संस्कृता वाक् भारतीय वायु सेना,देवनागरी!
Dvitiiyakak,syaayaa.mdvebaaliketrayobaalakaazcapa.Thante.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'look around you, water, satire, bbc, blants' to 'look around you, water, satire, bbc, thants, blants' - edited by calvados

Thank you, ants. Thants.

Babbling, the story is a bit more complex thant that. I went to grad school with him and he is not the idiot your comment would make it seem. He was invited to go to China for an Art Exhibit, and was disinvited for his political stance. He chose to go anyway. Not the brightest idea but he puts his balls where his mouth is.

Here´s an idea for your next comment: put some clothes on, burn a few, say, cigarrettes and stop living in your own bellybutton.

I have to say your comparison of China and America was at least curious.

Here is some more info´about JP:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Powderly
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/08/19/grls-james-powderly.html

"Thants!"

Agreed with ren; for the record, I downvoted "Choco Party" for the very reason you brought it up here - I imagine Ant may have had similar logic.

I hadn't seen the tennis one before, but I'll be glad to downvote it now (done) since it's not especially funny/interesting.

Going back to this vid, "Side boobs" are the key little flesh-coloured boundary line between pr0n and non pr0n for actual "sexual things" (as opposed to non-use/fondling, in which case there's more leeway, i.e. Ridgemont) according to the dynamic definition that has evolved at VS (reference: look up the naked boss video).

Since there's contact/fondling, this video just barely passes (very strategically placed arm there!).

bnsa, one thing that's key, is the importance of the nsfw tag - it's probably allowed a bit more boundary pushing at the Sift thant here was before. There are still limits (no hardcore pile-ups), but artistic/cultural/humour arguments exist to allow a vid to stay (the "Instructional Kissing Video" was great b/c it spawned the posting of the Oz version as a kind of gender balancer).

I think it's safe to *return this now.