Here's hoping a double-decker bus doesn't go along that road at the wrong time!

Dupe of http://videosift.com/video/London-Double-Decker-Bus-Does-Push-Ups ?

I live up the road from a railway bridge with a clearance of 12ft. Not quite a crash a month, but everytime a Double Decker bus tried to take a shortcut it would lose its roof. Fortunately they never had passengers. We also had a Skip Truck tip itself over on the bridge and a 18 Wheeler rip its top off.

Oh, and whenever it rained too hard it flooded under the bridge and you'd always get a couple of people that didnt think the puddle was too deep. They didn't always make it across.

"If a double-decker bus, crashes into us.... to die by your side, is such a heavenly way to die.
If a ten ton truck, kills the both of us... to die by your side, well, the pleasure and the privilege is mine."

Some of my favorite lyrics of all time. *dark

My frame of reference is limited to few cities with trains, but it seems there wouldn't be enough space on the top rail's car to accommodate the demand, unless the entire train is line double decker bus style. Also since most trains travel to and from centralized locations it seems as if it would create a bottle neck of sorts of passengers trying to in and out of the car quickly enough. Also what about trains the run on the same track. It seems this design would have almost no effect except expanding the space already allotted to train tracks.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'the smiths, morrisey, music' to 'the smiths, morrisey, music, double decker bus' - edited by calvados

I probably will not vote for Hillary, one main reason is that she couldn't stand up to her own husband, i see that as weakness. It matters not if she stood up to him in private, she should have stood to in public. It is wrong to pursue power, but in that case she had a perfect chance to get some pride for strong women. Staying with a cheating man? How does that show strength, "I love him?" once a cheater always a cheater.

Ladies, Gentleman for president, i have no preference, what i would like is a person to run that has been in a war, and has seen true horrors. Not some prissy ass boat captain, or some crack addict pilot. I good old fashioned infantry man or woman (im for integrated military), because they know what wars can be, and how wasteful they are. I want some one who has seen the sh*t, and knows what its like to see their fellow soldier get blown to shreds.

Then i think these useless wars would stop, because why the hell are we fighting in somebody else's desert? Because they attacked us? England gets more terror attacks by the IRA then we could ever fathom, to them it could be a normal thing. I saw after the (i believe it was the parliament building)bombing on a double decker bus a barkeeper he said basically "This is normal, the IRA attacks all the time. We have gotten used to this." I'm not condoning complacency, I'm stating that when you wake up in the morning, your life could be over in an instant.

So in short, any one is better than bush, I vote for no useless war. Who ever gets our boys out of that sh*t hole i will vote for.

Men are wasted trying to fight Vietnam wars, whether in a desert or in a jungle.

Great moment in history it is. Hopefully these candidates will stand up for what they believe, and not become a shadow of what they stood for.