Wow. That's messed up.

I was somewhat disturbed by the content of your above referenced link. While many of the references to past events are not a surprise to me (it's well documented that both Anglican and RC missionaries committed acts that can only be described as atrocities and/or cultural genocide) Annet's references starting in 1969 just did not ring true based on my personal interactions within First Nations groups from Alaska to Victoria and commencing around 1973/74. As a result I've spent the last couple of hours trying to verify any of his statements with negative results. What I have found is that first nations groups in Manitoba which have been hit particularly hard by H1N1 received body bags as part of normal medical resupply and are in fact demanding supplies of Tamiflu and to be prioritized when new vaccines become available. The opening reference to the Ahousaht reserve appears to be totally bogus as well. The Indian Act does not require on reserve Indians to submit to medical experimentation and bill C-6 has nothing to do with H1N1 vaccinations, but rather is " the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act". I have reviewed the entire Act and found no reference at all to H1N1 or vaccines compulsory or otherwise.

It appears to me that Kevin Annet is basically a loon with some personal axe to grind and is not averse to making up "facts" to support his position.