That Annie bit was about the only thing funny about the entire episode.

>> ^criticalthud:

>> ^westy:
>> ^criticalthud:
people.
Seismic activity has increased along with global warming.
Logic, physics, and probability all say that when you shift the mass of the earth (ice caps melting), seismic activity will increase. And it has, by a lot...in the last 30 years.
The poles are shifting.
This is the earth adjusting.
This is akin to shifting the mass of a spinning toy top.
It doesn't matter what you believe. You can believe in an invisible god-man in the sky too. This is about physics and reality. and it is going to get worse.

What you are saying might be true , but u have presented it in the most retarded way.
Also Evan though global warming is happening and ice caps are melting that does not necessarily mean there is causal link with seismic activity of curse there might be but its the kind of claim where u need to back it up with some evidence and sources.
"It doesn't matter what you believe. You can believe in an invisible god-man in the sky too. This is about physics and reality" ~ I think I get what you are trying to say with this but your communicating it all wrong, A christain could say exactly the same thing but focused on how god is real. Making a statment like that is uselss its the evidence and scientific method behind what is sead that will sway any sain person to believe in something or believing in something that is inline with reality.
Lol i Myself have not very clearly exsplaind why what u have said is retarded but im sure if you think about it you will see why what u said was not exactly cunstructive evan though im pritty sure u r on the right page with things.

Science, especially theoretical science is based on probability. Probability is a a process comprised mainly of inductive reasoning. k? this is looking at trends and connecting the dots. Physics...and simple probability. There are no definitives, no absolutes. It is virtually impossible to create a hard science in this realm...we simply don't have the tools.
Einstein's theories were still "theories", and have been proven throughout time (mainly in the mathematical realm). But they were theories based on probability. Asking "what if" and looking at liklihoods.
Our beliefs, or our hopes for absolutes do nothing to affect probability. And scientific "proof" is often for sale.
thanks for the opportunity to clarify.


"Science, especially theoretical science is based on probability. Probability is a a process comprised mainly of inductive reasoning. k? this is looking at trends and connecting the dots. Physics...and simple probability. There are no definitives, no absolutes. It is virtually impossible to create a hard science in this realm...we simply don't have the tools."

Although yes on a quantum level things are bassed on probability and ultimetly u can keep asking why unttill nothing makes anny sense , Its a fact that on our scale of interaction with the world things can be prodicted and understood to a level that alows for us to utilise scence and prodict and understand things to a high level.

I dont evan understand the overall point you are making you are contradicting yourself and going all over the place .

Instead of spewing all this talk out next time you want to make an objective claim why dont you just stick to stating the claim and then backing it up with evidence ?

You saying "It doesn't matter what you believe. You can believe in an invisible god-man in the sky too. This is about physics and reality. and it is going to get worse." does nothing to help anyone you simply cannot make a claim and then say LOGIC AND REASON GO TO SHOW I AM RIGHT.

lol what u put is like me saying , "LOgic and resoin go to show that the sun is smaller than a bannana you can belive in an invisable sky god-man . this is about phiusics and reality and its only gona get more bananery."

My obsession of Zach is limitless... I love his Annie routine, the pink knickers suit him!

*quality

"Our aim is to make abortion rare "

put money into and suport sex education froma yuong age , and hand out free contraception and gude women and men to clinics that can help them get the pill or other contaception then.

ohhhhh , he realy means our aim is to be fucking retarded morons and pick and choose at an old book geting everyone to belive it at anny cost ignoring whats been scentificaly proven to work best and be helpfull to people.

>> ^ghark:

You guys bitching about tennis fail to comprehend why we watch sport in the first place - because we are rooting for one of the teams or individuals. Watching any sport that you have no idea about is a bit bland because you don't have a team you are going for, you don't understand the rules, etc. So you're criticisms of tennis as a sport simply underline your ignorance of the game and it's players.
In the end it mostly comes down to what you got introduced to as a kid, you guys that are fans of NFL, baseball etc probably enjoy it because your dad cracked open a beer on Saturdays and let you watch the game with him, so you have strong memories of the game from a young age, you know how it works, and you have some knowledge of the players - that's about it really. If your dad introduced you to goat racing when you were 5 you'd be just as hot about that.
/rant off


I will adress your pionts one by one

"You guys bitching about tennis fail to comprehend why we watch sport in the first place - because we are rooting for one of the teams or individuals"

Rooting for one of the teams or individuals is just one aspect of sport and if you are watching a sport only for this then the sport could be anything might as well just bet on coin tosses.

