canadian man faces jail for disagreeing with a feminist

i recently posted a video where an over the top racist got caught on camera,being a racist.the man consequently lost his job and this has spurred a discussion on the possible abuses of social warriors and the PC police.

my argument was not in defending turdnugget (my affectionate name for the racist),but rather pointing to the disturbing trend of overly sensitive,highly privileged whiners who seem to feel they have a right to not be offended and if they ARE offended,then the offender should have to pay real world consequences.

my argument has been received with mixed and luke warm responses,with the majority rejoicing in turdnugget losing his job.which is understandable,because turdnugget is easy to hate and we can feel the warm and fuzzy of moral superiority while ignoring the much larger implications of the dangers of social warriors imposing their own narrow world view upon the rest of us.using the very thing we see as liberating:the internet.

i think the reason why i have been so adamant in my argument is because i have been researching this particular case.this mans life has been destroyed because of fanatical,third wave feminists.who appear to reside in a constant state of victimhood and feel it totally acceptable to destroy a mans life for the horrendous crime of disagreeing with them.

so to my friends who think the social warriors and/or the PC police cannot influence real world results,or impose their own narrow worldview upon the rest of us.i present to you mr elliot,who is paying for having the hubris,the audacity,to disagree politically with stephanie guthrie.

freedom of speech?
not if it hurts someones feelings,or disagrees with them politically.

i have to admit that last year,when the whole anita sarkesian situation was blowing up.i had no idea,nor did i really care.i just thought it was just some whiny,cry-baby women who was stomping her feet for attention.i casually dismissed sarkesian as an attention whore and therefore..irrelevant.

and then i stumble upon this story...
i was wrong..
but can you blame me?
it just seems so silly,so stupid.
sarkesions victimhood claims appeared so spurious and insipid as to not warrant any real attention.

i think greg elliot would have disagreed with me.

so when i make my argument the dangers of social warriors and PC police with an agenda,THIS is what i am talking about.

i apologize for the length of this description,but i wanted my position to be clear.

for a much more in-depth analysis and breakdown:
https://youtu.be/7KpCnsF4sJ0
part 2:
https://youtu.be/bcFlV-Q1Fhk

Load Comments...

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More