search results matching tag: bonker

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (15)     Sift Talk (1)     Blogs (0)     Comments (90)   

Children Who Kill!! - (Watch FULLSCREEN)

Harry likes the tv

Speculum.

How to make Chinese Candy Dragon

Optical Illusions are fun!

Maze says...

I think you have to "relax" your eyes.. or go cross-eyed. Or try looking "through" the video.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

That's really odd, this one didn't work for me at all. I think it has to do with the shading on the top...or I am going flat out bonkers.

Optical Illusions are fun!

Deadly E. coli was engineered?

DerHasisttot says...

>> ^Lawdeedaw:

>> ^DerHasisttot:
?????? This guy seems quite bonkers. The more he talks the more idiotic he gets. He's just grabbing stuff out of thin air.

Even so--it could be an accident nevertheless. Releasing something on accident is just a part of medicine. And it did not have to be a "bio weapons" center... It could just be human ere.


It was traced back to a bean-sprout producer in Egypt. This dude should not be on Tv spreading bullshit outrageous theories.

Deadly E. coli was engineered?

Lawdeedaw says...

>> ^DerHasisttot:
?????? This guy seems quite bonkers. The more he talks the more idiotic he gets. He's just grabbing stuff out of thin air.


Even so--it could be an accident nevertheless. Releasing something on accident is just a part of medicine. And it did not have to be a "bio weapons" center... It could just be human ere.

Henry 8.0 - VIII for Vendetta

alien_concept says...

>> ^DerHasisttot:

Instant upvote for Blessed. I envy that man.


There was this episode of QI, I haven't managed to find it yet, where they did a whole bit on him. Absolutely fascinating dude, completely fucking bonkers, has broken records climbing mountains, has 2000 creatures living in his house. He's one of my heroes for sure!

Christopher Hitchens on why he works against Religions

cosmovitelli says...

Jesus and Robin Hood and Socrates, and any other popular figures from more than a couple of centuries ago, have their existence/non existence blurred with legends, stories and all sorts of stupid demented bullshit to the point where no one really knows what the story is. Anyone who claims to is lying.

You take the good stuff and kind of hope they were like that. Christianity is the selective filtering of some ancient stories from an uneducated diseased fearful superstitious population of people who rarely lived past 35, warped to suit the morality and power structure of a succession of morally dubious civilisations in which the ones with the big hats claiming to know more about what 'god' thinks are invariably FAR more like the self righteous fat ruling class who had Jeebs nailed up. If that actually happened. I mean , if Jeebs was real enough to drive a nail through - they certainly nailed up thousands in that time.

I mean what about the pope/nuns/monks/water into wine etc etc? That's not in the bible. People add, and remove, whatever they want to suit their purpose. They don't seem to be afraid of retribution for it, so either they have a HUGE ego (god will agree with me!) or they don't really believe in any of that shit. The pope sure as hell doesn't, or he'd clean up the Vatican bank sharpish.

Shiny may be bonkers but at least he's not wearing a silly hat in a golden city tricked from the poor and desperate, shouting at Africans that the fantasy god he has violently imposed on them will hate them for using Jonnies to stop Aids.



>> ^hpqp:

Well considering that the Jeebs is probably a fictional character altogether , it's not surprising that there is differences between the ways different authors imagined him to be.

Oslo Bomber and Utoya Shooter's Manifest

DerHasisttot says...

Ugh. Ok:



Population group A has a lower than replacement level reproduction rate.
Population group B has a higher than replacement level reproduction rate and benefits from an unlimited external source of replenishment.
The outcome is that over time, group A will cease to exist.
As it happens, some individuals in group A may be displeased about their upcoming extinction.



Human beings of whatever colour of skin can make babies with one another. Therefore: AB+A+B , not either A or B. This is not how it works. Also your group B cannot have unlimited external source of replenishment. Even with a huge outside source of replenishment, it will all work out as a nice intercultural mix, as it is right now: the letters we use are latin, the numerals arabic. Cultures are all already mixed.
It is not "us" versus "them", It is "us" with "them." What your ideological fear of a "civilisation going extinct" implies, is that you are a racist. Maybe just a cultural racist, but a racist nonetheless. Now to the really stupid stuff:

Unlike most media sources who immediately suspected Muslim involvement, I waited for more facts to emerge before making assumptions. That is not the action of a "racist" as you would define one.

Very good, had nothing to do with why I called you a racist, and you are right, it would not be a reason to call you a racist. But it does not negate your racist comments of basically agreeing with a mass-murderer that Muslims, or group B as you like to call them, will end our "civilisation."


My admission is that his reasoning is sound, his concerns legitimate and his motivations worthy of study.

His reasoning is not sound, his concerns are bonkers and his motivation is worthy of study for psychiatrists. If you like, present one of his mad theories you agree with and watch it being ripped apart by every kind of reasonable person (non-fascists and non-racists) there is. Now for the best bit:

As for DerHasisttot's logical pretzel. I'm sure he is the type of fellow that would mobilize government in defense of an endangered species of duck, but yet finds the mild concept that a civilization wishes to maintain its existence is morally wrong. Shame on him.


Let's reverse the roles ad absurdum and relish in the brilliant irony of your preface "logical pretzel": "I'm sure pprt is the type of person X, who would rather Z than Y! Shame on him!." So, you assume I am a specific type of person, assume how I would act in a certain situation, then assume how I would act in a different type of situation that goes against your ideology; and you follow with the (in your mind logical) conclusion that shame should be thrust upon me. Dude, you are shaming your own fiction.

But: Yes I would ask the nature conservatory of my government to protect an endangered species. The second part of your assumptional assault is of course: bonkers. I do not think it is ethnically wrong for anyone to remain alive. And I am not against museums, where one can look at relics of previous "civilisations." But: Cultures are in flux. Cultures are NOT static. Even North Korean culture cannot resist every western influence. In 200 years, no culture we know today will still exist. They will not have been killed by muslims like you want to believe in your racist mind. They will just evolve, move on, adapt and MIX. Every culture is mixed and NOT a homogenous entity.

Deadly E. coli was engineered?

Deadly E. coli was engineered?

Gary Busey endorses and defines Donald Trump

Tracy Morgan on Conan or Trying to Interview Someone Stoned



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon