Your video, How A Street Artist Creates Fake Neon Lights With Spray Pain, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by geo321.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Halloween-Neon-Light-Show-House-Party-Rock-Anthem

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Boise_Lib. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

No worries! Mistakes happen.
And don't worry, it won't discourage me!

Cheers,
Robert

In reply to this comment by Boise_Lib:
I apologize.
I called your video
http://videosift.com/video/This-is-Halloween-Light-Show-Extravaganza a duplicate of this one.
http://videosift.com/video/Halloween-Neon-Light-Show-House-Party-R
ock-Anthem

That was not only wrong--it broke the rules. I was supposed to watch the entire video first. I saw the same house and the same lights and jumped the gun. For example--someone could have edited the same video with a person jumping out and yelling, "Boo!" Even though it would be almost the same--it would not be a dupe.

Again, I apologize.
I hope you don't let this discourage you from continuing to post videos here.

I apologize.
I called your video
http://videosift.com/video/This-is-Halloween-Light-Show-Extravaganza
a duplicate of this one.
http://videosift.com/video/Halloween-Neon-Light-Show-House-Party-Rock-Anthem

That was not only wrong--it broke the rules. I was supposed to watch the entire video first. I saw the same house and the same lights and jumped the gun. For example--someone could have edited the same video with a person jumping out and yelling, "Boo!" Even though it would be almost the same--it would not be a dupe.

Again, I apologize.
I hope you don't let this discourage you from continuing to post videos here.

Sorry, good video but...
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Halloween-Neon-Light-Show-House-Party-Rock-Anthem

>> ^EMPIRE:

it's good to know in this day and age some people still haven't learned how not to waste resources.


Yeah, I wonder how much money to run that. I assume not in CA since it is frakkin' expensive (e.g., $300 per month during the summer in L.A. area for a small house and using AC!).

Crikey, you're on an upsift RAMPAGE, ain't ya? Thanks yet again dude

In reply to this comment by Boise_Lib:
*quality

Tags for this video have been changed from 'australia, neon, lights, city, scape' to 'australia, neon, lights, city, scape, geoff a charters' - edited by kronosposeidon

In reply to this comment by r10k:
<After saying numerous times that I'm not going to attempt a spoon feeding session for people who prefer defending their set opinions ad infinitum, instead of simply reading a book, I'm not sure why that amuses you.



It's amusing because you say that the reason why Terry is wrong is very simple, but you won't give us the reason. Instead of defending your views of the bible, you spend all your effort and energy defending how it's our fault that you're not willing to reason. You tell us the answers are in the New Testament, which we can read for ourselves. Do you mean the parts in the New Testament that teaches masters how they should beat their slaves? Or the parts that tell slaves that they should obey their masters like they obey Christ? Do you selectively ignore these passages when you read the New Testament? Is that how you delude yourself into believing?


Wow, someone's been saving that last sentence for a special day. Terry would be proud.



I know, your own words sound pretty terrible when I throw them back at you eh:

>>"Mentality, your statement about selling daughters off into slavery is a great example of this. I'm mean really, if I have to explain that one to someone, they may as well permanently stamp an idiot tattoo to their forehead, it's so incredibly easy to understand, especially when it's spelt out in the equivalent of bright neon lights throughout the new testament."

After saying numerous times that I'm not going to attempt a spoon feeding session for people who prefer defending their set opinions ad infinitum, instead of simply reading a book, I'm not sure why that amuses you.


It's amusing because you say that the reason why Terry is wrong is very simple, but you won't give us the reason. Instead of defending your views of the bible, you spend all your effort and energy defending how it's our fault that you're not willing to reason. You tell us the answers are in the New Testament, which we can read for ourselves. Do you mean the parts in the New Testament that teaches masters how they should beat their slaves? Or the parts that tell slaves that they should obey their masters like they obey Christ? Do you selectively ignore these passages when you read the New Testament? Is that how you delude yourself into believing?


Wow, someone's been saving that last sentence for a special day. Terry would be proud.



I know, your own words sound pretty terrible when I throw them back at you eh:

>>"Mentality, your statement about selling daughters off into slavery is a great example of this. I'm mean really, if I have to explain that one to someone, they may as well permanently stamp an idiot tattoo to their forehead, it's so incredibly easy to understand, especially when it's spelt out in the equivalent of bright neon lights throughout the new testament."

