So he drives his car along the top of a moving train... should be a good romp!

But can't you see that you were totally asking for it? You try to correct somebody else, I correct you. Funny, huh?

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
I miss one error and you jump all over me...

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
I know. I'm just messin' with ya. But, seriously, don't flame people for their semantics unless you do it right. Short notice my old lady's corset cover! *rolls eyes*

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
True... Hey, hey I said he needed an editor. And it was short notice.

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
>> ^MycroftHomlz:
He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:
That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.
Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...


If you're going to be all stuck-up and edit other people's stuff, you can at least correct "your welcome."

It's YOU'RE welcome! YOU'RE! It's a contraction. YOU ARE=YOU'RE! Get it right.

*wink* @ Grinter. Semantics flame fest. Yay!

I miss one error and you jump all over me...

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
I know. I'm just messin' with ya. But, seriously, don't flame people for their semantics unless you do it right. Short notice my old lady's corset cover! *rolls eyes*

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
True... Hey, hey I said he needed an editor. And it was short notice.

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
>> ^MycroftHomlz:
He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:
That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.
Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...


If you're going to be all stuck-up and edit other people's stuff, you can at least correct "your welcome."

It's YOU'RE welcome! YOU'RE! It's a contraction. YOU ARE=YOU'RE! Get it right.

*wink* @ Grinter. Semantics flame fest. Yay!

I know. I'm just messin' with ya. But, seriously, don't flame people for their semantics unless you do it right. Short notice my old lady's corset cover! *rolls eyes*

In reply to this comment by MycroftHomlz:
True... Hey, hey I said he needed an editor. And it was short notice.

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
>> ^MycroftHomlz:
He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:
That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.
Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...


If you're going to be all stuck-up and edit other people's stuff, you can at least correct "your welcome."

It's YOU'RE welcome! YOU'RE! It's a contraction. YOU ARE=YOU'RE! Get it right.

*wink* @ Grinter. Semantics flame fest. Yay!

True... Hey, hey I said he needed an editor. And it was short notice.

In reply to this comment by thepinky:
>> ^MycroftHomlz:
He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:
That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.
Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...


If you're going to be all stuck-up and edit other people's stuff, you can at least correct "your welcome."

It's YOU'RE welcome! YOU'RE! It's a contraction. YOU ARE=YOU'RE! Get it right.

*wink* @ Grinter. Semantics flame fest. Yay!

When I read the title, I was thinking of how they used to grab mailbags with hooked sticks out the window of the moving train in the 1800's. Mmm... this is much better.

>> ^MycroftHomlz:
He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:
That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.
Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...


If you're going to be all stuck-up and edit other people's stuff, you can at least correct "your welcome."

It's YOU'RE welcome! YOU'RE! It's a contraction. YOU ARE=YOU'RE! Get it right.

*wink* @ Grinter. Semantics flame fest. Yay!

ROFL you fucking handed it to MGR big time..

In reply to this comment by BenjaminFranklin2u:
M>> ^MarineGunrock:
Except that instead of complaining about having to wait for trains, people will complain about waiting for the loading car to show up. Then when it does, they'll complain about waiting for the train....still.
Someone please tell me how this solves any problems. - And for that matter, how it won't create new ones.


Thats easy, the energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes tremendous amounts of energy... therefore by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. Saves the train having to stop...therefore increasing the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. This would save HUGE amounts of energy, and therefore HUGE amounts of money, and is INCREDIBLY efficient.
Smart people do not usually complain about waiting for trains, they are usually on time. It's the people on the train already that have to constantly stop to pick other people up, making the journey ever longer depending on the amount of stops.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you.

He needs an editor. Here is what I could do on such short notice:

That's easy. The energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes is tremendous! Therefore, by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train, the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. This saves the train having to stop and increases the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. It would also save HUGE amounts of energy and money; moreover, it would be INCREDIBLY efficient.

Trains would be more likely to be on time with this innovation.

Your welcome for doing the thinking for you, but that should be expected cause your are a marine...

M>> ^MarineGunrock:
Except that instead of complaining about having to wait for trains, people will complain about waiting for the loading car to show up. Then when it does, they'll complain about waiting for the train....still.
Someone please tell me how this solves any problems. - And for that matter, how it won't create new ones.


Thats easy, the energy it takes to stop and accelerate a train at each stop takes tremendous amounts of energy... therefore by using a simple deceleration rail on the top of each train the boarding cart merely uses the inertia of the already moving train to launch and dock boarding cart. Saves the train having to stop...therefore increasing the number of stops/stations you can have in a rail line without increasing the number of trains you would have to run. This would save HUGE amounts of energy, and therefore HUGE amounts of money, and is INCREDIBLY efficient.
Smart people do not usually complain about waiting for trains, they are usually on time. It's the people on the train already that have to constantly stop to pick other people up, making the journey ever longer depending on the amount of stops.
Your welcome for doing the thinking for you.

In the early days of the Cross Continental Railroad in the United States, wealthy landowners used to shoot and kill the wild bison from the the moving train, leaving their dead or dying carcasses to rot in the empty landscapes.

At least the native americans would use the bison for food and other sundries. Caucasian arrogance? or ignorance.

>> Uh, the card wasn't there on the window earlier.
Umm, yeah. It's not in the window when he performs the trick.

Moreover, I've always seen the trick performed where people are looking at the window and there is no possible way someone is even on the other side of it. Example 1) David Copperfield was on a moving train and made the card appear on the outside of a dining car window. Example 2) a Japanese magician (still on VideoSift somewhere) is in a boat with glass windows below deck and makes the card appear on the ocean side of the glass.

Real bummer this "revelation" as it really revealed nothing.

ok, so when did peeps stop searching for duplicates?

http://www.videosift.com/video/ATV-jumps-a-moving-train

Just happens to be the second video I posted a while ago to be duped recently.

The Title should be "ATV Attempts To Jump A Moving Train".