcing a fistful of wasabi on the kid].


Sorry Dr. Kilpatrick, i did not realize i was quoting a pediatric. You must have a vast superior knowledge of infant/toddler physiology. How about you put wasabi in one eye and lemon in the other and let us know which one hurts more.

@harpom & @BoneRemake

Cry me a river. The ideas you have about this are dumb.

Your brains apparently don't understand the concept of context and severity.

First, "the burning sensations of wasabi are not oil-based, they are short-lived compared to the effects of chili peppers, and are washed away with more food or liquid. The sensation is felt primarily in the nasal passage and can be quite painful depending on amount taken."

[i.e. - digestion isn't a problem. the kid won't have an upset tummy or burning curry butthole later]

Furthermore, "Wasabi is a Japanese horseradish which can range from dangerously spicy to mildly spicy."

Therefore. If you start with a small amount of weak wasabi and mix it with soy sauce or the like, what you get is.. SOMETHING NOT THAT HOT/SPICY.

[plus that baby is wearing american flags on his pajamas which means it probably wasn't even TRUE wasabi. i.e. some weak ass horseradish paste]

Second, this probably isn't the first time these parents have done this since the baby doesn't seem too surprised and he takes it well. They probably knew the outcome.

Third, they didn't force the kid to finish it like THIS terrible shitty mother.

So again, context [knowing your kid can handle it] and severity [not forcing a fistful of wasabi on the kid].

>> ^TangledThorns:

More lies from MSDNC, Palin was invited. Hopefully she'll run for president and end Obama's weak ass reign as president.


Old invites are good too! I showed up at my friend's house after he had sold it, but I got kicked out! The nerve!

"weak ass reign"

That's an oddly amusing way to arrange words. Thanks for all that.

More lies from MSDNC, Palin was invited. Hopefully she'll run for president and end Obama's weak ass reign as president.

I dunno, you can see his feet twitch around at about :45...>> ^MaxWilder:

>> ^DrewNumberTwo:
We see a man sitting in a chair for 4 seconds before he is immobilized by the police. How exactly did you determine that he has mobility issues? For all we know, he could have just thrown the owner of the wheelchair to the ground and ridden his chair down the block. And let me kick start your imagination regarding reasons to body slam him: He was armed with a knife, or a stun gun, or an extending baton, or a gun, or brass knuckles, or just his own knuckles. He was assaulting the officers, or bystanders, or family members, or children. He was resisting arrest for an extended period of time, or trying to evade the officers. Again, we have HALF THE STORY at best.

He has mobility issues. Clue number 1: HE NEVER MOVES HIS LEGS.
Like I said, I don't like choosing a side when we have only half the story, but common sense leads me to side against the two officers body-slamming a skinny old dude. If he had just thrown somebody from the scooter, where is that person? If he had a weapon, why are the officers not seen putting an object into evidence?
The reaction of the crowd and the behavior of the officers after the take-down indicates that the worst thing that the guy could have done was mouth off and maybe take a weak-ass swing at one of them.
I'm certainly open to other possibilities, but you gotta come up with something realistic. I was the one throwing out possibilities for the video where a cop tackles a teenage girl, but this crosses even my line of acceptable police precaution.

>> ^DrewNumberTwo:

We see a man sitting in a chair for 4 seconds before he is immobilized by the police. How exactly did you determine that he has mobility issues? For all we know, he could have just thrown the owner of the wheelchair to the ground and ridden his chair down the block. And let me kick start your imagination regarding reasons to body slam him: He was armed with a knife, or a stun gun, or an extending baton, or a gun, or brass knuckles, or just his own knuckles. He was assaulting the officers, or bystanders, or family members, or children. He was resisting arrest for an extended period of time, or trying to evade the officers. Again, we have HALF THE STORY at best.


He has mobility issues. Clue number 1: HE NEVER MOVES HIS LEGS.

Like I said, I don't like choosing a side when we have only half the story, but common sense leads me to side against the two officers body-slamming a skinny old dude. If he had just thrown somebody from the scooter, where is that person? If he had a weapon, why are the officers not seen putting an object into evidence?

The reaction of the crowd and the behavior of the officers after the take-down indicates that the worst thing that the guy could have done was mouth off and maybe take a weak-ass swing at one of them.

I'm certainly open to other possibilities, but you gotta come up with something realistic. I was the one throwing out possibilities for the video where a cop tackles a teenage girl, but this crosses even my line of acceptable police precaution.

what a weak ass trench!

I prefer the NPA on my voter registration card because I dislike the whole "you are either with us or you are against us!" that boils down to the two party system. I've also grown tired of the whole "Democrat libtard" or "Republican conservatard" that at least around where I live is seen far too often. Certainly, its within your free speech rights but when you disagree on principle solely of political party that brings in a whole truckload of stupid.

As far as the election goes, I dont even live in the damn state and it is pretty obvious that Martha Coakley lost because she ran a weak ass campaign. Democrats, stop fidgeting with twisting the healthcare reform bill around for the sake of appeasement. Wake up as a political party, since if we can't get rid of the two-party system at least prove to the rest of us you are different!

Option #2 or #4 could easily apply, but I don't think #5 is a good idea at all. If they can hold out, so can you.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'running, diving, algebra, juice, toddler, inexplicable' to 'running, diving, algebra, juice, toddler, weak ass, inexplicable' - edited by calvados

>> ^Payback:
Just wtf is in his chipotle?


Yeah, no kidding. Chipotle is just a weak-ass smoked jalapeno for people who can't handle real spice. Weak-ass != Blood-Ass...