search results matching tag: rommel

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (4)     Sift Talk (7)     Blogs (4)     Comments (43)   

true romance-gary oldman and his iconic character drexl

lucky760 says...

Just finished it. Wow, what a phenomenal fucking movie. I have to get the blu-ray.

Absolutely loved it. Can't believe I missed out on it for 21 years.

P.S. Funny that his dad's dog's name is Rommel. (It's a very uncommon name, so whenever I hear it, I jump to attention.)

lucky760 (Member Profile)

lucky760 (Member Profile)

lucky760 (Member Profile)

lucky760 (Member Profile)

lucky760 (Member Profile)

SiftDebate: What are the societal benefits to having guns? (Controversy Talk Post)

gwiz665 says...

As with all things, it's not necessarily a law change that need to happen. Laws don't drive the zeitgeist, the zeitgeist drive laws (or should).

People need to be dissuaded from wanting to have guns. In Europe, people don't really want a gun, and don't even see a need for one. Sure, there are hunters and they have guns, and sure you can get one if you're in a dangerous area with bears and shit, but actually getting a gun is when you're hunted by mafia or something like that and you're desperate. Why would you ever want to walk around with a gun? I don't really get it.

Perhaps people have a fantasy about being a hero, where they shoot the bad guy. Everyone has that as a kid; most kids also grow up.

There's something deeply satisfying about firing a gun - power at your fingertips. Control. Maybe it's a control thing. People don't like to be out of control, with a gun they always have something to fall back on to control the situation.

Maybe it's a macho thing, although women carry guns too. I don't know the statistic of it, but I would imagine more men do than women. Men are intrinsically destructive while women are creative - it's our nature. We men beat up our rivals to gain access to that sweetest fruit of all: peach. Perhaps it's an extension of power; an penis extension. Don't pull the trigger, squeeze it tenderly. You are the gun; look down the aim at your target and fire.

Maybe there's some brain vs brawn in it. I would wager good money that as intelligence goes up, gun ownership goes down. No statistics to back it up, but I'd love to see if it's true. Brains are taking over everything - it's the decade of the Nerd. Joss Whedon and JJ Abrams could get all the girls and gets all the admiration in the big world, while Dick McKickaball failed to make the team and married Candace the exotic dancer his friends hired for him on his 21st birthday. But at least he could shoot JJ Abrams in the face with his 4½ inch death stick.

Society doesn't really gain much from guns does it?

It has its own market and thus gets people to move money around with someone around to skim the top. dft said this in point 2 as well. This could be done for worse stuff though - snuff porn has a market; heroin has a market.

Mutually Assured Destruction is always a fun acronym to throw around. If everyone does eye for an eye, the world will go blind, I've heard somewhere. Probably a shitty western or something.

Feelings of security? If I have a gun, do I feel safer from the people around me that may or may not also have guns? I would feel safer in my home, I think. If I feared home invasions. Home invasions are a weird thing; very rare in europe to the best of my knowledge, even though we don't have guns. Seems like something that would only happen if there was an enormous disparity between poor and rich, making the poor desperate (and lazy) enough to want to do a home invasion. If Brian the Aryan Man-God makes 10 million billion $$ a year, and Rommel the Dirty Mexican doesn't get anything because he has to pay child support off his social security and also cover his meth addication, then the chance of Rommel doing a home invasion is greater than if Rommel makes half of what Brian does. Maybe we need to raise the floor, instead of raising the ceiling on the extrema of wealth to lose the desire of guns.

Maybe it's all of the factors at once, and we have someone like the NRA pushing everyone to want all of them. I want security. I'm afraid. I have a small dick. Home invasions happen all the time. Schools get shot by crazies, I need to defend myself.

Bang!

Bang! Bang! Bang! Bang!

There... the demons went away. Guns are your friends.

On Seniority for Power Point Accrual (Sift Talk Post)

PlayhousePals says...

Thank you Dag [and Rommel] ... one of the best things I've found with the Sift is that you two truly care about the site AND it's members. That's reason enough to stick around and try to do my best to help make this a successful venture for us all. Mad Love to you.

lucky760 (Member Profile)

PlayhousePals says...

Hi Rommel! Hope you aren't stressing too badly with the change. I feel for you.

I just posted this video a few minutes ago: http://videosift.com/video/The-Suicide-Mission and have discovered that it is not showing up for me in my unsifted video queue NOR is it listed near the top of the Upcoming Video page. The only way I can locate it is by doing a video search by title. This is the same problem I had on occasion with the old Videosift format. My other newly posted video: http://videosift.com/video/The-Simpsons-Writer-James-L-Brooks-Favorite-Moments is right where it should be in my unsifted queue and in the Upcoming listings. My channel page shows I have 6 unsifted videos but when I click the link only the 5 show up. Any clue as to the glitch for me?

Take care and let me know if I can be of any help

cheRi

Can't submit South Park Studios' embedded videos? (Geek Talk Post)

radx says...

Beware: fugly code incoming.

