Whom can I stab in the face so that this song will never surface again?

translated, poorly:

it's a rhyme, no sense here)
Druff means high / on drugs
slang for high/ on drugs
druff again

2x

let's go, 3 days awake
next party eventually, 3 days awake
Afterhour before the hour, 3 days awake
3 days awake, now you're getting weak

full power take it, 3 days away
breaded and ding dong ding dong, 3 days awake
colorful pills party, 3 days awake
pulse like a rocket, 3 days awake

impossible to translate, 3 days awake
you were here yesterday, too, 3 days awake
Mirror on the wall, who is 3 days awake?
You and your grandma are 3 days awake

nose is full, dick is shrinking, 3 days awake
eating dumb, sleeping dumb, 3 days awake
bananas in the braiiins, 3 days awake
I DONT KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS, 3 days awake

(eyes like) plates to the jaw, 3 days awake
ants in the pants, 3 days awake
bottle empty, fire engine, 3 days awake
can't run anymore, 3 days awake

2nd verse again

emergency farmacy, 3 days awake
gunk on the wallpaper, 3 days awake
on drugs, high, 3 days awake
absolutely no worries, 3 days awake

2x first verse

Now leave me alone please. I have to think about life decisions.

>> ^Darkhand:


Pork that's the problem though even your own article says "I have my doubts, I don't see how" but we don't know all the facts.
This law should not be under scrutiny until it's actually used and if it actually gets zimmerman off.
And the problem with your Theory about Martin being able to continuously pummel Zimmerman while he is on the ground is not true. Once Zimmerman is on his back the "Perceived Threat" is neutralized. It works the same way here in jersey with self defense but I can't use a gun. I answer force with equal force. Once my opponent is disabled I can't keep wailing on them.
Being stalked, in my opinion, does not allow you to feel like your life is in danger. Martin used his cellphone to text his girlfriend, why didn't he call the cops and try to get help?
But then again I'm not a lawyer OR a judge and nobody else is. So everything I say here could be wrong. We don't have all the facts so anyone claiming to know EXACTLY what happened is wrong.
It's just funny because it seems to me that liberals are siding with Martin and Conservatives and siding with Zimmerman. Everyone seems to have their own set of "Facts" and nobody is willing to believe that their own side (Liberal Media or Conservative Media) is injecting facts that may or may not be 100% credible into the case.
Everyone seems to be using this case as a means to push their own policy whether it's gun control reform, minority rights, or personal security. Everyone seems to just be ignoring the tragedy that some kid has had the rest of his life taken from him. Because really that's all we do know!


If you don't have any doubts given that the police didn't tox screen Zimmerman, Zimmerman was told not to follow, they had the wrong detective doing the investigation, and witnesses were coming forward weeks AFTER the incident to try to tell their side of it and saying police never investigated. Then I don't think you can call yourself objective.

I personally try to put myself in either person's shoes and decide if I think I would have acted the same way. I can see Trayvon's point of view more easily than I can Zimmerman. If I were a teenager visiting my father and someone in his neighborhood was following me, I would definitely try to run. And if they kept pursuing and had me trapped, you have the choice of letting them do whatever or fighting back. That part is going to vary on what is being said, but I think Zimmerman acted as aggressor there.

Now in Zimmerman's shoes, I don't own a gun, in fact I've never even held one or fired one. However, if I did have a gun, I certainly would not get so close to someone as for them to take my gun from me or prevent me from using my gun if I felt they were "suspicious". I also would not have gotten out of my vehicle to make that even more likely to occur. As for following a teenager, if they looked like a teen in physical appearance I wouldn't push the issue. If it were an adult acting like that, I might be concerned enough to try to keep them in view from a block away or something. I certainly would never have gotten out of my vehicle in either case of a non-injured teen or adult...they obviously don't want you to be near them if they RUN.

The SYG law, which I have quoted the relevant portions in a previous quote does not say that someone is neutralized when they are on their back. Reposting a portion of it:

2011 Florida Statutes CHAPTER 776 JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE[14]

776.012 Use of force in defense of person.—A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:

(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.

If Trayvon could reasonably believe he was in imminent threat of death or great bodily harm the law clearly says he could use lethal force against Zimmerman. Given that Zimmerman was awake throughout and had the ability to draw a gun and shoot, he was not neutralized. Trayvon was within his rights to defend himself by beating Zimmerman to death if he reasonably felt his life was in danger. If Zimmerman said he had a gun, or the gun was detectable through clothing, or brandishing it, that's a clear indicator that Zimmerman had the ability to use lethal force against him.

Martin wasn't texting his girlfriend, he was speaking to her according to her testimony. She says the line went dead after she HEARD them ask questions and then shoving began.

As for stalking, people get restraining orders against stalkers all the time. If it wasn't a presentation of danger, the courts would not hand out these restraining orders against people who do such things.

I don't like labeling myself as liberal or conservative. Perhaps my life experience makes me favor Martin, but I think the presentation of information thus far indicates that in the moment Zimmerman was beyond the "norm" for behavior for an adult non-LEO against another civilian who was young if not underage. That's not even counting the confrontation, he went beyond the scope a normal citizen would prior to it. Whether that was because he "on something", "pissed", "racist", or had some other agenda.....we can't know. I think it's clear evidence of him not thinking acting reasonably or thinking clearly.

And I don't feel that I'm pushing an agenda. I'm applying the language of the law to the scenario, and I feel that Zimmerman violated Martin's rights and was let go because of the law that should have applied first and foremost to Martin who was actively trying to escape Zimmerman by Zimmerman's own admissions on the 911 tapes. The rest of the police screw ups is just fuel to the fire. It doesn't even matter if Zimmerman hated blacks at this point, although it will be important once they finally apply the law in some kind of rational way. To determine if this was a hate crime on his part, which will be left up to a jury.

