search results matching tag: video analysis

» channel: motorsports

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.01 seconds

  • 1
    Videos (1)     Sift Talk (1)     Blogs (1)     Comments (4)   

Standing Jump World Record.

braindonut says...

I work on a sports video analysis app in my day job and I see a lot of videos of box jumps coming in from the crossfit crowd. It's pretty impressive stuff and I'm blown away by a lot of the jumps people are pulling off.

The thing that really impresses me about the crossfit crowd is that they aren't just focusing on any one activity. They do everything: olympic weight lifts, tons of varied exercise routines, muscle ups or whatever on those rings, those crazy pullups where they lift their body all the way up, lifting giant stone balls... (atleast, they look like stone balls, I honestly am not yet sure what they are made of)

It's enough to make me get off my ass and stop being so sedentary. I am not sure I'll ever be hardcore enough to roll with that crowd, though.

Stu said:

You're right yogi. If this guy was taller even he could probably get higher. Box jumps are part of my plyometric workout and my highest box I end with is 57 inches. That last 7 and a half inches in a lot respectively but with practice maybe you'll see me on here!

Science and Global Warming

dystopianfuturetoday says...

^But you do 'believe' in scientific consensus. You 'believe' every other conclusion scientific consensus has ever come to. You don't question gravity, or plate tectonics, or photosynthesis, or the reality of the ozone layer, do you?

Why defy science on this lone issue?

Could it have anything to do with the billion dollar PR campaign designed to put these ideas in the public mind?

Video Analysis:

I can't speak to the validity of the science, because I am not a scientist, but I can certainly speak to some of the political manipulation found within this video.

-The video replaces the term 'climate science' with the less accurate, more politically charged term 'global warming'.
-Science is described as 'opinion' to downplay the research that defines it.
-'Public opinion' is put on an equal footing with science.
-The "debate" is framed as one of equals, using the image of two men with cannons firing at each other. In reality, this is science vs. rich guys who don't want to clean up their factories.
-The video pretends to differentiate itself from, and rise above these two warring factions, despite its overt partisanship.
-The video condescendingly reminds scientists of the importance of evidence. WTF?
-At the end, the video reaches conclusions that were not satisfactorily proven, and then displays the image of a judge pounding a gavel in an attempt to invoke the mental frame of officiality and authority in the mind of the viewer.

The debate on this issue has nothing to do with science, it is pure *politics. The scientific process has already reached the consensus that climate change is real, man made and potentially harmful to organic lifeforms. I find it disturbing that you would put politics on an equal footing with science within the context of a scientific debate. Putting your 'belief' in experts is a good thing, and I imagine that outside of this political bizzaro world, you probably do just that.

If you need medical attention, you go to a doctor, not a lawyer.
If you need your car fixed, you go to a mechanic, not a gourmet chef.
If you need information on climate change, you go to climate scientists, not greedy industrialists!

FOX News: Obama "Indoctrinating" Kids

Revised Analysis of Downward Acceleration of WTC 7

StukaFox says...

"I'm a high school teacher"

Correct. What you're not is:

1. A structural engineer specializing in skyscrapers.
2. A mathematician.
3. A Ph.D. in physics.
4. An expert in video analysis.
5. An expert in forensics.
6. An architect.
7. An expert in failure analysis.
8. The guy who designed the building in the first place.

You know who ARE all these things? The people who released the NIST report. The people who had more video than you. The people who put their hands on the steel. The people who interviewed eyewitnesses. The people who ran the labs. The people who ran repeated simulations of the collapse based on models about a million times more complex than your free software and video off the internet.

So what you, and the rest of the chowderheads in the Scooby-Doo Conspiracy Movement, are telling us is that all these people are 1. lying 2. complicit in mass murder and 3. THEY WOULDA GOTTEN AWAY WITH IT IF IT HADN'T BEEN FOR US DARNED KIDS!

Thanks for being tools for Osama, you bags of shit, now go analyze how your heads got shoved so far up your asses.

  • 1


Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon