Rick Sanchez does not seem destroyed; I just turned on CNN and he's still there.

>> ^alizarin:
When they say a health care bill will cost x billion dollars how do they come up with that figure? I'm pretty sure I'm right in my assumption that that figure leaves out the amount not spent privately on health care and insurance and that it leaves out the programs that would automatically be reduced or removed once we had a decent system. So the X billion dollars should be a very big negative number if you're being intellectually honest.


You're essentially dead on. There's no attempt in the CBO reports to gauge the non-government cost impacts of any of the health care bills.

He does mention that it would reduce the deficit, though people like Foxx say that just means it's a "stealth" tax increase.

I also think the costs listed for our wars are lowball ones, and don't include things like veterans benefits, or our basic defense spending that wasn't specifically earmarked for the war. It also doesn't mention that there were no tax increases to pay for the war -- it was pure deficit spending, with no long-run value to the American people that I can discern.

Health care, on the other hand, will be a huge long-run benefit to us, and will reduce our deficit. Seems like win/win/win, even if you insist on looking at it in purely fiscal terms.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Mark Sanchez, NY Jets, Oakland Raiders, NFL, CBS, Hotdog, Wiener, Discrete, Nom' to 'Mark Sanchez, NY Jets, Oakland Raiders, NFL, CBS, Hotdog, Hot Dog, Wiener, Discrete, Nom' - edited by SlipperyPete

Tags for this video have been changed from 'chtv, paris, eiffel, tower, sex, threesome, menage et trois' to 'chtv, paris, eiffel, tower, sex, threesome, menage et trois, dirty sanchez' - edited by ponceleon

>> ^brain:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/19/fox-news-responds-to-
rick_n_292347.html
Not only is he a sucker, but he's a gift that keeps on giving?


In other words, "thanks for the free publicity, Sanchez"

>> ^qualm:
Apparently someone at Fox News said Rick Sanchez is a "sucker." What does that mean? In one sense it's being allowed that "the joke is on you Rick Sanchez and CNN," as per Fox's usual tone of petulance, as if Fox got the best of the kerfuffle. But there's racist code in that word; Hispanics are forever being portrayed and treated as the leeches of AmericanProsperity. The people they used to call "wetbacks" are still thought of as the remoras attached to the otherwise sleek hide of good old USofA.


He's certainly spooky...

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Your video, Rick Sanchez Exposes FOX News Coaching Tea Party Crowd, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

>> ^Drax:
Many Bothan spies died bringing us this footage...


I do not get this reference. I do figure I'd laugh if I did though so... upvote!

thanks for that *promote, it helps in my attempts to take over the front page

p.s. the video below is awesome.

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
*promote

>> ^qualm:
Apparently someone at Fox News said Rick Sanchez is a "sucker." What does that mean? In one sense it's being allowed that "the joke is on you Rick Sanchez and CNN," as per Fox's usual tone of petulance, as if Fox got the best of the kerfuffle. But there's racist code in that word; Hispanics are forever being portrayed and treated as the leeches of AmericanProsperity. The people they used to call "wetbacks" are still thought of as the remoras attached to the otherwise sleek hide of good old USofA.


Damn, qualm! I certainly don't like to defend fox...but you're reaching up your ass for that one. Try again.

>> ^qualm:
Apparently someone at Fox News said Rick Sanchez is a "sucker." What does that mean? In one sense it's being allowed that "the joke is on you Rick Sanchez and CNN," as per Fox's usual tone of petulance, as if Fox got the best of the kerfuffle. But there's racist code in that word; Hispanics are forever being portrayed and treated as the leeches of AmericanProsperity. The people they used to call "wetbacks" are still thought of as the remoras attached to the otherwise sleek hide of good old USofA.


FOX News/The GOP is certainly not above using coded racist terms to fire up the base, but 'sucker'? Gimme a break. When you make these kinds of careless, over-reaching comments, it makes it tougher to confront actual conservative racism.

I cant help but wonder how much more powerful Sanchez uppercut would be if he would use more of his torso and body torque.

Apparently someone at Fox News said Rick Sanchez is a "sucker." What does that mean? In one sense it's being *allowed* that "the joke is on you Rick Sanchez and CNN," as per Fox's usual tone of petulance, as if Fox got the best of the kerfuffle. But there's racist code in that word; Hispanics are forever being portrayed and treated as the leeches of AmericanProsperity. The people they used to call "wetbacks" are still thought of as the remoras attached to the otherwise sleek hide of good old USofA.

Follow-up: http://www.videosift.com/video/Rick-Sanchez-Exposes-FOX-News-Coaching-Tea-Party-Crowd