"Watching any sport that you have no idea about is a bit bland because you don't have a team you are going for, you don't understand the rules, etc. So you're criticisms of tennis as a sport simply underline your ignorance of the game and it's players."

Although it might be the case that with Manny sports not knowing anything about a sport or the basic rules will make it bland for the general observer , I'm sure Manny people know the rules have played and follow sports and still can say why X sport is more bland or a worse spectator sport than another.

I know allot about tennis have watched allot of matches Your average tennis match i think can objectivly be described as predictable and bland , the same goes for most of the modern sports that are popular.


"In the end it mostly comes down to what you got introduced to as a kid,"


Again this can also be true but anny thinking person who looks for new exsperances will not simply go for things they are culturally indoctranted with.

you can also really enjoy all the external aspects of a sport the family gatherings and social aspects but then you are enjoying all the exsternal factors and not the macro aspects of the sport.

Tennis is actually a good example for this Its easy to follow interms of play x is winning will he wont he get the piont and you have tention derived from match pionts and what have you , However this same tention could be derived from a computer simulated match , and most matches play out in exactly the same way due to the lack of room for players to be creative and put an origonal stamp on play. ( this is a problem with Manny mainsteem sports It seems that people are more concernd with the ablity to follow the score and supporting a team or player and how clear that is over the macro elements of the game.

Now Granted there have been some tennis players that have played creatively but tennis produces very few of these players and evan these players often have bland matches. looking at other sports like English football you have countless players that play in a demonstrably different way to an existent where Evan a casual observer would notice. zeedane for example , or in f1 Michal Schumacher , personally i still think English football and F1 are still mindnumbingly bland for the most part but at least in something like f1 you have compleaty unexspected things happaning quite regulary ( cars blowing up people getting run over as well as pure racing thats uneequ )


Almost rant off ...

I still say you can objectively say x sport is a worse spectator sport than Y , and i would say that Tennis for the resion of lack of creativity afforded to its players makes a pore spectator sport.

I all-so apreceat that people have largely irrational motivations for why they like x sport over y nothing wrong with people enjoying stupid shit i enjoy stupid shit on a daily basis.

one thing that baffels me is the amount of people that turn out and watch these sports when we have the technology and ablity to have people competing them selfs and getting the benefit of not only seeing who will win but fitness and direct social interaction. if im to watch other humans partcing in an activty it has to be something Incredible that my mind cannot conseve of and that i cannot simply watch on a video.

he is making an argument from ignorance and then he thinking of the universe as if it has a predefined pattern.


because we were born into the system ( which we could only be born into if it happend to end up how it is ) it can feal like it was amazing odds for all those events to take place for us to then happen but if it haddent hae happend we wudnot exist to say that.


, if i was to say mix up all this matter and energy in the universe and end up with earth exactly as it is orbating the sun in the sweet spot for enoughf time for life to happen. the odds are stupidly small in fact it would probably never happen again.

but if i was to say mix up all the matter and energy in the universe and lets just have any plannets that happen to be in orbit in a sweet spot around anny sun be reported , you would have hundreds of billoins of planets there all with the potentail for life.

>> ^westy:

Why is there a "male" and "femail" catagory for something like this .
if your going to do that should have a disabled , black , chnise , jewish , 1 leg catagory as well


Because if they(women) want to be #1 in something, they need their own category for it because men are better at almost anything they put themselves in to. I'm not being chauvinistic, it's just the way things are.

It wasn't around at the time, but it's up now.

In reply to this comment by schmawy:
I assume you looked for it and couldn't find it because otherwise you surely would have tried to Sift it, Dr. Baber! You might rid yourself of the scarlet "P". You can expect some *promotes from me.

