Here's a translation from here. It's actually for the lo
nger news video which is this video with a few extra minutes.

N - newscaster
T - teacher
P - police officer

The scene opens up, with the teacher's hand on the cop's torso.

T: Why do you want to put your hands on me?
P: I don't want to ma'am. (unsure of this) What have I done to you? [he walks out of the doorway to get some distance, not taking his eyes off her]
T: You put your hands on me a few times
P: Don't pull me. Be careful... [as they walk out and, I'm assuming she pulls his jacket/arm (view is blocked by his torso). He deflects her arm by grabbing it and pushing it to the left.]
T: [with her now free arm, she backhands the cop and says] Get the hell out of here or I'll slap the shit out of you! (Note: she doesn't curse, but that's about the closest translation I can come up with that conveys in English the true sentiment behind the words. The literal translation is "Go away from here because I will give you such a slap that you will not see yourself." See, it's just not the same Smile)
P: Ioooooooi. (A Romanian exclamation that conveys, in this case, "Oh no she didn't!") [Cop puts his glasses on. Queue Won't Get Fooled Again by The Who.]
T: Why are you putting your hands on me repeatedly? Why? (Or "a hundred times" to quote her exactly") [Teacher stands her ground, looking furious and aggrieved.]
P: [slaps the teacher]
T: [gasps! Puts her hand on her face, looking shocked. Starts a fake (at least to me it sounds fake) cry.]
T: [walks away crying, raises her arm slightly]
P: [flinches at the threat of another possible slap. Grabs the teacher's arm.]
T: [wails something intelligibly, possibly about gypsies]
[old batiked woman woman opens door of another classroom and says something about this having to stop]

N: The protagonists of this fight are a teacher and a police officer, and the scene is the school in Sanpaul from the county Mures. The two representatives of the state institutions started quarreling and exchanging slaps in front of cameras and in a place with children. (Oh noes, think of the children!!) The police officer had been called to settle a conflict in which the teacher was implicated, after several parents [cue scene of angry-looking parents in a wintry scene] from the town of Sanpaul had accused the teacher of being aggressive towards the other teaching staff. The angered professor also lunged at the reporter from Antena 3 (the channel broadcasting this). [Cue scene with teacher pushing jacketed and scarfed man]

Reporter: We have it on camera.
T: Good. (something intelligible) [Angrily] So I'll push you as he's pushing me!!

N: The parents of some children are unhappy that the teacher is violent in school.

[cue angry parents shouting angrily, not at aaaaaall angry like the teacher]

Woman in white, shouting: What kind of example is this for children, tell me!

[cut to head of police in the area]

Head: Madam teacher was here at the police precinct. She said that she was slapped by another teacher. She will go to the forensic expert and she will file a complaint.

N: The teacher is defending herself and maintains that she is the one who is being aggressed by her colleagues.

T: [very serene and nonchalant] It was about discrimination. I'm very sorry for the incident, but I didn't aggress any teacher. Everything was planned. (As in, this was done to make her look bad.)

N: The Education Minister has started an administrative inquisition in the case of the teacher, and sanctions can be as grave as excluding her from teaching. And as far as the police man who slapped her is concerned, authorities have declined to respond.


There's no question she's nuts. Whether the cop should've done what he is is the only debatable point, though he did stun her enough to get her to stop her crap without any kind of tasering or true physical force. In another vid, she gets called up by a TV show for an interview and basically denies hitting anyone even though it was caught on camera, and then starts yelling at the host for not letting her talk. That vid is here, but nothing to see since it's just a video of a phone call. Translation for it is a good read though, which is here.

I think Madame Curie would disagree with Mr Vonnegut, and since she is a radioactive zombie and he is just a regular zombie I think she might just win that argument.

Why no asterix?......Scaredycat.

In reply to this comment by EndAll:
>> ^Ornthoron:
I do not appreciate your trolling behaviour.
ban


Really? For this?

>> ^skullfuckjr:
Well, that's an awful nice skull you got there, Sir or Madam.
/thrust thrust


?

So, the Republicans, Fox News, and conservatives, are allowed to act mean, and draconian, without an ounce of responisbility for their actions. Well saw just over the summer, how responsible they are with power, with all the town meeting 'shocking matchs'. In addition, the small buzz words like 'Death Panel' and 'Socialized Heathcare'. Mr. Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, O'Reilly, Miss Coulter, ARE, the representatives of the Republican party. While Mr. Obama, Reid, Madam Pelosi, and Ted Kennedy (May he rest in peace!), are (or were) representatives of the Democratic party.

Which of those two groups, can be held FULLY accountable for what they say and do in our country?

