Well the Google gave me the full frontal nudity indeed... thta's why the first guy "fainted", he's seen her naked before...

>> ^acidSpine:

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
I think that's 'Kitten Natividad', a softcore porn actress from the 70's who was made famous by boob-obsessed film director, Russ Meyers.

Wait...so you're saying there's more footage of this woman...without her clothes on?...Nice

Tidbits from wikipedia:

* Leno faced controversy due to the frontal nudity he requested to be in the film.
* There was also word of a deep hatred between Morita and Leno, for Morita had once referred to Leno as a "fat slob" during the production of the movie.

I like overcast's descriptions:

- Graphic depictions of human masturbation are not allowed.
- Graphic depictions of human sexual intercourse are not allowed.
- Frontal nudity should be limited to comedic, artistic or educational context.

And I am fully on the side of the sift being very strict with this. Yes you can have nudity (National Geographic and educational videos etc.), you can even have sex (The internal view of people having sex comes to mind), but I think it should be a case of... put forward those guidelines, but also it has to come down to a personal decision in some cases, and it's your decision is final, and if you don't like it then go to youporn.

I have no issues with porn per se, I DO have huge issues with the trend of mainstream porn at the moment to degrade women to a huge degree and completely forget the erotic side of sex. So I am completely with you on that front Dag... and, as you say, there are plenty of places to find porn on the web if you want it, so why does it need to be here? I have this site open at work, and so would rather not have to explain some thumbnail on the front page if it's open when my boss comes around.

And trying to suggest that the video in question was ok because a) It wasn't degrading, and b) It was cut such that it was supposed to be funny is missing the point. This is not about whether or not we're prudish, it's merely drawing a line in the sand as to what should go on this site, and a video of women masturbating, and showing the full act, can clearly be blocked for stepping over that line.

dag, since this is really your rule and since what is and isn't porn varies from person to person, you're ultimately going to have to define this. Here's some suggested language, though.

- Graphic depictions of human masturbation are not allowed.
- Graphic depictions of human sexual intercourse are not allowed.
- Frontal nudity should be limited to comedic, artistic or educational context.

I'd avoid using the word "titillation" since we've got plenty of stuff that could be titillating but is clearly not porn.

Nobody wants to see your distended vagina, Mrs. Stone. Sorry.

>> ^blankfist:
I'll agree to be in it only if I can do one full frontal nudity scene.

I'll agree to be in it only if I can do one full frontal nudity scene.

And let it never be said that the Sift lacks for full frontal nudity. Oh man, now there's a playlist I don't want to create.

"Bart! Don't ask stupid questions. Will there be any full frontal nudity?"

I'm all for T&A, nudity, lesbians making out, and porn (Woo Hoo!) However, I stood up because I'm noticing that the content on VS is pushing the boundries every day, and while we can down vote all day long, most people will upvote T&A, Nudity, lesbians making out and Porn... why? Because SEX SELLS. Its been with us since the dawn of time and will continue to be with us. Few people object anymore and I was surprised no one (see comment section) objected to the original video that showed frontal nudity, which supports my point. My Wild Things video was to prove a point and ask the question: ok where does VS draw the line? I guess now we know a little better. I hated to have to speak up but I shouldn't have to (especially since I'm all for it - BUT NOT HERE). I guess I care too much about VS to see it become just another regular site.

Siftquistion!!! VIVA LA RESISTANCE!

LOL! :-P ~