search results matching tag: cutting people off
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.006 seconds
- 1
Videos (3) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (2) | Comments (14) |
- 1
Videos (3) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (2) | Comments (14) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Bangladeshi bus driver skills
Flashbacks to Nepali taxi drivers. They'll dip out straight into oncoming traffic at full speed and then cut people off at the last second to get back into their lane. A local friend told me the traffic law is, don't hit anybody.
Yogi (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.
Road rage in Brazil
>> ^Yogi:
>> ^Stingray:
She was probably pissed that he was trying to squeeze through, but I do believe that is allowed in some areas/countries.
I see motorcycle cops do it all the time, so my dad always does it. One time he squeezed through didn't touch anyone and some guy went F'n Ballistic. Yelling and screaming at him how he can't do that, how dare he.
On another note the camera seems to be rather smooth at the end, like it's not registering footsteps.
Also Road Rage is all the Rage http://videosift.com/video/Persistent-attacker-taken-for-a-ride
I actually got into a debate about this subject with someone I was at a new hire sort of event. This lady was talking about motorcycles and how she was really upset when riders do this and that's why nobody should be allowed to motorcycle.
I asked her if she thinks this guy only rides a motorcycle or if he has a car for when it rains or snows or whatever. She replied that she thinks he probably does. I asked her "Are you seriously going to tell me that when this guy is not driving his car instead of riding his bike he's not weaving in and out of traffic and cutting people off" She agreed
Since we can't stop idiots from driving like idiots I think we should allow them to ride motorcycles like this because there is a much greater risk to them than to others.
Shit Yogis Say
You're mad and I'm not...I guess I win! -Yogi
http://videosift.com/video/Louis-CK-Cutting-People-Off-Sex
Louis CK - Cutting People Off & Sex
Tags for this video have been changed from 'Louis, CK, cutting people off, traffic, sex, angry, hate, one woman, zero women, no sex' to 'Louis CK, cutting people off, traffic, sex, angry, hate, one woman, zero women, no sex' - edited by xxovercastxx
Ron Paul: I Would Not Have Voted For The Civil Rights Act
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qojv1bR-S0
That was quite the wall of text just for that quip.
Thanks for pointing that out. I think I mentioned that though so it makes your statement kind of insulting.
I think Paul would be better than Bush, but far, far worse than Obama. You want to blame Obama for Gitmo, apparently, but you obviously haven't cared about the topic enough to actually follow the sequence of events. Congress passed a law barring Obama from bringing the detainees onto American soil, and before that New York City opposed bringing KSM to trial there because of security concerns. I think anyone who thinks Ron Paul is somehow going to overcome those obstacles is deluding themselves.
Apparently, you are wrong about my lack of care in this particular topic. Do not generalize. Congress did pass the law, and so? They passed it, if I am correct, in 2009? So he did close it in 2008 when he had a chance? No he did not. And who cares what New York City opposed? Many states opposed blacks being integrated with whites in public schools too—and we know where that went...
I don’t think Paul can overcome the obstacles that Obama has allowed in terms of Gitmo. However, there are ways, one would be leverage. But there are plenty more.
Would the Republican party line up and vote for legislation that would let the detainees come here for Federal trials if Paul tells them to? I doubt it.
Republicans would absolutely not line up behind Ron Paul for this or most other matters. In fact, they would go against nearly every policy he tries because they are corporate hacks and they hate a truly “free” market. Corporations enjoy too many hand outs, too many protections that our government gives them… Just look at how the Republican party speak out Paul...even while pretending to emulate him.
Would Paul make Gitmo his #1 priority? I doubt it.
#1? Maybe not. And? Second or third is fine. However, pointing against your suggestion that he would not give it his best to remove this unconstitutional bullshit, he has been major in his stand on habeas corpus…
Would Paul try to repeal the Civil Rights Act? I bet he wouldn't veto a repeal if Congress passed it...
And? Congress and the House would not have the votes for a repeal, so, like I said, this is a straw-man issue we have…
Would Paul try to repeal Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and health care reform? You betcha! Priority #1, even.