Again, I can absolutely see why people would be upset on this case for a lot of reasons. But by far the most troubling is that it seems like you can put someone on the defensive, and straight up murder them as soon as they have lost all other options of flight and turn to fight. Not seeing that aspect of it, is by far the most troubling "blindness"/willful ignorance of the people coming out on the side of Zimmerman. Without evidence to show that Trayvon had a chance for escape, Zimmerman is 100% wrong in the wording of the law under 776.041 as the aggressor. If we can't apply the law by it's language, it's a useless law.

I couldn't get into Awake and Mad Men pilots. Too boring for my taste. Also, Touch as well. I probably won't like Downton Abbey either.

I'm with you on Awake. The psychological aspect is a really great concept, but it's not enough to carry the show because after the first episode it's just matter-of-fact. It also gets a bit stale when you realize every episode is following the same recipe and we'll never make any progress into what's really going on with him.

Plus, the writers pulled a weird move by essentially proving that one of his dream worlds is reality by showing some nefarious characters having a private meeting (without the dreamer's knowledge, mind you) and discussing things of which the dreamer has no knowledge.

I think I'd like it more if they just proved that they are not dreams and that he's really awakening into a full-fledged alternate universe every time he opens his eyes.

Aside from Awake, I just finished Boardwalk Empire and Game of Thrones. Both are spectacular and I highly recommend them.

>> ^Opus_Moderandi:

Try 2 pots instead...>> ^NaMeCaF:
I don't get it. I must be weird or something, Coffee doesn't have this effect on me at all.
I just drink it because I like the taste, but even after 2 cups at night, I sleep fine.



Yeah, if the caffeine won't keep you awake at that point, the constant spray of shit is bound to keep you toilet bound for the night.

^
Yeah and I dont care what colour it's painted that spider still keeps me awake at night

I took part in a pain med experiment and whatever they tested on me was dreamy; no pain and coming to was delightful with a dentist from Jamaica whose accent made everything especially irey.

My brother, on the other hand, must have got the placebo because he was 100% awake when the dentist put his knee to my brother's chest to really yank those suckers out. Poor guy...

The bullsh1t is so deep around here I thought you'd appreciate skipping the smell test and getting right to it.

So here's to hoping enough people are awake enough not to get fooled again by The One (and Done).

>> ^VoodooV:

Way to continue your long tradition of reasoned, arguments with no ad-hom attacks @quantumushroom.
nope, no trolling here. We're lucky you're here spreading your pearls of wisdom instead of spending your valuable time at more reputable websites like...Conservapedia.

When I had my teeth out, I apparently was resistant to the general anesthetic they used. I made it through the entire "Count down from 10" and my dentist didn't know what to do, so he had me start counting back up again.

Eventually I was knocked out though, but when I woke up, much like @PHJF, I was completely aware of everything. Wasn't loopy in the least. They figured I was bluffing, so they helped me down a hallway to a room where I was supposed to "Wake Up". (Probably helped me so I couldn't sue if I fell.) And then proceeded to leave me there looking at a wall for 15 minutes before anybody checked up on me again.

When they came in the second time they said "Are you awake now?" In a bubbly voice, to which I very flatly replied "Just as awake as I was 15 minutes ago, thanks." Felt bad about that later, but ffs, I was fine.

Unfortunately, my surgery didn't go as well as others. My mouth was very swollen (all 4 out) and the painkillers they gave me afterward didn't do anything except for make me drowsy. So, in a sense, they worked when I was sleeping, but I was in excruciating pain while I was still awake, finally had to get better painkillers.

Tl;Dr, The whole operation sucks.

>> ^Reefie:

>> ^ant:
I can't type fast and very loud right now since it 4:48 AM PST. I will try this later when people are awake. Or better do it at work to drive my colleagues (mostly women) crazy since they hate my loud typings. You can read and vote about it in http://aqfl.net/node/5825 ... <IMG class=smiley src="http://videosift.com/cdm/emoticon/frown.gif"> One of my college friends said I type like a machine gun. Funny, I don't even use model M keyboards. <IMG class=smiley src="http://videosift.com/cdm/emoticon/tongue.gif">

Hah, was having a laugh with a guy at work about how we're both loud typists - the rest of the developers are so careful with their keyboards but we're like jackhammers with ours!


Totally. Do you use model M keyboards? I told my colleagues and bosses that I can't work fast if I can't type fast.

>> ^ant:
I can't type fast and very loud right now since it 4:48 AM PST. I will try this later when people are awake. Or better do it at work to drive my colleagues (mostly women) crazy since they hate my loud typings. You can read and vote about it in http://aqfl.net/node/5825 ... <IMG class=smiley src="http://videosift.com/cdm/emoticon/frown.gif"> One of my college friends said I type like a machine gun. Funny, I don't even use model M keyboards. <IMG class=smiley src="http://videosift.com/cdm/emoticon/tongue.gif">


Hah, was having a laugh with a guy at work about how we're both loud typists - the rest of the developers are so careful with their keyboards but we're like jackhammers with ours!

I can't type fast and very loud right now since it 4:48 AM PST. I will try this later when people are awake. Or better, do it at work to drive my colleagues (mostly women) crazy since they hate my loud typings. You can read and vote about it in http://aqfl.net/node/5825 ... One of my college friends said I type like a machine gun. Funny, I don't even use model M keyboards.

>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

As if trying to stay awake while driving wasn't hard enough!


I see what you did there! It made me lol!

Best.
Comment.
Ever.

In reply to this comment by GeeSussFreeK:
As if trying to stay awake while driving wasn't hard enough!

As if trying to stay awake while driving wasn't hard enough!