I'm impressed they didn't try to take the camera or some such foolishness. They really just have to say they have a warrant? Don't have to tell you what it's for? Sounds like bovine feces...but I don't know the law.

Ahh, throwing the "there's so much to understand/interpret in god's work, non-believers will never understand it" card again.

Bovine manure. There's nothing to understand, there's only stuff to "interpret" whichever way suits you and calling it "enhanced understanding". The Bible is exactly equally as ridiculous as Ron Hubbard's nonsense; lord xenu's DC-7 spaceships are equally as ludicrous as a man surviving inside of a whale for several weeks. Only difference is the bible's more obscure, so that if a new bunch of people appear wanting to justify their new ideas/lifestyle, they can always "interpret" some parts/passages in one of the most ambiguous books ever written to their benefit.

Am I the only one who found this whole bullshit to be unbelievably fucking lame, hackneyed, and representative of the bovine nature of your typical TV enthusiast? Talk about killing the joke... a joke that was never more than smirk-worthy in the first place. This whole thing is like those terrible parts of Whose Line is it Anyways (my most-hated show of all time) where Wayne Brady does the "sing like an overly effusive white guy" bit and I go lunging for the remote control.

>> ^StukaFox:
Welcome to ALL your food if the Republicans had their way with the FDA. Remember: Industry is the best police of industry!


Although I'm Libertarian and support a modest FDA, arguing about their role right now is like complaining about a leaky roof during a flood. So with that out of the way, I'll point out that the consumer's best friend is always going to be a solid court system. Even the most staunch capitalists aren't in favor of anarchy, protecting rights, upholding contracts, and offering recourse is essential, and I'm not sure China has that. Just recently, some guy here sold peanuts he knew were contaminated, and the socialists came out of the woodwork to claim that this is what capitalists are incentivized to do, make profits. Meanwhile, the company is about to be sued into oblivion, it has already filed for bankruptcy. If he was a good capitalist, he would have done what was profitable, and selling poisoned peanuts was the least profitable decision he could have made under this system. No system, it turns out, can prevent people from being idiots.

Still, the socialists argue that there is a way to protect everyone from idiots: by charging each family $1,000 a day to appoint one government inspector per peanut, and then $1,000 more to hire watchdogs for those inspectors, and so forth. Similarly, a socialist would probably approve regulation that locked us all in our basements to reduce the murder and fraud rate to 0. That's just an extreme example of how socialists fundamentally cannot understand that saving a few human lives simply is not worth incurring a greater, but non-fatal aggregate cost. In this case: the freedom to interact with other human beings. In the food case, the cost of the food itself. How much money should we take from people to ensure the safety of their food.

I think my biggest criticism of the FDA is that any agency which purports to protect you with its powers is subject to corruption. The FDA colludes with businesses all the time to look the other way on things, sort of like how impotent the SEC became (and to what degree were people less skeptical thinking that they were protecting them?). They allow things that have been banned in other countries for years: water fluoridation, bovine growth hormones in milk, nitrates in meat.... they were paid off in the 80s by artificial sweetener interests (billion dollar industry) to ban stevia, a natural patent-less sugar substitute that is far safer. And maybe the most dangerous of all, they have the power to ban promising new drugs they deem "unsafe" or "experimintal." Doesn't matter if you're dying of cancer and have nothing to lose, they won't let you choose.

>> ^peggedbea:
the turning point came when i had to do a bladder study on 2 boys 2 weeks in a row, both were under 7, both had not been circumsized and both had chronic bladder and kidney infections. when i went to cath both of them their foreskins were filthy and crusted on, i dont think their parents have EVER pulled that stuff back and cleaned it properly.

WTF, are you an idiot? This only shows the mental damage American society (or whatever society you're in) has had from years of unwarranted circumcision : bad genital hygiene. The Chinese/Japanese/Indian/Latino-American/European are for the majority uncircumcised and lo, they wash their foreskin and don't get any more infections than the circumcised. And why would what other parents can't do influence your choice? Because they're so dumb they can't wash their child's foreskin you're going to lower yourself to their level and not wash your child's foreskin too? What if they jumped off a bridge, would you jump off too?

The generalized correct reasoning here is this: don't wash foreskin = infection. Wash foreskin = no infection. Everything else is pure bullshit (because as we all know bovine feces is sterile).

i interviewed all my male friends both circumsized and uncircumsized, and one friend that had not been circumsized as a baby, but chose to be later on in life, everyone says circumsicion. so we did it.

And so you're a hypocrite and a sheeple. Not surprising coming from an idiot. Ask a Sunni if Shiites are bad, of course he'll say yes. Ask an evangelical church-goer if atheists are bad, of course he'll say yes. It still doesn't mean their opinion has any value outside of their little micro-society.

he was 6 hours old, they numbed him and gave him a chocolate sucker to suck on. nowadays they circumsize babies by putting this plastic bell over their penis, it cuts off circulation to the foreskin and it falls off in about a week. we had no problems and he doesnt seem to miss it and i dont feel bad about it now.

Glad the experience didn't give you PTSD.

foreskins have been shown to carry disease and a contributing factor the aids epidemic in africa, but still as nature intended.

False, false, false, and you're an idiot. The "study" that "proved" a "link" between foreskin and AIDS was a "study" that looked at the prevalence of AIDS vs the prevalence of circumcision, and ONLY in some regions of South Africa. More that 30% of South Africans have HIV. Correlation is NOT causation, not even link. Do some statistics: you'll be scared by how easy it is to find correlations between non random normally distributed sets, which includes nearly everything that has to do with human life.

its also interesting since ive grown up in a culture of male circumsicion, im intimidated by foreskins and prefer that stuff cut off if im gonna have sex with it, all my female friends feel the same way.

Yes it's interesting, but not the way you think it is. It's interesting in the same way the neurotic women Freud psychoanalyzed were interesting : they were mentally ill.

how do the men feel about their foreskins, or lack there of?

Coming from a now mostly circumcision free society, we do not feel much of anything about our foreskins unless they give us trouble, like any other part of our body.

also, to this day the smell of chocolate dumdums reminds me of the day my son was born.

Proof of your neurosis? You tell me.

Finally, I think the Ancient Greeks had it right : a man is not naked until his foreskin is fully retracted. Maybe circumcision is why so many Americans are still so prudish regarding nudity?

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Bovine-body-builders

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by eric3579.

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Bovine-body-builders

Dupe: http://www.videosift.com/video/Bovine-body-builders

*discard

What kind of retarded reality show would even think about filming this twit? She probably should have been crushed to death for hiding behind a door being pressed on by almost a ton of bovine. Jesus, if someone was parking a car in a garage would you stand there as it inches closer to crushing you?

WTF? Just push the thing back. I really hope something bad happens to this inbred excuse for a darwin award.

I applaud it.
Its helping create feed that is perfectly designed for the cows, reduce their methane production, increase their food/energy conversion (less feed for the same effort), and other great benefits to both us as consumers of bovine products, and the cows themselves.

Looks gruesome, but it doesn't harm the cows.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'bovine, growth, hormone, igf1, serum, rbgh, rbst' to 'bovine, growth, hormone, igf1, serum, rbgh, rbst, monsanto' - edited by NetRunner

bovine perspiration on her upper lip area.

yeah, unfortunately it is a dupe, lots of them popping up now that search is down

holy sweet mother of murgatroyd!

the *science behind the bovine Mike Tyson, eh?

and that's without exercise, chemical enhancement, or direct genetic manipulation. just breeding. oy.