>> ^blankfist:
Sorry, bcglorf, I'm not your step-and-fetch-it, so I am not going to answer every ridiculous claim thrown out by statist majorities. Also, I don't know you like I do others on this site so it doesn't interest me quite as much to engage, especially if you're going to be so smug about it.
Pointing a loaded gun at someone's family isn't the same as driving a car with drugs or alcohol in your system. This is a silly analogy, and once again another typically extreme and wild one you statists need to employ in an attempt to win the argument. Let me explain it simply so even a statist can understand:
Pointing a gun at someone's family means you have an intent to do direct harm.
There's no direct harm intended when driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.


Alright then, I'm your neighbour and I like to use my shotgun to shoot at cans on the fence that your children are playing behind. That would seem to be perfectly acceptable then? No intent to cause direct harm, right?

Sorry, bcglorf, I'm not your step-and-fetch-it, so I am not going to answer every ridiculous claim thrown out by statist majorities. Also, I don't know you like I do others on this site so it doesn't interest me quite as much to engage, especially if you're going to be so smug about it.

Pointing a loaded gun at someone's family isn't the same as driving a car with drugs or alcohol in your system. This is a silly analogy, and once again another typically extreme and wild one you statists need to employ in an attempt to win the argument. Let me explain it simply so even a statist can understand:

Pointing a gun at someone's family means you have an intent to do direct harm.

There's no direct harm intended when driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'nas, stereotype, step and fetch it, Nick Cannon, Affion, Satire' to 'nas, stereotype, step and fetch it, Nick Cannon, Affion Crockett, Satire' - edited by marinara

Tags for this video have been changed from 'hip hop, shuck n jive, nas, watermelon, racism, step and fetch it' to 'nas, stereotype, step and fetch it, Nick Cannon, Affion, Satire' - edited by marinara

>> ^EDD:
"Tell me, EDD, what would you prefer we talk about on here, Hitler?"
A very valid question, my dear Mr.Benjamin Tucker, my to which I'll be glad to provide an answer.
How about we Fear-Sift-Talk about real life medicine catching up to "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind", or maybe about your terrifying phobia, the fear of erections? You're the channel-owner, aren't you sharing my sentiment and concern that Fear is slowly being hijacked by videos that are even less-relevant parodies of actual fear than the "new Glenn Beck kind of 'fear'"?


Yes, but, EDD... I'm not your puppet, nor your monkey, nor your serf, nor your slave, nor your step-and-fetch-it, nor your bitch, so I really don't see how I should be writing about things you want to talk about. Take some initiative and write about them in your own Sift Talk Post, and I promise to endorse it with my fear channel.

And, no, I'm NOT sharing your fear that the "fear" channel is being hijacked by "less-relevant parodies of actual fear", because if they're using fear then it belongs whether it is becoming a parody of itself or not. I don't control what fear is; it just is.

>> ^blankfist:
>> ^mauz15:

Okay you child, you've been following me around making comments after mine as if trying to gain something from this, so let me explain something to you once and for all, and maybe the rest of the Legion of Douches are listening in so they too can benefit. Discarding your own post has never been against the rules (possibly frowned upon for discarding discussions, but not against the rules). Discarding someone else's post has always been against the rules. I figured a member since 2006 would have picked up on that not so subtlety of the Sift by now.
If I had discarded one of joedirt's posts, all of this would've been different, because I would've had it coming. But, I have NEVER discarded one of joedirt's posts. You see? I didn't break the rules. Joedirt did.
You seem to be angry that I didn't answer some question somewhere that was posed to me, but Mr. Mauz, I really want you to understand something: I don't know what the hell you are talking about, and I'm not your fucking step-and-fetch-it that is here to serve your every whim. I don't owe you anything, so do us all a favor and get rid of your false sense of entitlement.
The purpose of discarding my post was in fact to clean it up, because you and the other members of the Legion of Douche came in and rubbed your smelly, toddler cocks all over it, and I chose to discard because I posted it. When you post something, mauz, I promise I will never discard it, because I have no right to do so. I hope you find it in your being's conscience to extend the same courtesy to others on here, instead of siding with a delusional dirtbag who runs around above the law discarding whatever his warped sense of authority grants him the right to do.


