>> ^Thylan:
Easy? Yes.
Why? Is unexplained.
The why might be NSFW.


I'm almost certain this is BDSM related, i don't get the dodgy music, and i can think of several ways to leave the device, but if it was a site explaining cheap or home-made methods then i guess those 2 things would not seem out of the ordinary.

Of course, just because it's BDSM related doesn't mean that it's NSFW, there's no nudity, there's no swearing, it's just an alternate expression of sexuality (probably). Might as well call a guy going to buy condoms NSFW, or a woman in a store buying some lingerie NSFW.

In fact, it's tamer than both of those scenarios.

*promote

The music video for "Pagan Poetry", directed by Nick Knight, which as stated on its making of page "is about a woman preparing herself for marriage and for her lover". It was also one of Björk's most controversial. It featured Björk in a dress designed by Alexander McQueen, covering only the lower portion of her body. The upper portion of the dress seems to be pearls laced through her skin. The video also included heavily distorted, close-up sequences of Björk and her partner Matthew Barney engaging in sexual intercourse and fellatio, which were shot by Björk per request of the director. The video also features a graphic display of body piercing, including a corset piercing on a model's back.

wow, kudos for singing so well in a corset.

But can't you see that you were totally asking for it? You try to correct somebody else, I correct you. Funny, huh?

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
I miss one error and you jump all over me...

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
I know. I'm just messin' with ya. But, seriously, don't flame people for their semantics unless you do it right. Short notice my old lady's corset cover! *rolls eyes*

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
True... Hey, hey I said he needed an editor. And it was short notice.

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
>> ^MycroftHomlz:
He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:
That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.
Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...


If you're going to be all stuck-up and edit other people's stuff, you can at least correct "your welcome."

It's YOU'RE welcome! YOU'RE! It's a contraction. YOU ARE=YOU'RE! Get it right.

*wink* @ Grinter. Semantics flame fest. Yay!

I miss one error and you jump all over me...

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
I know. I'm just messin' with ya. But, seriously, don't flame people for their semantics unless you do it right. Short notice my old lady's corset cover! *rolls eyes*

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
True... Hey, hey I said he needed an editor. And it was short notice.

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
>> ^MycroftHomlz:
He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:
That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.
Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...


If you're going to be all stuck-up and edit other people's stuff, you can at least correct "your welcome."

It's YOU'RE welcome! YOU'RE! It's a contraction. YOU ARE=YOU'RE! Get it right.

*wink* @ Grinter. Semantics flame fest. Yay!

I know. I'm just messin' with ya. But, seriously, don't flame people for their semantics unless you do it right. Short notice my old lady's corset cover! *rolls eyes*

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
True... Hey, hey I said he needed an editor. And it was short notice.

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
>> ^MycroftHomlz:
He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:
That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.
Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...


If you're going to be all stuck-up and edit other people's stuff, you can at least correct "your welcome."

It's YOU'RE welcome! YOU'RE! It's a contraction. YOU ARE=YOU'RE! Get it right.

*wink* @ Grinter. Semantics flame fest. Yay!

It would be one thing if this was a video of nubile coeds cavorting in wet t-shirt contests. The amount of skill involved in this performance makes it a performance. How many times did she have to run through that to be able to do it that seamlessly. I think her corset must have 30 eye hooks. She also has her timing down beautiful. She struts, strikes a pose holds it, and then on beat struts elsewhere on the stage.

At any rate I would agree that it is approaching the edge of decency, if decency is defined by what most suburban god fearing Americans find tolerable.

Well I agree with you about the statement on day long discomfort, some types of lingerie are definitely not something I would wear for more than a few hours or if I were going to go about an average work day, that is definitely a cotton panties, no underwire kind of get up, but like you said, generally this kind of stuff is not on for that long.

However, what choggie says about the sensation of restriction feeling pleasant for some women, I do have to agree, and I will freely admit that I do love the feel of a well made corset, for up to several hours or more, same goes with garter belts and such... don't get me wrong, I'm glad we no longer live in a society where that is the standard uniform, but it is nice to play and indulge now and again... call me a freak, I don't know, its what turns me on, everyone is different, hence the wide and wonderful range of apparel available to people... also, another way I look at it, is that there are things far stranger out there... I mean, there are some folks who like to be spanked while wearing full body latex and gas masks, I'm not one of them, but if that's their bag, then go for it!

My goodness. Can't believe we actually have to DEFEND evolution...

By now (now as in modern living with heat-proof spatulas, extra absorbent paper towels, pools with chlorine, electric powered lawn-mowers etc etc) I would've thought scientific teachings would be a common knowledge.

But apparently we still live in 19th century and appalled by the idea that we're somehow related to apes. In fact, why don't we revert everything back to the 19th century?

Forget the sports bras, make women dress up in corsets and layers upon layers of clothing to hide all their skin except the hands and face! (European hijab!), throw away the modern medicine and surgical technology and go back to the good ol' leeches and skull-crackin' iron tools with questionable sanitation.

Ehbolooshun? Bahumbug! That Darwin boy sure is a tardy old fool!

Man related to Monkeys? The nerve! *scoffs*

A more realistic game would be a hand holding a cellphone to trigger the corset of dynamite in a crowd of civilians. Muslim fanatics bomb more than Pauly Shore doing a set at a Mensa meeting.

Been tryin’ to tell folks for years that that fucker wore a corset!!You think these animators dinna’ spend a buncha’ time hittin’ the opium, thank again….Max was a tripper, and Betty Boop was Popeye’s bitch!!! Imagine That!! He only hit it with Olive all that time 'cause they were relatives, and 'cause Bluto, was a no good, low down, misogynatin' cocksucker.....

yes, this is the rev. manson's wife... who also loves the wardrobe, corsets and fishnets included.

But yes, she is a better role model for women body-image wise... and really chogs, she doesn't have what I would term 'big brestesees'... she's no silicon injected bimbo anyway... der dita is au naturale!