Your video, bouncy breasts to mozart, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Increase breast size! Zoom away from the unsightly wrinkles! Enchance!

I don't know anything about this issue apart from what is stated in this video and what you just said. I guess I could do my own study, but I think it would come across as strange or creepy if I approached random women with big and small breasts on the street, asking them if they like their breasts being touched and writing down the results.
Everybody seems to have a different opinion on this, so I guess I'll never know.

Go talk to women with larger breasts and ones with smaller. Do your own study. Their "sexual sensitivity," as in their stimulation for pleasure is much less. That has been my personal experience. Women with breasts C cup and under like fondling and breast play more.

As he said, studies have shown that bigger breasts are less sensitive, but this only makes a difference if you try to feel "hair-like filaments". If you're not trying to feel a single hair on your breasts, it seems to make no difference.

I'm with blue. It's been an assumed 6 inches forever but there's been studies out since the 90s that the avg is only 5.5 and then they even broke it down by race with american indians being the largest avg at 5.7. Same thing with condom sensitivity. They actually make condoms now that make it less sensitive for men who go...faster. Bigger breasts ARE less sensitive. The latest being a study done in Vienna where larger breasts were approximately 25% less sensitive because breast have more fatty tissue than glandular tissue which is more sensitive.
I want to see this guy's sources. He has a lot of good facts but a lot of bad ones as well.

A. the average penis size is 6" ever since ever. Where did they get 7? hair? condoms? Oh man... Bigger breasts have ALWAYS been considered MORE sensitive because the nerves are closer to the surface... men do peak earlier - young guys do come earlier....just gave up after.

Circumcision of a person without consent and without immediate medical reason should be made illegal. It's unbelievable in this day and age that it occurs and is seemed as normal, and yet people scream foul play over female circumcision.

Barbaric practice, needs to go. We don't accept unnecessary female circumcision, there is no reason to accept male. It offers significant drawbacks and no benefits to a healthy baby born into a western civilised country.

If you're likely to live and have sex with members of a population in which HIV is rife, i could see it being used to save a couple of lives out of every few hundred thousand. However if you live in a country where HIV is uncommon, circumcision is not any kind of protection - the child is not going to grow up using circumcision as a defence against STDs especially when trivial solutions exist that provide 99.999% protection. So you've taken away a wealth of nerve endings in the skin and furthermore deadened the sensitivity of the tip by exposing it to 'rough' surfaces, but there's no benefit.

That "prevention" method (above) only works in the same way as pre-emptive breast removal works. You'd only recommend it to those massively at risk.

Barbaric definitely is the word. And archaic. And the words "improper use of statistics and research to come to a poor conclusion". A bit like the fallacy of autism/immunisation that people bang on about to this very day despite it being bollocks of the highest order. Christ, even if it were true (which it categorically isn't), i'd rather my kid have ASD than die from polio or any of the other countless diseases that literally killed millions before being eradicated through immunisation.

Nobody is asking you to fondle their breasts, real or not. When I last checked it was not a prerequisite to treating somebody with basic respect.

Nipplegate 2004.

As American boys were creating 4.5 million orphans in a foreign war fought on a pretext shown to be a lie, American mothers lost their minds when Justin Timberlake exposed Janet Jackson's breast for half a second during the Superbowl halftime.

The FCC received 511 complaints in 2001. In 2004, nearly 1.5 million complaints triggered by Nipplegate forced the FCC to bring the all-powerful broadcasting industry to heel, handing out record fines and ensuring ongoing censorship of 'offensive material' that continues today.

The National Coalition on Television Violence estimates that an American child will witness 8,000 murders and 100,000 acts of violence on television by the time they finish elementary school. But an exposed female nipple...

"It's just not safe for children anymore."

If this IS real, I'm happy for the voyeuristic privilege -- but, damn, don't spoil the girl's fun!

Probably fake though.

Also, I may have to watch this every day or try my darndest to recreate the scenario. Wow. I just never considered this...

+50 to breast milk fetish!! Time to revisit the good ol Takashi Miike breast milk scenes.

Your video, Louis CK - Breasts and Grapes of Wrath, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Damn it Cenk, you have to touch nipples to activate your breast twin powers, we know it, you know it. Stop being such a disingenuous homosexual sympathizer.

I was walking through town the other day, and a generously proportioned lady was walking toward me with "BREASTS!" written across her tshirt.

I silently applauded her for her honesty.

You say you aren't looking at them sexually yet you follow it up with how seductive they are?

Point is, which you seem to purposely overlook, is that staring is a LOT different than observing. Checking someone out is fine and dandy. Staring, obnoxiously, at a women's breasts because it sexually excites you as she's breastfeeding is just plain juvenile.

So again, if you think they should be okay with you staring at their body, why aren't you letting yours hang all out for them?