Well, Dr. Evil's got the stiff arm movements down pat.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Dr Evil, Austin Powers, Sea Bass, Lasers, Sharks' to 'Dr Evil, Austin Powers, Sea Bass, Lasers, Sharks, mike myers, robert wagner' - edited by my15minutes

Reminded me of Dr. Evil with the phallic nuke -> ground insertion.

DAH! What about Dr. Evil?!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'austin, powers, mike, myers, dr, evil, shadadelic, michael, cane, shat, on, turtle, as, ya, do' to 'austin, powers, mike, myers, dr, evil, shagadelic, michael, cane, shat, on, turtle, as, ya, do' - edited by calvados

Upvote for ~2:30... DR. EVIL MOMENT!!!!!! NICE WORK!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Dr Evil Austin Powers Sea Bass Lasers Sharks' to 'Dr Evil, Austin Powers, Sea Bass, Lasers, Sharks' - edited by darkrowan

Supporting Point #5:
Dr. Evil is her Stage Lover.

awesome

Just checked out that link, Gorgon. Dr. Evil pops into mind

I had thought that this would be a collection of examples of the OTHER slow clap: the sarcastic slow clap.

e.g. Bond has escaped from the laser table, fought his way through the shark tank, draws the gun hidden in his sock, and shoots the evil mastermind -- but it's empty! Cue Dr. Evil's slow echoing clap. "Very impressive Mr. Bond. Did you honestly think I didn't know about your little toy? I disarmed it while you were unconscious!"

He even has the Dr. Evil laugh down.

nice sift! I've always maintained that the best characters in the Austin Powers films are Dr Evil and his demented cadre of villains.

I hope that GooTube fights it all the way, though I feel certain that they will angle for a settlement with restored access rights to Viacom's shit (Joost be damned).

The issue is secondary markets. Viacom would have a clear winner if they were suing only for infringement of stuff like the full episodes of 24 on YouTube before primary distribution. However, Viacom's rights to control of secondary and tertiary distribution outlets and, more importantly, secondary distribution of excerpts are much closer legal issues. It would be interesting to see GooTube pursue 'fair use' arguments in this case (not too sure that it is a fair use under the current laws).

Distribution is $$ and control. And right now, GooTube is positioned best for profiting from secondary and tertiary distribution. I can see why Viacom is bringing the Dr. Evil suit, but I don't agree with a single word of their argument.