This video has been declared a duplicate by the original submitter; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by bleedmegood.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Death-Metal-Grandma-and-Grandpa

http://videosift.com/video/Death-Metal-Grandma-and-Grandpa

Why is Cookie Monster singing death metal?

Wait, so per the drawing bigfoot is a 10' tall, death metal playing wizard with six fingers on each hand.

...oh, and beautiful hair.

I never really heard the differences until just now. And, apparently, I prefer Death Metal, with Progressive Metal coming in a very close second.

Bugging you again.

Told C that I wanted to date other people.
Considering all alternatives, it went well.
It wasn't something that I wanted to tell her.
It was something that I had to tell her.

In retrospect, I think it went about as well as thing like that could go. We held hands. Kissed. Pressed our old middle-aged heads together. Smelled her hair. It soothed me.

We went out to the parking lot to neck, and some guy—some asshole came out and started filming us. We had to laugh. As if that sorry son of a bitch didn't have something better to do.

At, what? Two in the morning?

I flashed him my titties as we drove off. That'll show him!

Two can play at that game, but I probably won't, because anybody lame enough to film to old farts necking in an empty down-town parking lot isn't going to expose himself to anything more radical than...what...over-caffination?

A pair of cargo shorts that mis-match his death-metal tee-shirt?

Thinking of you, my long away Austin (but not Austin) firecracker.



In reply to this comment by peggedbea:
i take in strays. i sing songs. i go to baseball games. i have a sore rotator cuff.

>> ^geo321:

I think death metaling old songs is booming into a bull blown trend.


And me lohvez it :-)

I think death metaling old songs is booming into a bull blown trend.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'louis armstrong, death metal, wonderful world' to 'louis armstrong, death metal, wonderful world, cookie monster' - edited by therealblankman

>> ^gwiz665:
Lols. If only Louie could see it himself.


He wouldna get it whiz....

Mr. Sensitive? LOL! Look in the mirror. Besides it doesn't matter, the point(s) is/are moot. The powers that be have spoken. And it was correctly duped. I hope that helps as well.

In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
The hobbling thing was a joke, Mr. sensitive. You can't hobble with invocations anyway. Did you not know that?

Your dictionary definition isn't very good. By this definition, most music videos would be considered background music.

Background/foreground music has less to do with screens and observable sources and more to do with focus, hence the 'back' in background.
Here are some examples that should help you better understand the distinction.

Background music would be:
-Music under dialogue in a film
-Music accompanying a slide show of family photos
-Music during a wedding procession
-Anything where music plays a supporting role rather than being the focus of attention

Foreground music would be:
-Music from a concert (live or recorded)
-Music from a music video
-Music from mashups featuring chickens singing with hardcore metal bands.
-Anything where the music is the focal point.

I hope this helps.

In reply to this comment by Duckman33:
Background music is background music. It was the same exact video with different background music.... So now you're going to hobble me out of spite? Real mature.. FYI here's what the dictionary considers background music: "Music accompanying action on the screen, but coming from no discernible source within the film." It seems their definition and mine are one in the same. A mashup does not fit into this definition.

Mashups are not a video of a rooster crowing with a death metal soundtrack slapped in the background. As you know, the music is taken from an actual song from an actual artist and mixed the with vocs from another actual song from another actual artist and then slapped on one of the two artists music videos. Just a tad bit different there.

In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
I don't think 'background music' means what you think it means. The music in the video I submitted was not accompaniment, it was the foreground. If your interpretation of 'background music' were correct, then half the mashups on this site would be considered dupes. *hobble

In reply to this comment by Duckman33:
In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
Duckman, you incorrectly duped one of my vids. Try and be a bit more careful in the future or I'm going to hobble your waterproof ass.

Hmm, which one? Ive been pretty careful about duping... N/M I found it, and it was correctly duped. From the FAQ: "Minor changes in content, like a few additional insignificant seconds of video or alternate background music, will still be considered dupes."

The hobbling thing was a joke, Mr. sensitive. You can't hobble with invocations anyway. Did you not know that?

Your dictionary definition isn't very good. By this definition, most music videos would be considered background music.

Background/foreground music has less to do with screens and observable sources and more to do with focus, hence the 'back' in background.
Here are some examples that should help you better understand the distinction.

Background music would be:
-Music under dialogue in a film
-Music accompanying a slide show of family photos
-Music during a wedding procession
-Anything where music plays a supporting role rather than being the focus of attention

Foreground music would be:
-Music from a concert (live or recorded)
-Music from a music video
-Music from mashups featuring chickens singing with hardcore metal bands.
-Anything where the music is the focal point.

I hope this helps.

In reply to this comment by Duckman33:
Background music is background music. It was the same exact video with different background music.... So now you're going to hobble me out of spite? Real mature.. FYI here's what the dictionary considers background music: "Music accompanying action on the screen, but coming from no discernible source within the film." It seems their definition and mine are one in the same. A mashup does not fit into this definition.

Mashups are not a video of a rooster crowing with a death metal soundtrack slapped in the background. As you know, the music is taken from an actual song from an actual artist and mixed the with vocs from another actual song from another actual artist and then slapped on one of the two artists music videos. Just a tad bit different there.

In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
I don't think 'background music' means what you think it means. The music in the video I submitted was not accompaniment, it was the foreground. If your interpretation of 'background music' were correct, then half the mashups on this site would be considered dupes. *hobble

In reply to this comment by Duckman33:
In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
Duckman, you incorrectly duped one of my vids. Try and be a bit more careful in the future or I'm going to hobble your waterproof ass.

Hmm, which one? Ive been pretty careful about duping... N/M I found it, and it was correctly duped. From the FAQ: "Minor changes in content, like a few additional insignificant seconds of video or alternate background music, will still be considered dupes."

Background music is background music. It was the same exact video with different background music.... So now you're going to hobble me out of spite? Real mature.. FYI here's what the dictionary considers background music: "Music accompanying action on the screen, but coming from no discernible source within the film." It seems their definition and mine are one in the same. A mashup does not fit into this definition.

Mashups are not a video of a rooster crowing with a death metal soundtrack slapped in the background. As you know, the music is taken from an actual song from an actual artist and mixed the with vocs from another actual song from another actual artist and then slapped on one of the two artists music videos. Just a tad bit different there.

In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
I don't think 'background music' means what you think it means. The music in the video I submitted was not accompaniment, it was the foreground. If your interpretation of 'background music' were correct, then half the mashups on this site would be considered dupes. *hobble

In reply to this comment by Duckman33:
In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday:
Duckman, you incorrectly duped one of my vids. Try and be a bit more careful in the future or I'm going to hobble your waterproof ass.

Hmm, which one? Ive been pretty careful about duping... N/M I found it, and it was correctly duped. From the FAQ: "Minor changes in content, like a few additional insignificant seconds of video or alternate background music, will still be considered dupes."

what ...the....FUCK did i just watch?
this video had me mouthing off like don rickles on a crystal meth bender but i'll curb my urge to eviscerate this....*cough*.....music?
talent aside...and lets be up front..these guys have some talent but the whole "arpeggio/melodic/overload with lyrical operatic overtones" was already done by jason becker and marty friedman in the 80's.if you like these guys you will most likely enjoy CACOPHONY.
i'll upvote on the bizzar factor but not on content.this song is...yeesh.../cringes.
meh../shrugs..maybe its just me but it seems they should be played at 33 RPM's and not 44 RPM's.
and i am by no means a purists,my music tastes are extremely eclectic but i'll listen to death metal before being subjected to this.
sorry guitarwolf but i cant join ya in appreciating this band.
seems you really like them.