why "Nucular" again why?

"nucular" FTW

(@1:50)

"...again, that was an unfair attack, based on verbage that Senator McCain used..."

I do not think that word means what you think it means, Sarah.

Verbiage (if that is the word she was trying to use, not 'verbage' which is a deliberate misspelling to signify garbage data) -noun (1.) overabundance or superfluity of words, as in writing or speech; wordiness; verbosity.

Surely she did not mean to imply that her good running mate was a big bag of wind, did she? First it was "Nucular", now this?!? She has as much verbal-diarhea coming out of her mouth as George "W". How can she hope to master the "old boys network" of Washington if she continues to fail at mastering the English language? Too careless for leadership, where clear, concise communication is paramount!

Besides, any verbiage is well-deserving of an attack, I say.

It bothered me that she didn't know the Bush doctrine, but the only reason he had to unleash the, "Gotcha", was that she tried to BS her way through the question.

CG: "Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?"

SP: [pause, tries to think looks lost] "In what respect Charlie?"

You aren't expected to know everything but BSing your way through the answers is childish when you're a citizen and beyond insanely dangerous when you're an ideologue with the nuclear (or should I say nucular) launch codes.

>> ^moonsammy:
Oh my god... she really did say nucular. NO MORE OF THAT. It isn't a hard word. I can understand mispronouncing February (seriously, who enunciates that first r?) but nuclear is an easy word.

McCain's assistants probably focused on her pronunciation of "Ahmadinejad" and it never occured to them that she might pull a Homer Simpson on Gibson. By the way, didn't McCain's puppet-masters finally acknowledge in May of this year that Khamenei and his groupies were in charge in Iran and not Ahmadinejad? Maybe her instructor didn't get the memo.

And i enunciate the first "r" in February. I think it's quite common if English is your second or third language.

Oh my god... she really did say nucular. NO MORE OF THAT. It isn't a hard word. I can understand mispronouncing February (seriously, who enunciates that first r?) but nuclear is an easy word.

Well, Charlie, I don’t know what the Bush Doctrine is, but I do know how to pronounce nucular.

And, Charlie, we have to keep our eyes on Russia, which I’ve been doing for decades because you can actually see Russia from land, here in Alaska.

That's right, dad gummit! Who needs Senators passing IQ tests? Ptui! Eggheads is what got us into this trouble in the first place! Eggheads like that damn Jimmy Carter with his wimpy, "Energy crisis is the moral equivalent of war" nonsense back in 1979! Who made him the nucular rocket surgeon?

Nuclear, not nucUlar, ya fsckin' doornob.

Thanks to Bush the future is bright: Nucular powered cocanuts will surely help put humans on Mars.

I know, it's SO tempting to go all Keyser Söze on these Philistines.

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
No problem. I should have just used my awesome nucular 500 diamond powers to destroy him and his family.

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Hey, thanks for trying to ban that spamming dickhead at Books Talk the other day. I finished the banning process, so he is no more. Give me a shout out if it happens again. I'm still pretty new at running a channel, and so I forgot to check it for only 1 1/2 days. Lo and behold, a fucking spammer. I never even heard of them spamming the Talk sections before. A learning experience, to be sure.

No problem. I should have just used my awesome nucular 500 diamond powers to destroy him and his family.

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Hey, thanks for trying to ban that spamming dickhead at Books Talk the other day. I finished the banning process, so he is no more. Give me a shout out if it happens again. I'm still pretty new at running a channel, and so I forgot to check it for only 1 1/2 days. Lo and behold, a fucking spammer. I never even heard of them spamming the Talk sections before. A learning experience, to be sure.

I agree with BicycleRepairMan, looking at political stances and such he is no different then Hillary. Sure his character might be better, and its wonderful to see someone being able to speak coherently again after so many years of NUCULAR. I wonder how the GOP is reloading it's slime guns, am waiting to hear all about him being a terrorist, a muslim, with middle name of Hussein. Fox News will be going beserk if he gets the nomination.

Though I think its all a facade, I don't think he will change so much. He pulls alot of string with his hope and change rehetoric, but doesn't really say all that much of substance, its classic JFK in that sense, that why he can't be caught not acutally doing anything, unlike Bush who promised the world democracy and a trip to Mars.

Will Obama unravel all those years of consolidating executive power? Reform DOJ? Reform OLC? Come out against US torture programs? increase taxes? rebuild the import based economy? End the war with dignity? Wane off oil?

Though one bright side is that speeches by him internationally would be something to really witness, I can totally see him pulling a "Ich bin Berliner" somewhere... "Ana Arabia" would be awesome to ease Middle East tensions.

But then again part of me thinks there is a white neo-Nazi loading a sniper rifle right now somewhere out there.

hehehe one upvote for the clip and another one for the "nucular" comment ;-)

you spelled nucular wrong in the tags