Tags for this video have been changed from 'breasts, boobs, bra, lingerie, stockings, soccer, samsung, lcd' to 'breasts, boobs, bewbs, bra, lingerie, stockings, soccer, samsung, lcd' - edited by calvados

It's just a PR stunt from a lingerie company. It's not like women did this independently and the media is covering it because it has some level of popular support. They're covering it because a story about pretty underwear models prancing around in public is not bad for ratings.

The most irritating thing to me is the message Triumph International is trying to feed women. "Sick of how body conscious and objectified we've made you in the past? It's all good now, you're classical art, not delicious fruit! Buy more frilly underthings, you'll feel better about yourself this time."


>> ^L0cky:

"They're being renamed" - By who?
"I was a pear and now I'm a Matisse!" - According to who?
Stories like these just show me how some people lead their lives in some kind of ignorant fugue, somehow taking for granted that there's some kind of grand master plan; or absolute truth; or hidden authority on absolutely everything; and the're just drifting along accepting everything they hear.
Especially if it's on the news; or written in a book they've read; or in the internets; recorded, or communicated to them in any way - then it must be true!
I seem to spend a lot of my life asking people basics questions like 'According to who?' and 'On what basis?' after they've just asserted, or inferred something as a fact; and am almost always disappointed to hear that they don't know the answer; they were just running with it for no apparent reason or critical thought.
This video is just one example.
/probably guilty of doing the exact same thing on a constant basis
/harsh and inappropriate rant

Tags for this video have been changed from 'puppies, lingerie, super bowl, conan, o brien, lol, check out the rack' to 'puppies, lingerie, super bowl, conan, o brien, lol, check out the rack, bewbs, boobs' - edited by dystopianfuturetoday

On the interactive site below each girl's picture it says click here to buy. Apparently they're referring to the lingerie.

http://www.djmick.co.uk/girls/jessica-jane-clement-lynx-rise-lingerie-pictures/

>> ^bobknight33:
Yep Republicans are upfront with their money while the left are so corrupt that they have to hide, launder and shield how they give and receive money.
Thanks Netrunner for showing us the transparency between the parties. Some more please.
Obama = the 1 term president - HA HA
Aren't you guys ashamed of your party yet?


So... let us 'pretend' your argument is sound and that the billions republicans 'have' hidden dot truly exist... and while we are at pretending, let's put on our pretend pants too! You know the ones where the whole is near the anus? You got yours on yet? Good...

Now, republicans do not hide the fact that they take money from slutty Fox (Think Lingerie Football, yay!) And let us assume they take more than 1 million from other degrading and/or shady sources... And let's say that the democrats hide their assets...

Same crime, but more transparency (Which remember, transparency in no way equates to honesty, btw...) Kind of like anal raping a cow right? One republican comes out transparently, so conservatives are kool! (See, they are soo cool I spelled them with a k!) But democrats hide the fact that they have anal-raping sex with cows, which make them horrible. Btw, cows = Americans.

That's how you know they are ready, it's like a meat thermometer, but for girls.

Upvode for gratuitous use of "closeups".>> ^raverman:

One solid fart and your undies fall off.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

oh, yeeeeeah, that's what I was forgetting! lol>> ^ponceleon:

Wait... no one? Really?
Okay, I will
NSFW

Neither was Poland.

>> ^Kalle:

>> ^quantumushroom:
Never wanted strudel so bad in my life...just made the "Heil!" gesture...with no hands.

Strudel is not german...

>> ^quantumushroom:

Never wanted strudel so bad in my life...just made the "Heil!" gesture...with no hands.


Strudel is not german...

>> ^Unsung_Hero:

Great, now I have to go watch porn...


Somebody get this poor guy a tissue!

>> ^gwiz665:

So do they put that one end up their ass? How does the damn thing stay on? Did physics change while I was looking away??


Lulz

>> ^raverman:

One solid fart and your undies fall off.


ROFL

I wouldn't trust wikipedia as a source for wisdom on this subject.

There are traditional and philosophical reasons for this practice that are simply outside of the western worldview/perspective. Not that I necessarily agree with it, or that it ought to continue, but that, from a cross-cultural perspective, a greater sensitivity as to the origins and purpose/role of the practice will probably see more mileage in terms of its transition into a more contemporary practice than outright misconception, misinterpretation, and misunderstanding.


>> ^Shepppard:

>> ^Trancecoach:
I think the West has a very distorted view of the role and purpose of the burqa.

Read up. I'm pretty sure we all know why women wear burqas, but there's latent effects of them, too.
It essentially labels women as property of their owners, only to be seen by them. Stripped of any unique identity in public, only ever able to be seen by.. and I quote:
" their husbands, or their fathers, or their husband's fathers, or their sons, or their husband's sons, or their brothers, or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their womenfolk, or what their right hands rule (slaves), or the followers from the men who do not feel sexual desire, or the small children to whom the nakedness of women is not apparent, and not to strike their feet (on the ground) so as to make known what they hide of their adornments. And turn in repentance to Allah together, O you the faithful, in order that you are successful"
So, essentially, Immediate family and slaves are allowed to see you without a burqa.

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by kulpims.