>> ^imstellar28:
>> ^punisher:
imstellar,
Your comment about "maybe he was a murderer who stole an officers clothes" thing, wouldn't last 2 minutes in court. In fact I believe that that has already been tried before

can you point me to the case of person who killed cop after cop shot puppy vs the state? you are so hung up on precision you fail to understand any of the basic concepts. it doesn't have to be "a murderer who stole an officers clothes" it could be "a cop who went insane" etc. etc. etc. fill in whatever story you want.
if you are the state, you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the cop was not a danger to anyone else. if a cop walks onto my property and discharges his firearm without restraint you better believe I have the right to detain him with force. if he attempts to respond with lethal force (i say drop the weapon and he doesn't) i have every legal right to defend myself with lethal force. let a jury of people watch that video and see if ALL of them vote guilty on a murder charge, because if they don't you are going free.


1) I will try to find the case in question. It wasn't a "cop shoots dog, then owner shoots cop case" it was a "someone shoots cop and says they thought it was an imposter/fake cop/someone whole stole a uniform case"

2) Your statement "if you are the state, you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the cop was not a danger to anyone else" is incorrect. In our system, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, which in this case would be you, if you are going after the state for the shooting. If the state was going after you for shooting the cop in your scenerio, then the burden of proof would be on the state to prove that you shot a cop, BUT they wouldn't have to prove that the cop "was not a danger to anyone else". The burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove that scenerio A happened, A being you shooting the cop. You could try to show doubt and convince the jury that the cop "went insane" as you put it, but since the cop was pretty calm and collected during the video, I doubt that would happen.


Johnald_Chaffinch> The cop was not trespassing.

Why do you have to assume that we're all boys? I'm all woman, and I masturbated to Sarah Palin, the imposter in the video, and swampgirl.

To me the amazing thing isn't really how realistic it looks, but how there is still definitely something uncanny about it. Its truly weird and fascinating to be able to notice every single minuscule discrepancy in the cg so effortlessly.

It reminds of a video about neurological phenomena, specifically a disorder in which the ability to recognise faces is impaired. Sufferers are incapable of recognising their own mother, but more than that they are often repulsed and distrustful of them because the brain thinks the face it sees is an imposter. (I think sufferers can still recognise faces, but the link pairing facial recognition to memory is damaged, so they see a familiar face, but don't recognise it as their mother.)

Anyway, I suppose our ability to recognise an imposter isn't as bizarre as our repulsion to the imposter. Why have we evolved to be quite so wary of things trying to be human?

Like anyone else, I'd like to believe these claims, but they make no explanations for why things like the following do not require Americans to pay income taxes:

• Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution
  "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises"
  
  
• The Sixteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution
  "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived"
  
  
• The Internal Revenue Code
  (published as Title 26 of the United States Code (USC), linked ^above by T-man) which is law codified by Congress

(Just a playful jab at conspiracy theorists. )

The Real Blankfist is dead. The Blankfist we have on VS is a imposter just like BillOreilly.

>> ^Issykitty:
That's cute and all, but I'm WAAAAY smarter than this imposter. Plus, I prefer Turkey/Pumpkin-flavored cake!


Lies. [grin]

That's cute and all, but I'm WAAAAY smarter than this imposter. Plus, I prefer Turkey/Pumpkin-flavored cake!

I can't make this shit up! LOL!!!
>> ^quantumushroom:
If I wanted to harm Black Americans, I'd join the Democrats.
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
Now... HERE'S a video that probably appeals to QM. He'll be able to join with no difficulty... unlike this imposter.

If I wanted to harm Black Americans, I'd join the Democrats.

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
Now... HERE'S a video that probably appeals to QM. He'll be able to join with no difficulty... unlike this imposter.

Now... HERE'S a video that probably appeals to QM. He'll be able to join with no difficulty... unlike this imposter.

Imposter

I are here! I spies my name in the top Catsanddogs Sift... yet it is not me. Unlike this imposter, I is a genius kitty!

I don't think chogs is an imposter... just his own animal, as yet unspeciated.

If you can't decide what someone is they could be an Imposter.

Although I have on occasion tried to be a Diplomat, I guess I'd have to be a Propeller Head.

Rotfl. Kill that imposter!