if someone told me the audio to this video was redubbed on a foley stage, I would believe them.

You must not be a fan of kung fu....or movies like top secret. I am.
I absolutely loved how they did it too, using an existing movie and redubbing and green screening it. I wonder why haven't others done it.

Stupid done right is hilarious.

Typical Bob douchbaggery. Does he know how to do anything else besides trying to be dickish?
I redub thee Cartmanknight33.

Your video, Star Trek Redubbed - Tired of Crazy Train, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Ok, someone needs to redub this with Clarence Boddicker.

Can you fly, Bobby Billy?

Bane was hard to understand even with this redub

Not sure how you managed to watch a dead video and come to that conclusion, but I specifically remember the original. It was one of the earliest videos I ever watched on VS. It was a combination of this video (with the British woman's voiceover, as opposed to the Americanized version redubbed for Discovery or NatGeo which is also here on VS) and this one (also with the same British woman's voiceover). The two are dupes of this one original, as I stated above and on the other dupe.
>> ^albrite30:

Watch the videos. They are in no way in any shape or form, the same video. Different video, different commentator, different quality, not a dupe.

Aside from other obvious aspects of it the most telling thing is that no person would fly that high without safety equipment especially with this kind of device.

other obvious points

1) the body language of the people walking away is really ridged

2) the volume decreases specifcaly so you can hear what the guy says its likely they redubed the sound over the top of the video. ( yet used crap quality film cameras)

3) wings are to small to provide life at such a low forwards momentum and flapping would simply detract from the lift provided.

4) if it was windy enoughf for lift then the guy would start to get lift before he moved ( you will see when birds go to fly if its a windy day extending there wings is prity much all it takes for them to begin flying.

5) you can see that the way he bobs up and down dosent look right at all

6) If you were doing this for real you would film it all with HD camaras and probably get sponsorship from a company to pay for it all.

7) the method of control would be too inprocise even if you went for automated flapping you would use some linear input for the pilot as a human does not have an intuitive sense for how arms should be flapped and then the whole system to translate that would be needlessly complex.

prevouse videos they have made all seem to have stiff acting , sound of the robotics added on top of the video and composited CGI.

>> ^westy:

This is just annoying , Yes its possible for sum one to compose general music around random notes.
seems like a mastabatory celebration of the protentoise interpretation of what a piano is.


These notes are not that random - it's a complete redub. A lot of the note clusters the eye picks up wouldn't make sense in terms of the audio if any of those were actually notes that the baby was playing. The note velocities and pedal work also don't match. Note there's no ambient noise, nor sound of the baby cooing or laughing.

Also, maybe lighten up: it's only a cute baby video.

>> ^DerHasisttot:

If one sees the ads not under the undemocratic banner of banning religion but under the reasonable idea of promoting atheisitc philosophy, they could easily be aired on TV all over the world after redubbing.


So, they'd seem less intolerant if one simple made them less intolerant?

Can't argue with that.

Ads like these are exactly the reason that separation of church and state was started, and there are too many activists who've completely lost sight of that. They see some group pushing a religious agenda, and then jump off the deep end believing that separation of church and state should be used to ban not only those people's actions, but their entire religion.

Church and state where separated for the purpose of STOPPING any particular church from using the state to repress, suppress or outright attack those who don't share their beliefs. In that context and principle, Atheism is just another kind of church, and it's adherents should no more look to ban all other beliefs than any other religion.

Church and state were separated to protect everyone's freedom to choose or not choose whatever religion they wish without the state getting involved. Ads like this undermine that and repeat the ancient evil notion that one groups beliefs are special and should be treated as such by the state.

If one sees the ads not under the undemocratic banner of banning religion but under the reasonable idea of promoting atheisitc philosophy, they could easily be aired on TV all over the world after redubbing.

Amazing video... but what is with that accent of the main protagonist?! Needs a redub.

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by chicchorea.

*isdupe
>> ^Stingray:

dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Star-Wars-Redubbed-1

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Star-Wars-Redubbed-1