I dont think the word 'Bully', correctly the actions and words of the representatives of the Republicans are doing (and there mini---er---coworkers). Being an Oppressor? Tormentor? Intimidator? They are NOT, the sort of words you want your philosophy or concept of goverment to be thought of as. Heck, when looking up the other synonym's of the word 'Bully', is 'Terrorist', 'tyrant', 'ruffian', and 'buffalo'! (buffalo?)

As with Mr. Grayson, its custum to wear the tie, UNDER, the sweater, when a sweater is worn, with a jacket. Wearing without a tie, would have word just the same. Its a custom irregularity that we Americans might seem alittle strange.

>> ^Ornthoron:
I do not appreciate your trolling behaviour.
ban


Really? For this?

>> ^skullfuckjr:
Well, that's an awful nice skull you got there, Sir or Madam.
/thrust thrust


?

now sir, or madam... im startin to like the cut of your jibe.

In reply to this comment by radx:
Me likey ... *promote

>> ^demon_ix:
Wow. The point flew right past you, didn't it?


No, it shows what you can do with legos, stop motion techniques and 1500 hours of time. I like stop motion, from feature films like Coraline to shorts like Madame Tutli-Putli. They require insane patience, dedication and skill to pull off, and create the kinds of surreal gorgeous visuals that CG simply cannot match.

This video demonstrates that the creators do indeed have the skill and dedication to pull off great stop motion art. However, the simple geometry and texture of lego blocks is something easily replicated by CG. The creators did not take advantage of the uniqueness of stop-motion video, except in the beginning where the lego interacts with the humans. So in the end this is merely an impressive (but unnecessary) exercise in stop motion techniques.

So, yes, I do consider this to be a colossal waste of time because they could have better showcased and taken advantage of the uniqueness of stop-motion animation, instead of creating a series of effects that can be easily duplicated for a fraction of the time and effort spent. To put things into perspective, 1500 hrs is about 4 years at 1 hours a day, or ~3 months (waking hours). With that time, they could have learned an instrument, wrote a book, took a semester of college, worked out and become very fit, done some humanitarian work in Africa, etc. But hey, at least they managed to impress some people like you and reach #1 on videosift. Well done.

HAHAHAHAH! (This is the entire conversation)

Stranger: finland
You: That country the rest of the world hates
Your conversational partner has disconnected.


Stranger: hello
You: Hello
Stranger: ni shi na li ren
You: Uh, ok.
Stranger: 听的懂不. 外国狗
You: I'm not sure why you'd start in English then move to anything else.
Stranger: fuck you very very much
You: Why thank you!
You: Fuck you as well, good sir/madam!
Your conversational partner has disconnected.

Man if only she got elected, there would be a lot less countries in the world.

"Hello, Madam President. How is your husband?"

**NUKE**

I am outright shocked to see that, while marginally moving towards a more moderate position on other topics, apparently thepinky hasn't learned a single thing from the 'discussion' she 'started' almost a year ago.

Madame, I'll repeat bits of what was said in what I honestly think is the best comment regarding pornography that I've ever read online and say that it is completely and unequivocally apparent that you've been misled by the people that assigned pornography the role of the culprit in the unfortunate experiences that you've been subjected to. This was pointed out to you by many, using a variety of arguments. How you've managed to ignore all of that is beyond me.

P.S. And apparently she's still quite the troll.

>> ^thepinky:
I started writing a response, but then I realized that it isn't worth my time to try and explain why your porn vs. pizza comparison is bogus.

In reply to this comment by inflatablevagina:
Thank you!!! It's probably mostly in part to your votes!

In reply to this comment by enoch:
WOOT! WTG!!
HI-HO SILVER!!!!
surely madam,
i have no idea of which you speak *cough*
/walks away innocently

Oooo and it's sifted! You may now kiss my feet, starting with the pinky toe and working your way inwards. Slowly.

In reply to this comment by evil_disco_man:
Why thank you kindly, madam.

In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
*promote

Probably my favourite off this album

Why thank you kindly, madam.

In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
*promote

Probably my favourite off this album

wowowowwo his hypocrisy knows no end and my thoughts exactly

In reply to this comment by Duckman33:
Someone please tell me why this complete moron is still on the air or why anyone believes a single word he says. I can't believe he has the audacity to tell a lawyer of all people they are wrong about the law and he's right. This guy does not have the brains "God" gave a piss ant.

"I don't dish it out, madam I don't do that stuff. We don't do that here, ever" As he bullies the lawyer pointing his finger in her face. What a complete asshat.

Someone please tell me why this complete moron is still on the air or why anyone believes a single word he says. I can't believe he has the audacity to tell a lawyer of all people they are wrong about the law and he's right. This guy does not have the brains "God" gave a piss ant.

"I don't dish it out, madam I don't do that stuff. We don't do that here, ever" As he bullies the lawyer pointing his finger in her face. What a complete asshat.