Yeah, it's dead. MLBA apparently had all the YouTube vids yanked. Thanks for finding.

In reply to this comment by DavidRaine:
Looks dead, unfortunately -- I don't have the star power to mark it though.

>> ^HaricotVert:
The only justification for this is if he was bet several million dollars to do so.

Or when the Red Sox won the series...

I'm not a big fan of Thompson to start with so my opinion could be biased. But to me he really blew it with his own video that they showed. Instead of using the 30 seconds to tell us what he will do for this country he went for the "attack ad" approach and told us why we shouldn't vote for Romney and Huckabee.

Also another thing I noticed about what made this debate suck was that at least in the Dems YouTube debate that had many of the people who's videos were used in the audience and allowed them to follow up or at least say if they think their question was answered or not. I believe they only did that once in the Rep debate.

And what is with the stupid "I am not smarter then a 5th grader" questions they keep using to end these debates? The last one for the last dems debate was for Hillary "Do you prefer pearls or diamonds?" and the last for the Rep debate was for Giuliani about "Yankees vs. Red Sox". WTF? I mean literally WTF?! This is supposed to be a big joke to us?

Tags for this video have been changed from 'red sox, brilliant' to 'red sox, brilliant, 40s' - edited by swampgirl

Must have been the same year the Red Sox beat the Yankees (place winking smiling face here).

Gross abuse of power, absolutely misuse of power. I live in Boston, and I saw plenty of fights, and rioting controled without the use of Tasers when the Red Sox won the world series (I really don't want to hear any hits on the red sox). I watched as two officers broke up a fight without the use of a single "weapon". Once the group was seperated the police officers used a verbal aresanal to get the crowd to disperse. Sure, they used the threat of the taser, but never once used it. It seems hard to believe that campus police couldn't find another way to handle an individual who wouldn't show his identification or leave the premises. I hate to say this, but it seems like those campus cops got off on showing what bad asses they could be. It's very similar to a technique SS officers used to keep work crews in line in WWII. They would take the offender, or disruptor, and shoot him/her in front of the entire work crew. Fear is the best deterant. I know that analogy is very extreme, but it's kinda what happened here. I'm sorry, but I've been told by state police that if a police officer is ever asked for his badge number and information, he is required to give it.