[BLACKWHITECupid.com is] widely considered to be the greatest singles club ever by millions of black white singles, about half of which have actually found matches from it.

[BLACKWHITECupid.com is] widely considered to be the greatest singles club ever by millions of black white singles, about half of which have actually found matches from it.

[BLACKWHITECupid.com is] widely considered to be the greatest singles club ever by millions of black white singles, about half of which have actually found matches from it.

[BLACKWHITECupid.com is] widely considered to be the greatest singles club ever by millions of black white singles, about half of which have actually found matches from it.

[BLACKWHITECupid.com is] widely considered to be the greatest singles club ever by millions of black white singles, about half of which have actually found matches from it.

[BLACKWHITECupid.com is] widely considered to be the greatest singles club ever by millions of black white singles, about half of which have actually found matches from it.

I love The World Cup! World Cup is about sportsmanship. My boyfriend and i both think so. He is a sexy black man,lol. I know him via *** (B lack wh ite Cupid)* .*{C00M} *** a nice place for black white singles, to interact with each other...no bounds or extremes in front of true love. . ...@love it

★★★★★★

I love The World Cup! World Cup is about sportsmanship. My boyfriend and i both think so. He is a sexy black man,lol. I know him via *** (B lack wh ite Cupid)* .*{C00M} *** a nice place for black white singles, to interact with each other...no bounds or extremes in front of true love. . ...@love it

★★★★★★

I love The World Cup! World Cup is about sportsmanship. My boyfriend and i both think so. He is a sexy black man,lol. I know him via *** (B lack wh ite Cupid)* .*{C00M} *** a nice place for black white singles, to interact with each other...no bounds or extremes in front of true love. . ...@love it

★★★★★★

Tags for this video have been changed from 'jack, ninja, black and white, fight, shinobi' to 'samurai jack, ninja, fight scene, black, white, shadow, light' - edited by kronosposeidon

>> ^volumptuous:

The US tried blankfists idea of of "private business" rights for 100 years and it failed horribly. It took the Civil Rights Act to correct how bloody wrong it turned out to be.

Did it fail horribly? Do you know how many black business owners lost their businesses when black/white integration began? The thing is, it worked on a private business level. There were black businesses and their were white businesses. Both had a niche and both made money. As f*cked up as it sounds, shit worked on those terms. I feel like the civil rights movement wasn't just about segregation, but about social awareness. I think democrat or libertarian could agree that the freedom to have your voice heard so that you may change things is a good thing

Your point is spurious, because when has society oppressed people who shop at night or people who fart? You want to speak in hypotheticals, but the issue at hand has very real ramifications, and has in fact been tried in our country.

Aside from stores, what about getting a loan for a business or house? What about shopping for a house? What about getting service at a hospital, or even getting an ambulance (most ambulances are run by private companies)? What if I'm out of gas and need to stop at a service station? Etc.

This issue is much more complex and far reaching than going into a 7-Eleven. People 40-50 years ago literally died to change this, and they weren't just thinking about going into the local 5 and Dime store.
>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

^Freedom isn't a right to enter any particular store front you want. For instance, stores close. Once closed, you can't enter them. This is discriminatory against people who like to shop at night. However it is the shop keepers prerogative to not be open during the night. Where is the government action protecting the rights of people whom want to exist at night? What do you have against people of the night? Why is the government not protecting them at all costs? In fact, they are both black, white, brown, and many other colors! You might say, but they represent only a minority of the population; but I say that is why they should be protected more than any other!
Moreover, I also think people who fart in public represent a clear and present danger to my right to no smell poo around town. It is my god given right not to smell farts, and I demand laws to protect against this odorous epidemic!

^Freedom isn't a right to enter any particular store front you want. For instance, stores close. Once closed, you can't enter them. This is discriminatory against people who like to shop at night. However it is the shop keepers prerogative to not be open during the night. Where is the government action protecting the rights of people whom want to exist at night? What do you have against people of the night? Why is the government not protecting them at all costs? In fact, they are both black, white, brown, and many other colors! You might say, but they represent only a minority of the population; but I say that is why they should be protected more than any other!

Moreover, I also think people who fart in public represent a clear and present danger to my right to no smell poo around town. It is my god given right not to smell farts, and I demand laws to protect against this odorous epidemic!

I find it difficult to disagree or agree with him, not on the historical context he gives which I don't know much about but on the principle. I would presume in the vast majority of regions in the US, institutional racism simply doesn't exist any more. Sure, there's the crackpot here and there who's openly racist, there's the few here and there that harbor racist thoughts but on the whole it's simply not there.


Study after study have proven this is not true, both in the private and public domains. I'm speaking about overt and institutional racism. Heck, they just codified a racial profiling and banned ethnic studies in Arizona.


I think the Civil Rights Act as it was, applying to both public and private entities served a purpose. It made people come together and realize that much of the animosity was more fear of the unknown and a lack of intercommunication between two cultures that had simply grown apart. Heck, there's a whole litany of (terrible) black/white buddy cop movies that symbolize bridging this gap.

In the South, there had always been interpersonal communications and relationships between individuals of different races. The problem was the discrimination,i.e., forced to give up your seat for whites, not being able to use the restroom in certain parts of the city, being banned from attending most Universities, etc.

So I don't think that it was really the legislation that changed the state of society but the effect that forcing two cultures to become accustomed to each other had on perceptions.

The civil rights act didn't just magically change the country when it was passed. It took years of enforcement and civil agitation to bring the spirit of the law into reality. The legislation was a crucial step, though.

As it is now, I think in the vast majority of regions he is right, businesses who if given the chance would exclude black people, would be shooting themselves in the foot.

May I assume you have the luxury of not having to take that risk?

Not to mention, ultimately given that most people today aren't racist, as a minority would you want to inadvertently end up working under someone who is racist?

In a world where one both has to eat, and is a minority, what is desired is not to change the hearts of the whole country, but to be hired. I think that a significant amount of people in the US are racist, you think they aren't, but ultimately, it all about ensuring behavior (e.g., hiring, service) fits the law, not someone's thoughts.

I find it difficult to disagree or agree with him, not on the historical context he gives which I don't know much about but on the principle. I would presume in the vast majority of regions in the US, institutional racism simply doesn't exist any more. Sure, there's the crackpot here and there who's openly racist, there's the few here and there that harbor racist thoughts but on the whole it's simply not there.

I think the Civil Rights Act as it was, applying to both public and private entities served a purpose. It made people come together and realize that much of the animosity was more fear of the unknown and a lack of intercommunication between two cultures that had simply grown apart. Heck, there's a whole litany of (terrible) black/white buddy cop movies that symbolize bridging this gap. So I don't think that it was really the legislation that changed the state of society but the effect that forcing two cultures to become accustomed to each other had on perceptions. As it is now, I think in the vast majority of regions he is right, businesses who if given the chance would exclude black people, would be shooting themselves in the foot. Not to mention, ultimately given that most people today aren't racist, as a minority would you want to inadvertently end up working under someone who is racist?

Much of the campaigning against gay rights tries to tap into this same fear and misunderstanding. Think of that vague 'a storm is gathering' ad campaign, or the notion that legalising gay marriage will encourage homosexuality or even lead directly to bestiality or polygamy: fear mongering or patently ridiculous for anyone grounded in reality but potentially highly plausible for someone who has grown up in a very religiously fundamentalist region.