In reply to this comment by r10k:
Mentality, your statement about selling daughters off into slavery is a great example of this. I'm mean really, if I have to explain that one to someone, they may as well permanently stamp an idiot tattoo to their forehead, it's so incredibly easy to understand, especially when it's spelt out in the equivalent of bright neon lights throughout the new testament.



You're right, it is incredibly easy to understand: the bible is a fake book written by men to reflect the traditions and social mores of that time period. And I totally agree, we should stamp idiot tattoos on the forehead of anyone who doesn't get it.

In reply to this comment by r10k:
Mentality, your statement about selling daughters off into slavery is a great example of this. I'm mean really, if I have to explain that one to someone, they may as well permanently stamp an idiot tattoo to their forehead, it's so incredibly easy to understand, especially when it's spelt out in the equivalent of bright neon lights throughout the new testament.



You're right, it is incredibly easy to understand: the bible is a fake book written by men to reflect the traditions and social mores of that time period. And I totally agree, we should stamp idiot tattoos on the forehead of anyone who doesn't get it.

>> ^r10k:
>> ^mentality:
>> ^spoco2:
Could you expand upon what you think he says here that is clueless about the bible?
Obviously Terry, or anyone else who doesn't believe in god, is clueless because he doesn't know how to properly pick and choose and selectively re-interpret the Bible to delude himself to believe in it. Because the Bible can't possibly be wrong, only our understanding of it.
Universe created in 7 days? Oh it's only a metaphor.
Fit all the species on a wooden boat? The boat was probably magical.
Explain how you should buy slaves? Oh God's probably just joking around.
Forbidden to eat shellfish? Yeah I'm not going to follow that one.
My favorite is the parts about selling your daughter off into slavery. Going to keep that one handy in case my daughter disobeys me.
On a serious note, I've never read his books. What's a good place to start?

The simple answer, spoco2, (so I don't waste my entire day trying to argue this stuff on here, the home of devout anti-christian fanatics) is that anyone who reads God as a maniac from the old testament just hasn't paid attention, stumbling at one of the most basic theological understandings. In other words, it's just plain missing the boat. It's like watching the first 30 seconds of a movie and trying to explain everything about it. People who do that are called idiots, and people who do the same with the bible get a similar title. It's just dumb, no matter which way you slice it, because you're obviously going to get stuff wrong. I don't expect everyone to decide on Christianity when reading the bible, but I expected more from Terry.
Mentality, your statement about selling daughters off into slavery is a great example of this. I'm mean really, if I have to explain that one to someone, they may as well permanently stamp an idiot tattoo to their forehead, it's so incredibly easy to understand, especially when it's spelt out in the equivalent of bright neon lights throughout the new testament.


R10k.

Do you reolise your rebuttal to sum one asking "please justify your opinion" was , "BECAUSE THE OTHER PERSON IS STUPID " you didn't provide anny data as to why your opinoin could be valid in anny way . ill show you why your response was useless.

1) "anyone who reads God as a maniac from the old testament just hasn't paid attention, stumbling at one of the most basic theological understandings."

please tell us why this is the case? why are they wrong ?just saying sum one that dose something is not getting it is hardly helping anyone understand annything.
if you believe the bible is the word of god then its pretty shitly written if the people it was written for cannot understand it , also who are you to say one person reads it right or wrong it seems that noone knows what the fuck the bible is meant to say because there are god knows how many churches and devisdoins of christainty all that read it differently.





2) at a guess based of what you typed i believe that you are adiment that the bible was written in a linear fashion with the start as a lesson and the end correcting that. as if it was written like a novel. ( as if some how reading the whole thing would give it sense )

the fundamental problem is that we know from historical data that the bible was written in a fragmented fashion by different people over different periods of time , and it was also rearranged repeatedly , we also know that the bible has Manny points where it makes no seance and that churches have edited what got included in the "bible" that we now know. (Evan if there was an original bible written in a correct intended order and structure we certainly don't have that now)


If you don't take the bible literally then how do you know what to take literally surly it makes more sence to believe that stoning homosexuals is something you should do and take litraly as we know homosexuals at least exsist. why not ignore the parts about god and prayer when we know in reality that there is no evidence that god exists , and it has been proven scientifically that prayer dose not work.

How do you know what is not literal and what is who are you to chose ?

If you take the bible literally why are you not out stoning gays and doing everything exactly as it is in the bible?