search results matching tag: `hart`

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

	Videos (188)		Sift Talk (2)		Blogs (24)		Comments (241)

Doodling in Math Class: Dragon Dungeons

siftbot

says...

Vi Hart -- Doodling in Math Class: DRAGONS has been added as a related post - related requested by Zawash.

Outtakes From The Lyft Remote

PlayhousePals

says...

Here's the original video:

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Ice-Cube-Kevin-Hart-and-Conan-Share-A-Lyft-Car

Outtakes From The Lyft Remote

siftbot

says...

Ice Cube, Kevin Hart and Conan Share A Lyft Car has been added as a related post - related requested by PlayhousePals.

YouTube Rewind 2013: What Does 2013 Say?

Zawash

says...

brycewi19

said:

Way too many people/personalities that I simply don't recognize at all, despite the fact that I'm on the Sift several times a day.

I guess most of these Youtubers are simply not Sift-worthy!

Science Vlogger reads her comments

siftbot

says...

Vi Hart - How To Toothpaste has been added as a related post - related requested by bareboards2 on that post.

Vi Hart - How To Toothpaste

bareboards2

says...

As I watched this, I thought -- FUCK, the sexualization of Vi Hart. FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK.

Thanks for proving my distress.

FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK.

(Is this really her? Maybe somebody stole her voice? PLEASE oh please oh please oh please, let this not be Vi Hart's work.)

nanrod

said:

I would never have guessed that Vi Hart would have such a nice ass.

blahpook (Member Profile)

siftbot

says...

Your video, Vi Hart - How To Toothpaste, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 5 Badge!

Vi Hart - How To Toothpaste

nanrod

says...

I would never have guessed that Vi Hart would have such a nice ass.

Thug Cop Smashes Woman's Face Over DUI

siftbot

says...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'dui, statist idiot, face first' to 'dui, statist idiot, face first, cassandra feuerstein, officer michael hart, skokie' - edited by xxovercastxx

messenger (Member Profile)

siftbot

says...

Your video, Vi Hart -- Doodling in Math Class: DRAGONS, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Lesbian Woman Answers Question About Being a Butch

chingalera

says...

Subscribed to Hart, self-described Quierdo/with refreshing gay aura-

noam chomsky-how climate change became a liberal hoax

ksven47

says...

On a daily basis, politicians, like Obama, and pundits in the lamestream media mindlessly bump their gums about global warming, uh... "climate change" (the term employed when the earth stopped warming), without having the slightest idea what they are talking about. Most simply parrot the line about a "so-called "consensus of scientists," without the slightest knowledge of the science or data, or point to extreme weather events as “proof.” Al Gore and Henry Waxman have become masters at this. Noam Chomsky should stick to linguistics. Once he ventures outside of his specialty, he’s just a run-of-the-mill leftist loon.

Science does not operate on the basis of consensus, but provable fact and hard DATA that is replicable. No one can prove that C02 causes warming, apart from the other forces that are chiefly determinative of climate--solar output, cosmic rays (and their effect on cloud cover), the earth's elliptical orbit, its axial tilt, etc. The earth's climate cycle has been in place for eons and is not being altered by any significant degree by anthropogenic CO2. In fact, 99% of the people who believe in the "global warming crisis" cannot even tell you what the current globally-averaged temperature is, nor how much it may have risen over the past century (or any other time frame for that matter). Nor do they know that the current globally averaged temperature is 1-2 degrees C below what it was during the Medieval Warm Period, when human activity could not have been a factor.

Neither temperatures nor sea level rise are accelerating. Temperatures haven't risen since 1997. And even the U.N. predicts just an 8.5" to 18.5" sea level rise by 2100 (2007 IPCC Report), far below the 20 feet predicted by Al Gore, or the 35 feet predicted by Joe Lieberman in 2002. In fact, sea levels have been rising at a rate of about 7" per century since the end of the last age 12,500 years ago, so the U.N.'s predicted range is likely to fall at the low end.

Weather stations around the world are notoriously unreliable, many placed in locations now near asphalt parking lots, etc., replicating the urban island heat effect. Calculating the globally averaged temperature in an enormously complex task. compounded when scientific frauds like Phil Jones and Michael Mann (of the infamous "hockey stick" graph) hide, and would not supply, their data because it does not support their predetermined conclusions of anthropogenic global warming. (Climategate). This is not surprising, however, since thousands of scientists stand to collectively lose billions in federal research grants if the hoax is exposed (more than $80 billion has already been spent on such research, nearly 500 times what oil companies have spent to fund so-called “skeptics”), a fact totally lost, or grossly misrepresented, by global warming religionists.

