Yeah, I thought they were just joking about the moon conspiracy.

Agreed with some of it, but they lost me when they started talking about the moon conspiracy towards the end. Give me a break.

This video is on www.theage.com.au news website today with the byline "Video has emerged of Buzz Aldrin dealing with a moon conspiracy theorist - the man is left seeing stars".

It emerged over three years ago! And they say the mainstream media is no longer relevant...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'edwin aldrin, moon conspiracy, fake, punch' to 'buzz aldrin, moon conspiracy, fake, punch' - edited by rasch187

Why the in your face conspiracy nuts attitude? Speaking for myself, most of the time when I've meet people who believe these conspiracies they have acted as though I'm the biggest most gullible moron on the planet for thinking we landed on the moon. And when I present claims counter to points they are making, suddenly I've been drinking "The man's" koolaid. I've actually lost a friend because of that.

So I guess to put it another way my experiences with moon conspiracy theorists, has never been one about healthy skepticism, its been about taking the skeptical evidence and stretching it around their massive egos so they can feel smarter than everyone else.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'aldrin, moon conspiracy, fake, punch' to 'edwin aldrin, moon conspiracy, fake, punch' - edited by therealblankman

the "moon conspiracy" ?!?!?

It does look very fishy indeed. The fact that towers 1 & 2 collapsed perfectly is very fishy. Although, every time I see one of these things I have to remind myself to objectively consider the source. It is obvious that the purpose of this clip is to convince the viewer that building 7 was taken down with explosives. So my next two questions are: Who made this video? Was this a conclusion that was reached through an objective process or did the creator set out to find evidence that supported his predetermined conclusion.

I bought the moon conspiracy hook-line-and-sinker when I first saw it. Then someone showed me some very rational explanations to some (not all) of the conspiracy's points. So now I just don't know. I would love to see the counter points to this.