Not dupe of. Parody of. See the related tag.

It's pretty obvious to anyone that, y'know. Was alive for the past five years. blankfist was not duped.

...not...dupe...or even close...thin ice there

>> ^ctrlaltbleach:

not dupe


Well, this one is just the ending.

*not dupe

>> ^Trancecoach:

ack! beat me by a few minutes, despite my seeing this video an hour ago! Good sift.
Sort of a huge bummer that this (recently-turned) 19 year old won't compete at the 2012 London Olympics in a few weeks...


Why not??!?!! ~

Dupe of http://videosift.com/video/Michelle-Jenneke-Warms-Up-with-a-Sexy-Dance with a different song?

After watching your post for the clone wars, I found three videos at the bottom as "suggested links" and they were all the same video. three different submissions of the same video. (not dupes of yours)

I've duped them but they are still need of an isdupe.
Would you be so kind as to isdupe them for me?

They are:
Original - http://videosift.com/video/Darth-Maul-returns-Star-Wars-Clone-Wars
Dupe - http://videosift.com/video/Star-Wars-Clone-Wars-Darth-Maul-Returns-Trailer (needs isdupe)
Dupe - http://videosift.com/video/The-Clone-Wars-Season-4-Darth-Maul-Returns (needs isdupe)

Cheers and thanks

I'd like to put a vote in for "not dupe"... the other one is edited for people with attention span issues and/or cognitive impairment.
>> ^ant:

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
http://videosift.com/video/Genius-Dog-Knows-1000-Words>> ^jonny:
pretty sure it's a dupe, but I can't find the original.


dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Genius-Dog-Knows-1000-Words

>> ^NetRunner:

>> ^kir_mokum:
dupe of http://videosift.com/video/Mike-Daisey-on-Collaborating-with-Corporat

ions

Bah, figures.
Unless anyone has an objection, let's not dupe it until it ages off the frontpage. It'd be a shame to kill this video's hotness prematurely.


I second, First time I've noticed this one on VS.

>> ^kir_mokum:

dupe of http://videosift.com/video/Mike-Daisey-on-Collaborating-with-Corporat
ions


Bah, figures.

Unless anyone has an objection, let's not dupe it until it ages off the frontpage. It'd be a shame to kill this video's hotness prematurely.

>> ^BoneRemake:

In my opinion,No, not Dupe, but then again to me this one has no place here because of the other one.
Its a line that is being toed, its pretty much the same content on all levels(hah) but there are discernible differences negating what one would call a dupe over.
Kill it and move forward, thats my motto.


In spite of the fact that it adds a minute of new music that's not in the other one!?! That's being really liberal with the dupe definition, I think.

In my opinion,No, not Dupe, but then again to me this one has no place here because of the other one.

Its a line that is being toed, its pretty much the same content on all levels(hah) but there are discernible differences negating what one would call a dupe over.

Kill it and move forward, thats my motto.

There has to be some guidelines on what clips of existing posts are allowed to be re-submitted. It'd be a bit much to allow each 1 minute portion of the synchronized walking video to be submitted by 8 different people.

As far as dupeof goes, that is absolutely correct. It should not be used on videos that are not a reasonable replacement of the original post.

The Posting Guidelines have been updated for what are not dupes and what dupes should or should not have dupeof invoked.

I'll let @dag be the final arbiter on this post.

Then I must admit a stupid error and apologize to you.

I rejected submission of this earlier this day as I noted the Private status as reflected in my *deading of it. I did not and would not dupe sans access.

Later, I blearily must have mistyped and accessed erroneously as I watched what I mistook as a embed fixed vid. Hence....

I am sorry for it. I will refrain from such activities when I am asleep or close to it.
In reply to this comment by SDGundamX:
Also, @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/MarineGunrock" title="member since July 13th, 2007" class="profilelink"><strong style="color:#0000ff">MarineGunrock

FYI, it wasn't a dupe. It was filmed on the same day by a different person and had different footage. But then they made it private. Was gonna kill it anyway because I couldn't find a replacement, so thanks I guess.

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
*isdupe>> ^MarineGunrock:

dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Russian-backhoe-swimming-pool

It's not attempting to. It's not focusing on the chivalry part at all. It's focusing ont he guy wake-boarding down the street.

Now explain why the other linked videos are not dupes.

If the answer is "It's 100% subjective based on the whims and moods of 2 gold level sifters" then at least that's something.>> ^campionidelmondo:

The shorter one is missing the part where the guy stops to carry over the girl. It's a dupe, because the fact that it's shorter does not carry any additional benefit. In fact, it omits part of the event.