The fact is: even if the earth's temperature is rising marginally, from natural forces, it will be far better for mankind than falling temperatures. It will result in higher crop yields and less death around the world. More than twice as many people die of extreme cold than extreme heat.

Contrary to morons such as Al Gore (who will never agree to debate the topic, so fearful is he of getting his clock cleaned), scientific evidence clearly shows that we have had no increase in extreme weather events. Dr. Roger Pielke Jr., Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Colorado, summed up the latest science on weather extremes when he wrote that “There is no evidence that disasters are getting worse because of climate change....There's really no evidence that we're in the midst of an extreme weather era - whether man has influenced climate or not,”
Pielke also explained that the data does not support linking Hurricane Sandy to man-made global warming. “Sandy was terrible, but we're currently in a relative hurricane 'drought'.” But that doesn’t stop politicians from trying to make political hay from them.

Much of the gum bumping about "global warming" may be attributed to the political aspirations of Al Gore who hoped to ride an environmental white horse into the White House. It all comes down to a politically-motivated overreaction to a 0.35 degree C increase in globally-averaged temperatures in the period from 1978-1997. Since 1998, temperatures have flat-lined. They are now at 14.5 degrees Celsius which is exactly where they were in 1997. What this amounted to was a hyperbolic response to a temporary and cyclical climate phenomenon, which has been replicated a myriad of times in human history.

The climate history of the 20th century, by itself, contradicts the CO2 equals warming hypothesis. From 1913-1945, CO2 was not a factor and temperatures rose slightly. And from 1945-1977, temperatures fell in the face of rising CO2. It was only in the period from 1978-1997 that temperatures and CO2 rose simultaneously. But since CO2 is likely to continue to rise for the foreseeable future, we will have periods of both rising and falling temperatures in the face of rising CO2.

The scientific travesty is that many politicians are trying to transform CO2 into a “pollutant” requiring draconian federal regulations whose only effect will be to stifle economic growth. CO2 is a harmless trace element constituting just 0.039 per cent of the earth's atmosphere (390 parts per million by volume). It's what humans and animals exhale and its presence helps plant production. 500 million years ago, CO was 20 times more prevalent in our atmosphere. The aim is to convince the uninformed that carbon dioxide is the equivalent of carbon monoxide, a highly toxic gas.

With time and historical perspective, the global warming crisis will turn out to be the greatest scientific fraud in history. But that won’t politicians from exploiting it in the short term.

On a daily basis, politicians, like Obama, and pundits mindlessly bump their gums about global warming, uh... "climate change" (the term employed when the earth stopped warming), without having the slightest idea what they are talking about. Malloy is just the latest in a long line of demagogic politicians trying to capitalize on the scare. Most simply parrot the line about a "so-called "consensus of scientists," without the slightest knowledge of the science or data, or point to extreme weather events as “proof.”

Science does not operate on the basis of consensus, but provable fact and hard DATA that is replicable. No one can prove that C02 causes warming, apart from the other forces that are chiefly determinative of climate--solar output, cosmic rays (and their effect on cloud cover), the earth's elliptical orbit, its axial tilt, etc. The earth's climate cycle has been in place for eons and is not being altered by any significant degree by anthropogenic CO2. In fact, 99% of the people who believe in the "global warming crisis" cannot even tell you what the current globally-averaged temperature is, nor how much it may have risen over the past century (or any other time frame for that matter). Nor do they know that the current globally averaged temperature is 1-2 degrees C below what it was during the Medieval Warm Period, when human activity could not have been a factor.

Neither temperatures nor sea level rise are accelerating. Temperatures haven't risen since 1997. And even the U.N. predicts just an 8.5" to 18.5" sea level rise by 2100 (2007 IPCC Report), far below the 20 feet predicted by Al Gore, or the 35 feet predicted by Joe Lieberman in 2002. In fact, sea levels have been rising at a rate of about 7" per century since the end of the last age 12,500 years ago, so the U.N.'s predicted range is likely to fall at the low end.

Weather stations around the world are notoriously unreliable, many placed in locations now near asphalt parking lots, etc., replicating the urban island heat effect. Calculating the globally averaged temperature in an enormously complex task. compounded when scientific frauds like Phil Jones and Michael Mann (of the infamous "hockey stick" graph) hide, and would not supply, their data because it does not support their predetermined conclusions of anthropogenic global warming. (Climategate). This is not surprising, however, since thousands of scientists stand to collectively lose billions in federal research grants if the hoax is exposed (more than $80 billion has already been spent on such research, nearly 500 times what oil companies have spent to fund so-called “skeptics”).