In reply to this comment by jbaber:
His cover of Annie's song really rips the heart out of it.

Wow - I took a full minute and 40 seconds for someone to tell Annie Oakley with the AR15 that he wasn't leading it enough? Fuuuuuck.

And a Merry Christmas to you as well! Cheers!

In reply to this comment by robbersdog49:
That was brilliant. I loved the imagery and style of the video and the music.

A nice start to my Christmas day! Happy Christmas Fusionaut

Tags for this video have been changed from 'annie, lennox, god, rest, ye, merry, gentlemen' to 'annie, lennox, god, rest, ye, merry, gentlemen, christmas' - edited by calvados

>> ^KnivesOut:

In other news, YET ANOTHER anonymous internet dbag has explained in great detail why he can't be bothered to give a shit.>> ^westy:
not really that cute skipped all the music , because I cannot give a shit about yet another person playing an old song in video format , if however sum-one was playing this in the room with me then id listen , or it was sumone doing something more original with the song in a video then that would be fine evan if it was played technically worse.



What i said is entrly logical , how is it entertaining watching sumone do the same task that i have seen hundreds of times before ? I made it clear that If this was in real life id sit and listen as that would provide a unequ exsperance ( dont know manny people who play peano) as apossed to online where i can load up amazing tellent in a few clicks. and I dont find the girl in the video cute.

Sure I love watching sumone build microchips or perform a task in a factory a cuple of times and learn a process thats as intresting as annything else , but after knowing the process and seeing it hundreds of times its no longer intresting. ( the way this person is playing to me comes across as very procedural , its not bad but it suports my piont that if i want to listen to simply well performed peano online why would i spend time watching this girl when i could watch other people that play in my opinoin far better.

Rather than just name calling maby you can actualy exsplain why i'm a "dbag" , from usage of the word "dbag" randomly calling sumone that without anny justification and no real backing, in a way to make oneself feal slighty better or to come across as better to ones peers is far more "dbagish" of a comment than what i Put.

>> ^mtadd:

I initially started watching because of the cute factor, but quickly became annoyed at her self-aggrandizement with respect to computer literacy. On a scale of 0=10, a 6 or 7 should know how to properly configure a home network.


lol on her scale she is probably a 2-3 , I would put sum-one like john car-mac at 9-10

A person that can build pc's designs software or can code to a basic level is probably around a 5-6 once you get to that level you can pritty much work you way out of anny computer issue it would just be a case of time and researching it but you would have all the understanding neaded.

anything after 6 would be where I would put people that work in research or engine programming , maby guys that design cpu arcutecture.

Charles Babbage needs to slap this girl.

I watched this for a while because she is quite attractive and the video seemed it might have some potential to go some where and maby be amusing in content. but the more I listen to her the more annoying she became.

If this was an ugly guy presenting the video It would not annoy me so much if just close the video and forget about it , but what annoys me with this is that its another woman that on the face of it seems like they might have been a femail equivalent of angry video game nurd or that Brit guy that reviews the shit consoles. but then when it came down to it it just came across as contrived and forced. (despite the fact that it was well produced and edited which is weird)

The only Face to cam woman I know on the internet that's good is that russan girl that does atheist videos and really she is not that good but at last she is in the top % of people male or femail I find the russen girl easer to watch and listen to than pat condel or thunder foot.

I want to see more competent women making videos in subject areas that I enjoy , there is nothing hotter than a girl that is informed confident and witty within Sceince, Games, philosphy , computing.

Its totaly unfair that Girls that are atracted to geek guys have a huge number of people to gawk at and lust over , but men such as myself have fuck all.

Its bullshit , and then u have these womens rights people saying its men repressing them which is utter shit as anny dipshit can pick up a camara and make you tube videos.

EDIT >>>>>>

"although she is a bit crazy and random, though that can be somewhat charming at times." well that's a load of shit her randomness is totally contrived and not realy that random , its the kind of random you have when sum-one watches allot of manga and starts to copy the stuff they see in them.

Anyone else remember camel toe Annie from Conan's show? I had hoped to forget that forever, but no. God, even the theme song is coming back to me.