<object id="1139880740" width="500" height="395" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"><param value="true" name="allowfullscreen"/><param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess"/><param value="high" name="quality"/><param value="true" name="cachebusting"/><param value="#000000" name="bgcolor"/><param name="movie" value="http://www.archive.org/flow/flowplayer.commercial-3.2.1.swf" /><param value="config={'key':'#$aa4baff94a9bdcafce8','playlist':['format=Thumbnail?.jpg',{'autoPlay':false,'url':'troubleshooting_512kb.mp4'}],'clip':{'autoPl
ay':true,'baseUrl':'http://archive.org/download/HampshireLinuxUserGroupTroubleshootingTools/','scaling':'fit','provider':'h264streaming'},'canvas':{'b
ackgroundColor':'#000000','backgroundGradient':'none'},'plugins':{'controls':{'playlist':false,'fullscreen':true,'height':26,'backgroundColor':'#00000
0','autoHide':{'fullscreenOnly':true}},'h264streaming':{'url':'http://www.archive.org/flow/flowplayer.pseudostreaming-3.2.1.swf'}},'contextMenu':[{},'
-','Flowplayer v3.2.1']}" name="flashvars"/><embed wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.archive.org/flow/flowplayer.commercial-3.2.1.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="395" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" cachebusting="true" bgcolor="#000000" quality="high" flashvars="config={'key':'#$aa4baff94a9bdcafce8','playlist':['format=Thumbnail?.jpg',{'autoPlay':false,'url':'troubleshooting_512kb.mp4'}],'clip':{'au
toPlay':true,'baseUrl':'http://archive.org/download/HampshireLinuxUserGroupTroubleshootingTools/','scaling':'fit','provider':'h264streaming'},'canvas'
:{'backgroundColor':'#000000','backgroundGradient':'none'},'plugins':{'controls':{'playlist':false,'fullscreen':true,'height':26,'backgroundColor':'#0
00000','autoHide':{'fullscreenOnly':true}},'h264streaming':{'url':'http://www.archive.org/flow/flowplayer.pseudostreaming-3.2.1.swf'}},'contextMenu':[
{},'-','Flowplayer v3.2.1']}"></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/></object>


That's the result of 30 minutes of experiments, but it seems to work. Makeshift code at its best.

I picked this video at random. For any other clip, you'd have to replace the parts I marked in bold. The actual video file is linked twice (troubleshooting_512kb.mp4) and so is the respective folder (http://archive.org/download/HampshireLinuxUserGroupTroubleshootingTools/). Those are the only four entries that need to be changed, as far as I can see.

So, who volunteers to give it a shot?

Edit: bugger, forgot to replace those pesky code characters.

Edit #2: Argh, I hate that bloody code. Now I removed the html tags.

Edit #3: Apparently, those bold tags are not welcome this time around. They make copy-paste much more difficult, so I left them out.
>> ^chingalera:

Oh hey Rommel...I would really love to be able to embed videos from webarchive.org (the wayback machine)
There are hundreds of great public domain and art, ephemeral videos there. They have never worked in the past and i suspect there's simple tweaking to code involved.....have tried and failed-

Can't submit South Park Studios' embedded videos? (Geek Talk Post)

ant says...

>> ^chingalera:

Oh hey Rommel...I would really love to be able to embed videos from webarchive.org (the wayback machine)
There are hundreds of great public domain and art, ephemeral videos there. They have never worked in the past and i suspect there's simple tweaking to code involved.....have tried and failed-


@dag and @lucky760 should add this host for future versions.

Can't submit South Park Studios' embedded videos? (Geek Talk Post)

chingalera says...

Oh hey Rommel...I would really love to be able to embed videos from webarchive.org (the wayback machine)
There are hundreds of great public domain and art, ephemeral videos there. They have never worked in the past and i suspect there's simple tweaking to code involved.....have tried and failed-

pumkinandstorm ON THE NEW gem (WOOHAHHAA) (Femme Talk Post)

Unban choggie, blankfist and dft. (User Poll by MrFisk)

gwiz665 says...

Choggie had his chance and blew it. That's done.

dft is self-imposed. He issued a mea culpa in what he is temp banned for, and that should be that. He's coming back in force.

Blankfist left. I think it's overkill to ban him for doing what he did - at least from what he told me he did. Once we've had siftups and such, that cat's out of the bag already is it not? Shit, I know Jeremy, Heath, Rommel etc. from siftup posts anyway. It's not trivial to post "personal information" but there's a degree of discretion in it too. Saying "lucky lives at XX street and hates muslims" is obviously retardedly stupid, but from what I hear blankfist just linked to some movie thing dft was in as a kid. Not a huge deal I'd say, also considering they've actually met in real life and shit.

For what it's worth, I like both dft and blankfist even though I disagree about stuff with both on some issues, and I hate how those two bickering with each other has escalated to this level of paranoia and annoyance. You're both alright, now kiss and make up!

In anycase, dft and blankfist should both be unbanned in my humble opinion. I'm not sure bf would even come back either way.

lucky760 (Member Profile)



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon