Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
science explains why rich people don't care about you
*learned something today.
Numberphile - The Longest Time Ever Calculated
*learn
Hans Rosling: No more boring data: TEDTalks
*learn
43,252,003,274,489,856,000 Rubik's Cube Combinations
*learn
Why Do We Eat Spoiled Food?
Can't believe he neglected to mention that alcohol is water with yeast feces.
The precision repair of a wooden boat
*learned something today
How the SR-71 Blackbird's Engines Work
*learn
Quantum Mechanics explained in 60 seconds by Brian Cox
*learn
Payback
(Member Profile)
I'm still not seeing the difference. Everything you said about SB equally applies to Lantern except for the details of the problem (like it being non-scientific, and so forth).
"Allowing" opinions like SBs also makes it possible to begin to understand the "wrong" side of the argument. I've sharpened these atheist claws considerably speaking with SB.
I don't remember SB attacking anyone. Can you link to an example?
"Allowing" opinions like Lantern's makes it possible to begin to understand the "wrong" side of the argument.
SB is just a deluded, self-aggrandizing zealot. He has no qualms attacking sifters without provocation, based only on his microscopically narrow, scientifically impossible world view.
...but, I haven't seen evidence of him in months, so I'm hoping the question is moot anyway.
Foreign Foods You’re Eating Wrong
*learn
Why London is the most expensive city to build in
Fantastic story about the pub needing a view of St. Paul's.
Transforming Formula One: 2014 Rules Explained by Red Bull
*learn
Numberphile: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... = -1/12
Nope. Math certainly allows you to "shift stuff all over the place". It's the commutative property that you might have learned formally in grade 7 or so, which in terms of addition can be described as "You can add numbers together in any order you like, and the solution will be the same".
If you want to add
(1 + 2 + 3)
+(7 + 8 + 9)
---------------
30
you can rearrange them any way you like and it's the same sum:
(1 + 2 + 3)
+(9 + 8 + 7)
---------------
30
So long as all the numbers in both series get added into the pool at some point, it's good math. So shift away.
My first notion of it's bullshittedness is the second part, where S2 gets S added to itself, but shifted over. That's stupid. Math doesn't just allow you to shift stuff all over the place to help you prove an unprovable equation.
It's like asking a computer for the reason behind life, the universe, and everything, and getting the answer 21.
Cuz. Everyone knows it's 42.
Slow Mo Beatboxing
*science *learn
Slow Mo Beatboxing
Sadly, beatboxing only sounds marginally better when slowed down 50x.