I dont have to follow anything, your last comments about it are in like 2-3 places so how could I not notice? here i am checking out the latest siftalk which is about thinker but then seeblankfist still blabbering about yesterday.

I'm not siding with anyone, thats missing the point.
Like I keep saying, the inconsistency of going around the guidelines for your siftalk upvote day thing, but keeping to the guidelines when it applies to the discard of your post.

im not angry.

but your comment speaks for itself. if the comments you so thought were considered completely negative then why were they equally upvoted/downvoted? When I post something and opposing opinions appear, I will promise to not discard it and repost just because of a "i dont like your opinion go away i want all reality to agree with me" type of reasoning

All that happened is available to anyone's view, and since I rather not keep talking with someone who demands to follow a rule, then bypass another rule, talks about courtesy, but then proceeds to group opposite opinions to some imaginary label of the league of douche I'm going to go do something else.

I think I'll print this, frame it and put it next to my alarm clock so I wake up everyday with a smile.

>> ^blankfist:
>> ^mauz15:

Okay you child, you've been following me around making comments after mine as if trying to gain something from this, so let me explain something to you once and for all, and maybe the rest of the Legion of Douches are listening in so they too can benefit. Discarding your own post has never been against the rules (possibly frowned upon for discarding discussions, but not against the rules). Discarding someone else's post has always been against the rules. I figured a member since 2006 would have picked up on that not so subtlety of the Sift by now.
If I had discarded one of joedirt's posts, all of this would've been different, because I would've had it coming. But, I have NEVER discarded one of joedirt's posts. You see? I didn't break the rules. Joedirt did.
You seem to be angry that I didn't answer some question somewhere that was posed to me, but Mr. Mauz, I really want you to understand something: I don't know what the hell you are talking about, and I'm not your fucking step-and-fetch-it that is here to serve your every whim. I don't owe you anything, so do us all a favor and get rid of your false sense of entitlement.
The purpose of discarding my post was in fact to clean it up, because you and the other members of the Legion of Douche came in and rubbed your smelly, toddler cocks all over it, and I chose to discard because I posted it. When you post something, mauz, I promise I will never discard it, because I have no right to do so. I hope you find it in your being's conscience to extend the same courtesy to others on here, instead of siding with a delusional dirtbag who runs around above the law discarding whatever his warped sense of authority grants him the right to do.

>> ^mauz15:

Okay you child, you've been following me around making comments after mine as if trying to gain something from this, so let me explain something to you once and for all, and maybe the rest of the Legion of Douches are listening in so they too can benefit. Discarding your own post has never been against the rules (possibly frowned upon for discarding discussions, but not against the rules). Discarding someone else's post has always been against the rules. I figured a member since 2006 would have picked up on that not so subtlety of the Sift by now.

If I had discarded one of joedirt's posts, all of this would've been different, because I would've had it coming. But, I have NEVER discarded one of joedirt's posts. You see? I didn't break the rules. Joedirt did.

You seem to be angry that I didn't answer some question somewhere that was posed to me, but Mr. Mauz, I really want you to understand something: I don't know what the hell you are talking about, and I'm not your fucking step-and-fetch-it that is here to serve your every whim. I don't owe you anything, so do us all a favor and get rid of your false sense of entitlement.

The purpose of discarding my post was in fact to clean it up, because you and the other members of the Legion of Douche came in and rubbed your smelly, toddler cocks all over it, and I chose to discard because I posted it. When you post something, mauz, I promise I will never discard it, because I have no right to do so. I hope you find it in your being's conscience to extend the same courtesy to others on here, instead of siding with a delusional dirtbag who runs around above the law discarding whatever his warped sense of authority grants him the right to do.