http://www.businessinsider.com/two-guys-build-working-jetpack-using-real-jet-engines-2015-11

http://www.gizmag.com/jetpack-aviation-new-york-flight/40286/

How about -sometimes photons appear to have mass, sometimes they don't.

As for Neutrinos, apparently they also can't exceed the speed of light. The experiment that said they might was flawed.
http://www.gizmag.com/neutrinos-sub-light-speed/22876/

http://www.gizmag.com/3d-imaging-single-lens/28591/

Strange? problematic? Wasn't Jacques Cousteau using stuff like this: http://www.gizmag.com/go/7148/ back in the 1970s? Her arms work so she could use something like this quite effectively right?

WANT.

This was Gizmag's Loz Blain testing the bike for a review. Youtube link here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TxEw1LunfM which has a link to the article.

I still don't know where it was. It looks like Australia/NZ, but why is he talking mph and inches?

Now here is an interesting idea. This device is mounted to the handlebars of a bike and projects a bright green image onto the roadway in front of the bike. It's designed to warn autos of the oncoming bike.

http://www.gizmag.com/blaze-bicycle-laser-safety-device/18886/

Tags for this video have been changed from 'steve, durnin, gizmag, gear, Transmission' to 'steve durnin, gizmag, gear, Transmission, d drive' - edited by kronosposeidon

http://www.gizmag.com/d-drive-redux/15120/

^ they go through an engineering report on the device. key points being the "control" motor would have to be as powerful as the "drive" motor (in terms of torque), and control motor would also need it's own CVT, which introduces a friction component into the system.

very cool and interesting invention.
here's article that goes with that video http://www.gizmag.com/steve-durnin-ddrive-d-drive-infinitely-variable-transmission-geared/15088/

interesting, but i'm very skeptical of the timeframes given... not to mention the hypothetical building costs for this hypothetical commercial energy production

as an example of this, here's a recent time magazine article on the "comeback" of nuclear power plants:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1869203,00.html

just look at those cost overruns and timeframes for a *known* and now-politically acceptable method of energy production -- now we just need to get over our fears of safely transporting our nuclear waste by inter-state rail to the massive yucca mountain repository

all that aside, i really hope that we don't put all our eggs in one basket - there's certainly no dearth of promising energy alternatives

imho, this man is brilliant - please take the time to consider this testimonial

http://www.oceancommission.gov/meetings/may13_14_02/craven_testimony.pdf

for further consideration:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_thermal_energy_conversion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_power

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_power

http://www.evhotspot.com/ocean-current.html

http://www.gizmag.com/energy-island-otec/8714/

anyway, good sift... thanks