Um, now who doesn’t know what they are talking about? First, Paul stated that he would not, because it was infeasible (Social security and Medicare/Medicaid.) He said he would allow opt outs, and that we would need to fulfill our obligations to those who have already been promised their dues, somehow, to those currently in the program. Just watch the video I posted a link too.
Would Paul get impeached if he tried to rapidly withdraw our troops from everywhere, and then slash the military budget? Almost certainly.
I would be honored to be impeached for doing the right thing. Since when do people only do the right thing when it is easy? That's not the right thing, that convenient. And, actually, the clamor from most republicans citizens (Even those at the VFW I go to) is to cut the military (To a significant degree) because we are in a serious financial crisis. They also, with the actions in Libya and around, wonder if we can sustain our empire. A year ago, you would have been 100% right. We must admit, most Americans want our troops home, even from Iraq and Af-gan.
For the record, I totally agreed with what heropsycho said (the comment you said was 100% right). Paul and libertarians refuse to accept the good things that government regulation has provided us, and dismiss (and decry as EVIL!) the idea that any new good could come from new regulation.
Agreed. Just make sure to note that certain people (Me and others) agree that some regulations need to be a federal issue.
Worse, they want to dismantle all the good, and absolutely forestall any more progress being made in this country on any major issue. Maybe he'd impotently try to deal with the war and associated civil liberties issues, but I doubt he'd even bother when there's still a New Deal to repeal.
He cares about bankruptcy first.
"If we made common sense about this yes I would cut all this militarism and not cut people off from medical care."
I don't see a problem with this. And his view that the dollar will go, some say is doomsday...and so they said that about the levies, and so they said that about 9/11, and so they say it till it happens.
Muslim school of love and tolerance
>> ^Yogi:
Up until just after the 1960's children in our schools were taught that it's a wonderful thing that we massacre'd the Native Population. There was even a little boy in a cartoon telling everyone how he wishes he was there killing them when they would wait to the men went out hunting and massacre the women and children.
Also in the 60's there was an exhibit in a museum where children could play on a Blackhawk helicopter and fire on a Vietnamese village.
I'm not saying this isn't a good video I upvoted it...I'm just pointing out that we should look in the fucking mirror. QM I'm looking at you.
It's great, and it's necessary, that people in all cultures are capable of being self-aware, but I don't think it's at all important or relevant to what's being taught, and done, in Islamic schools in The United Kingdom. Say what you want about the UK - its faults are many - but it's not a 13th century culture. What's being demonstrated here is repulsive and poisonous, and not enough people are taking this seriously.*
Yeah, we've messed up. America's messed up pretty bad and Europe in general has a horrible track record. When you're in the road and the car is coming, don't pause to contemplate all those times you cut people off in your ridiculous SUV. Fucking move.
*(not enough people are taking this seriously who aren't paranoid, xenophobic racists who can't compute 2 plus 2 without thinking there's a brown man under the bed)
Louis CK to the Other Driver - "Fuck em"
Ok Mike. It's getting pretty bad when you dupe yourself.
Louis CK - Cutting People Off & Sex
>> ^KnivesOut:
Imho, he's the best comedian alive. Just my humble opinion, of course.
I keep on trying to re-upvote your comment. It's a long clip and I tend to scroll down in the middle of long ones. Go to click, it's already grey, 4 times I believe. No doubt, one of the funniest people alive.
MikesHL13 (Member Profile)
Your video, Louis CK - Cutting People Off & Sex, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
Louis CK - Cutting People Off & Sex
>> ^Throbbin:
That traffic bit actually pissed me off -
You're mad and I'm not...I guess I win!
Louis CK - Cutting People Off & Sex
Tags for this video have been changed from 'Louis, CK, cutting people off, traffic, sex, angry, hate, one women, no sex' to 'Louis, CK, cutting people off, traffic, sex, angry, hate, one woman, zero women, no sex' - edited by calvados
The Four Horsemen. Dawkins,Dennett,Harris, Hitchens. Part 2
Hitchens, please, stop cutting people off.
John Stossel is a Douche Bag (Politics Talk Post)
I agree with the political tag, but seriously the man is just a douche bag.
He cuts people off when he interviews them. His reporting is intended to be inflammatory and one-sided. He is a douche bag.