The fact is: even if the earth's temperature is rising marginally, from natural forces, it will be far better for mankind than falling temperatures. It will result in higher crop yields and less death around the world. More than twice as many people die of extreme cold than extreme heat. The scientific evidence clearly shows that we have had no increase in extreme weather events. Dr. Roger Pielke Jr., Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Colorado, summed up the latest science on weather extremes when he wrote that “There is no evidence that disasters are getting worse because of climate change....There's really no evidence that we're in the midst of an extreme weather era - whether man has influenced climate or not,”
Pielke also explained that the data does not support linking Hurricane Sandy to man-made global warming. “Sandy was terrible, but we're currently in a relative hurricane 'drought'.” But that doesn’t stop politicians from trying to make political hay from them.

Much of the gum bumping about "global warming" may be attributed to the political aspirations of Al Gore who hoped to ride an environmental white horse into the White House. It all comes down to a politically-motivated overreaction to a 0.35 degree C increase in globally-averaged temperatures in the period from 1978-1997. Since 1998, as Mr. Hart correctly points out, temperatures have flat-lined or declined. What this amounted to was a hyperbolic response to a temporary and cyclical climate phenomenon, which has been replicated a myriad of times in human history.

The climate history of the 20th century, by itself, contradicts the CO2 equals warming hypothesis. From 1913-1945, CO2 was not a factor and temperatures rose slightly. And from 1945-1977, temperatures fell in the face of rising CO2. It was only in the period from 1978-1997 that temperatures and CO2 rose simultaneously. But since CO2 is likely to continue to rise for the foreseeable future, we will have periods of both rising and falling temperatures in the face of rising CO2.

The scientific travesty is that many politicians are trying to transform CO2 into a “pollutant” requiring draconian federal regulations whose only effect will be to stifle economic growth. CO2 is a harmless trace element constituting just 0.039 per cent of the earth's atmosphere (390 parts per million by volume). It's what humans and animals exhale and its presence helps plant production. 500 million years ago, CO was 20 times more prevalent in our atmosphere. The aim is to convince the uninformed that carbon dioxide is the equivalent of carbon monoxide, a highly toxic gas.

With time and historical perspective, the global warming crisis will turn out to be the greatest scientific fraud in history. But that won’t politicians from exploiting it in the short term. Obama has already wasted billions trying to fix a non-problem.
And now he’s even orchestrating the mindless followers of a new secular religion to march on the Mall to advance this silly agenda.

Vi Hart: Reel

siftbot

says...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'vi hart, doodling, math, epic' to 'vi hart, doodling, math, epic, poetry, poem, unreal, number' - edited by messenger

How To Make A Baby

charliem says...

....Pro Hart?

Dragon Curve - Numberphile

messenger

says...

SuperWickedCool. I'm surprised Vi Hart didn't get a hold of this first.

day
night

Comment of the Moment

Michael Cohen LIED AGAIN in TRUMP TRIAL says Ex-Lawyer » newtboy said... “You think he’s capable of coming up with an answer himself? After all these years? I think it’s crystal clear bob can’t think for himself and cannot ever give an answer to any question he’s not…” read more

Submit videos easily with the VideoSift Bookmarklet!

Beggar's Canyon

Videos from the submitter's Personal Queue *begging for a little of your attention...

Visit Beggar's Canyon »

VideoSift

/Learn

5.0

search results matching tag: `hart`

Doodling in Math Class: Dragon Dungeons

Outtakes From The Lyft Remote

Outtakes From The Lyft Remote

YouTube Rewind 2013: What Does 2013 Say?

Science Vlogger reads her comments

Vi Hart - How To Toothpaste

blahpook (Member Profile)

Vi Hart - How To Toothpaste

Thug Cop Smashes Woman's Face Over DUI

messenger (Member Profile)

Lesbian Woman Answers Question About Being a Butch

noam chomsky-how climate change became a liberal hoax

Vi Hart: Reel

How To Make A Baby

Dragon Curve - Numberphile

Send this Article to a Friend

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon

search results matching tag: hart

blahpook (Member Profile)

messenger (Member Profile)

Member Login

Sign Up

Account Recovery

search results matching tag: `hart`